Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2022.e69

A preliminary evaluation on mixed probiotics as an antimicrobial spraying agent in growing pig barn  

Shanmugam, Sureshkumar (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Jae Hong, Park (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
In Ho, Kim (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.64, no.6, 2022 , pp. 1035-1045 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether spraying an anti-microbial agent into the slurry pit will reduce the noxious odor substances from piggery barns. For this, a total of 200 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) growing pigs with an initial average body weight (BW) of 23.58 ± 1.47 kg were selected and housed in two different rooms, i.e. control (CON) and treatment (TRT). Each room has 100 pigs (60 gilts and 40 borrows). For a period of 42 days, all pigs were fed with corn-soybean meal-based basal diet. Later the noxious odor substances were measured by the following methods. First, fecal samples were randomly collected and stored in sealed and unsealed containers, and sprayed with the non-anti-microbial agent (NAMA) (saline water) and multi-bacterial spraying (MBS) agent (200 :1, mixing ratio-fecal sample : probiotic), Second, the slurry pit of CON and TRT rooms were directly sprayed with NAMA and MBS, respectively. The fecal sample that was stored in sealed and un-sealed containers and sprayed with MBS significantly reduced NH3 and CO2 concentration at the end of day 7. However, at the end of day 42, the fecal sample showed a lower H2S, methyl mercaptans, acetic acid, and CO2 concentration compared to the unsealed container. Moreover, at the end of days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 compared to the CON room and TRT room slurry pit emits lower concentrations of NH3, acetic acid, H2S, and methyl mercaptans, and CO2 into the atmosphere. Based on the current findings, we infer that spraying anti-microbial agents on pig dung would be one of the better approaches to suppress the odor emission from the barn in the future.
Keywords
Multi-bacterial spray; Slurry odor; Gas emission; Growing pigs;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Schreier HJ. Biosynthesis of glutamine and glutamate and the assimilation of ammonia. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology; 1993. p. 281-5.
2 Schauberger G, Lim TT, Ni JQ, Bundy DS, Haymore BL, Diehl CA, et al. Empirical model of odor emission from deep-pit swine finishing barns to derive a standardized odor emission factor. Atmos Environ. 2013;66:84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.046   DOI
3 Hobbs PJ, Pain BF, Kay RM, Lee PA. Reduction of odorous compounds in fresh pig slurry by dietary control of crude protein. J Sci Food Agric. 1996;71:508-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199608)71:4<508::AID-JSFA610>3.0.CO;2-0   DOI
4 Kay RM. Ammonia emission from pig buildings and characteristics of slurry produced by pigs offered low crude protein diets. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium Ammonia and Odour Control from Animal Production Facilities; 1997; Vinkeloord, The Netherlands. p.245-52.
5 Yuan Z, Ji J, Sheng H, Jiang S, Chen T, Liu X, et al. Animal based diets and environment: perspective from phosphorus flow quantifications of livestock and poultry raising in China. J Environ Manage. 2019;244:199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.028   DOI
6 Okoli IC, Alaehie DA, Akano EC, Ogundu UE, Okoli CG, Akujobi CT, et al. Aerial pollutant gases concentrations in tropical pig pen environment in Nigeria. Res J Environ Sci. 2007;1:110-5. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2007.110.115   DOI
7 Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams AG. Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front. 2018;9:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy034   DOI
8 Chu GM, Lee SJ, Jeong HS, Lee SS. Efficacy of probiotics from anaerobic microflora with prebiotics on growth performance and noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Anim Sci J. 2011;82:282-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00828.x   DOI
9 Peirson S, Nicholson R. Measurement of odour and ammonia emissions from livestock buildings. London: Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food; 1995. ADAS WA0601 Phase 1-Final report.
10 Jacobson L, Johnston L, Hetchler B, Janni K. Odor emissions control by sprinkling oil for dust reduction in pig buildings. In: International Symposium on Dust Control in Animal Production Facilities; 1999; Aarhus, Denmark.
11 Varel VH, Miller DN. Plant-derived oils reduce pathogens and gaseous emissions from stored cattle waste. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1366-70. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.3.1366-1370.2001   DOI
12 Ottengraf SPP, Van Den Oever AHC. Kinetics of organic compound removal from waste gases with a biological filter. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25:3089-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260251222   DOI
13 Chung KT, Anderson GM, Fulk GE. Formation of indoleacetic acid by intestinal anaerobes. J Bacteriol. 1975;124:573-5. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.124.1.573-575.1975   DOI
14 Zhu J. A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2000;78:93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00116-4   DOI
15 Sun B, Zhang L, Yang L, Zhang F, Norse D, Zhu Z. Agricultural non-point source pollution in China: causes and mitigation measures. Ambio. 2012;41:370-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0249-6   DOI
16 Herrero M, Thornton PK. Livestock and global change: emerging issues for sustainable food systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20878-81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321844111   DOI
17 Kafle GK, Chen L. Emissions of odor, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and volatile organic compounds from shallow-pit pig nursery rooms. J Biosyst Eng. 2014;39:76-86. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.2.076   DOI
18 MAFRA [Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs]. A case study of the farm to improving livestock odor. Sejong: MAFRA; 2018.
