1 |
Livestock Policy Division. The requirements for permission and registration of livestock industry in the Enforcement Decree of the Livestock Industry Act (14). (Implementation March 25, 2021 / Presidential Decree No. 30974, August 26, 2020, partially amended) [Internet]. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 18]. https://law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%B6%95%EC%82%B0%EB%B2%95%20%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EB%A0%B9
|
2 |
Courboulay V, Foubert C. Testing different methods to evaluate pig welfare on farm. Anim Welf. 2007;16:193-6.
|
3 |
Wemelsfelder F. How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of behavior. Anim Welf. 2007;16:25-31.
DOI
|
4 |
Yao HQ, Choi HL, Zhu K, Lee JH. Key volatile organic compounds emitted from swine nursery house. Atmos Environ. 2011;45:2577-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.058
DOI
|
5 |
Temple D, Dalmau A, Ruiz de la Torre JL, Manteca X, Velarde A. Application of the Welfare Quality® protocol to assess growing pigs kept under intensive conditions in Spain. J Vet Behav. 2011;6:138-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.10.003
DOI
|
6 |
Temple D, Courboulay V, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing. Animal. 2012;6:656-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001868
DOI
|
7 |
Meyer-Hamme SEK, Lambertz C, Gauly M. Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs? Animal. 2016;10:142-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001779
DOI
|
8 |
Smith WJ. A study of adventitious bursitis of the hock of the pig [Ph.D. dissertation]. Edinburgh, Scotland: The University of Edinburgh; 1993.
|
9 |
Mouttotou N, Green LE, Hatchell FM. Adventitious bursitis of the hock in finishing pigs: prevalence, distribution and association with floor type and foot lesions. Vet Rec. 1998;142:109-14. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.5.109
DOI
|
10 |
Mouttotou N, Hatchell FM, Green LE. Prevalence and risk factors associated with adventitious bursitis in live growing and finishing pigs in south-west England. Prev Vet Med. 1999;39:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(98)00141-X
DOI
|
11 |
Marx D, Mertz R. Ethically chosen studies with early-weaned piglets during their raising in pens with different applications of straw. 1. The effects of different applications of straw and different floor conditions in areas of uniform size. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1989;96:20-6.
|
12 |
Ekkel ED, Spoolder HAM, Hulsegge I, Hopster H. Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003;80:19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00154-5
DOI
|
13 |
Courboulay V, Eugene A, Delarue E. Welfare assessment in 82 pig farms: effect of animal age and floor type on behaviour and injuries in fattening pigs. Anim Welf. 2009;18:515-21.
DOI
|
14 |
Gillman CE, Kilbride AL, Ossent P, Green LE. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commercial farms in England. Prev Vet Med. Mar 17 2008;83(3-4):308-22. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.001
DOI
|
15 |
Lyons CAP, Bruce JM, Fowler VR, English PR. A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livest Prod Sci. 1995;43:265-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00050-U
DOI
|
16 |
Velarde A, Geers R. On farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic; 2007.
|
17 |
Petersen V, Simonsen HB, Lawson LG. The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1995;45:215-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00631-2
DOI
|
18 |
Vinuela-Fernandez I, Jones E, Welsh EM, Fleetwood-Walker SM. Pain mechanisms and their implication for the management of pain in farm and companion animals. Vet J. 2007;174:227-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.002
DOI
|
19 |
Temple D, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A. Assessment of animal welfare through behavioural parameters in Iberian pigs in intensive and extensive conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2011;131:29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.013
DOI
|
20 |
Duncan IJ, Petherick JC. The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. J Anim Sci. 1991;69:5017-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69125017x
DOI
|
21 |
Van Putten G. Ever been close to a nosey pig? Appl Anim Ethol. 1979;5:298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(79)90076-2
DOI
|
22 |
Feddes JJR, Fraser D, Buckley DJ, Poirier P. Electronic sensing of non-destructive chewing by growing pigs. Trans ASAE. 1993;36:955-8. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28421
DOI
|
23 |
Van Putten G, Dammers J. A comparative study of the well-being of piglets reared conventionally and in cages. Appl Anim Ethol. 1976;2:339-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(76)90067-576
DOI
|
24 |
Fraser AF, Broom DM. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. 3rd ed. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1990.
|
25 |
Moinard C, Mendl M, Nicol CJ, Green LE. A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003;81:333-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00276-9
DOI
|
26 |
Baxter S. Intensive pig production: environmental management and design. London: Granada Technical Books; 1984.
|
27 |
Battini M, Agostini A, Mattiello S. Understanding cows' emotions on farm: are eye white and ear posture reliable indicators? Animals. 2019;9:477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080477
DOI
|
28 |
Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM. Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav. 1971;19:500-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(71)80104-5
DOI
|
29 |
Marchant-Forde JN. The welfare of pigs. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.
|
30 |
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, et al. Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;101:185-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
DOI
|
31 |
Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Coleman GJ. The human-animal relationship in agriculture and its consequences for the animal. Anim Welf. 1993;2:33-51.