19 Sutton AL, Kephart KB, Verstegen MWA, Canh TT, Hobbs PJ. Potential for reduction of odorous compounds in swine manure through diet modification. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:430-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772430x   DOI
20 Mallin MA, Cahoon LB. Industrialized animal production-a major source of nutrient and microbial pollution to aquatic ecosystems. Popul Environ. 2003;24:369-85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023690824045   DOI
21 Park S, Cho S, Hwang O. Effects of Italian ryegrass (IRG) supplementation on animal performance, gut microbial compositions and odor emission from manure in growing pigs. Agronomy. 2020;10:647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050647   DOI
22 Hood MC, Shah SB, Kolar P, Stikeleather LF. Design and operation of a biofilter for treatment of swine house pit ventilation exhaust. In: 2011 ASABE Annual International Meeting, August 7-10, 2011; 2011; Louisville KY. Paper No.1111023.
23 Yeo UH, Decano-Valentin C, Ha T, Lee IB, Kim RW, Lee SY, et al. Impact analysis of environmental conditions on odour dispersion emitted from pig house with complex terrain using CFD. Agronomy. 2020;10:1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111828   DOI
24 ME [Ministry of Environment]. Law on Offensive Odor Control, Law No. 17845 (Feb. 1, 2012).
25 Gerber P, Chilonda P, Franceschini G, Menzi H. Geographical determinants and environmental implications of livestock production intensification in Asia. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:263-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.016   DOI
26 Al-Kanani T, Akochi E, MacKenzie AF, Alli I, Barrington S. Odor control in liquid hog manure by added amendments and aeration. J Environ Qual. 1992;21:704-8. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100040027x   DOI
27 Colletti J, Hoff S, Thompson J, Tyndall J. Vegetative environmental buffers to mitigate odor and aerosol pollutants emitted from poultry production sites. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality; 2006; Potomac, MD. pp. 5-8.
28 Rzeznik W, Mielcarek-Bochenska P. Effect of the slurry application method on odour emissions: a pilot study. Pol J Environ Stud. 2020;29:1503-9. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/108514   DOI
29 Sheridan B, Curran T, Dodd V, Colligan J. SE-structures and environment: biofiltration of odour and ammonia from a pig unit-biofiltration of odour and ammonia from a pig unit-a pilot-scale study. Biosyst Eng. 2002;82:441-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0083   DOI
30 VanderZaag AC, Gordon RJ, Glass VM, Jamieson RC. Floating covers to reduce gas emissions from liquid manure storages: a review. Appl Eng Agric. 2008;24:657-71. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25273   DOI
31 Baskota N, Acharya MP, Dahal M, Shrestha S, Shrestha A, Tamang P. A review: practical approaches for mitigation of odor from pig farm in Nepal. In: Proceedings of 12th National Workshop on Livestock and Fisheries Research in Nepal, 3-4 March; 2021; Rampur, Chitwan. pp.163-70.
32 Godbout S, Lemay SP, Joncas R, Larouche JP, Martin DY, Leblanc M, et al. Reduction of odour and gas emissions from swine buildings using canola oil sprinkling and alternate diets. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference; 2000; Des Moines, IA;. pp. 211-9.
33 Rahman S, Borhan MS. Typical odor mitigation technologies for swine production facilities - a review. J Civ Environ Eng. 2012;2:117. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000117   DOI
34 Kim KY, Ko HJ, Kim HT, Kim YS, Roh YM, Lee CM, et al. Odor reduction rate in the confinement pig building by spraying various additives. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8464-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.082   DOI
35 Maurer DL, Koziel JA, Harmon JD, Hoff SJ, Rieck-Hinz AM, Andersen DS. Summary of performance data for technologies to control gaseous, odor, and particulate emissions from livestock operations: air management practices assessment tool (AMPAT). Data Brief. 2016;7:1413-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.03.070   DOI
36 Choi YM, Choi YJ. Regulation of odor gas emission and performance by probiotic Bacillus in livestock industry. Arch Anim Poult Sci. 2019;1:555560. https://doi.org/10.19080/AAPS.2019.01.555560   DOI
37 Sannikova N, Kovaleva O. Use of probiotic preparations in waste waters cleaning of agricultural enterprises. KnE Life Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i14.5598   DOI
38 Bellot MC, Mertz KJ, Rehberger TG. Bacillus strains useful for animal odor control. United States patent US-8999318-B2. 2015 Apr 7.
39 NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
40 Wang K, Huang D, Ying H, Luo H. Effects of acidification during storage on emissions of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from digested pig slurry. Biosyst Eng. 2014;122:23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.002   DOI
41 McCrory DF, Hobbs PJ. Additives to reduce ammonia and odor emissions from livestock wastes: a review. J Environ Qual. 2001;30:345-55. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302345x   DOI
42 Loyon L, Burton CH, Misselbrook T, Webb J, Philippe FX, Aguilar M, et al. Best available technology for European livestock farms: availability, effectiveness and uptake. J Environ Manage. 2016;166:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.046   DOI