DOI
|
32 |
de Passille AM, Rushen J. Can we measure human-animal interactions in on-farm animal welfare assessment?: some unresolved issues. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005;92:193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.006
DOI
|
33 |
Rutherford KMD, Donald RD, Lawrence AB, Wemelsfelder F. Qualitative Behavioural Assessment of emotionality in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012;139:218-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.004
DOI
|
34 |
Moines D. Swine care handbook. Des Moines, IA: National Pork Board; 2002.
|
35 |
Cargill C, Byrt D. The effect of environmental temperature on the development of elements of intestinal immunity in pigs. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Enteric Infections and their Control; 1983; Perth, WA.
|
36 |
Morrow-Tesch JL, McGlone JJ, Salak-Johnson JL. Heat and social stress effects on pig immune measures. J Anim Sci. 1994;72:2599-609. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72102599x
DOI
|
37 |
Le Dividich J. Effects of environmental temperature on the growth rates of early-weaned piglets. Livest Prod Sci. 1981;8:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(81)90032-4
DOI
|
38 |
Scheepens CJM, Tielen MJM, Hessing MJC. Influence of daily intermittent draught on the health status of weaned pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 1991;29:241-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90069-3
DOI
|
39 |
Cameron R. Diseases of the skin. In: Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, Taylor DJ. Diseases of swine. 9th ed. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006.
|
40 |
Paynter S. Humidity and respiratory virus transmission in tropical and temperate settings. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1110-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268814002702
DOI
|
41 |
Boyle L, Quinn A, Calderon Diaz JA. Lameness in pigs. In: Pig Farmers' Conference 2013; 2013; Ireland. p. 47-50.
|
42 |
Wemelsfelder F, Millard F, De Rosa G, Napolitano F. Qualitative behaviour assessment. In: Forkman B, Keeling L, editors. Assessment of animal welfare measures for sows, piglets and fattening pigs. Lelystad: Welfare Quality; 2009. p. 215-25.
|
43 |
Wemelsfelder F, Haskell M, Mendl MT, Calvert S, Lawrence AB. Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions. Anim Behav. 2000;60:385-94. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1466
DOI
|
44 |
Vitali M, Santolini E, Bovo M, Tassinari P, Torreggiani D, Trevisi P. Behavior and welfare of undocked heavy pigs raised in buildings with different ventilation systems. Animals. 2021;11:2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082338
DOI
|
45 |
Wathes CM, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RPP, et al. Emissions of aerial pollutants in livestock buildings in Northern Europe: overview of a multinational project. J Agric Eng Res. 1998;70:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0278
DOI
|
46 |
Kim KY, Ko HJ, Kim HT, Kim CN, Kim YS. Assessment of airborne bacteria and fungi in pig buildings in Korea. Biosyst Eng. 2008;99:565-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.12.006
DOI
|
47 |
Clark S, Rylander R, Larsson L. Airborne bacteria, endotoxin and fungi in dust in poultry and swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1983;44:537-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668391405265
DOI
|
48 |
Griffiths WD, DeCosemo GAL. The assessment of bioaerosols: a critical review. J Aerosol Sci. 1994;25:1425-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90218-6
DOI
|
49 |
Hayes ET, Curran TP, Dodd VA. Odour and ammonia emissions from intensive pig units in Ireland. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:940-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.023
DOI
|
50 |
Kim KY, Ko HJ, Lee KJ, Park JB, Kim CN. Temporal and spatial distributions of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter. Environ Res. 2005;99:150-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.004
DOI
|
51 |
ACGIH [American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists]. TLVs and BEIs: Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 1999. Report No.: 2883.
|
52 |
Parker MO, O'Connor EA, McLeman MA, Demmers TGM, Lowe JC, Owen RC, et al. The impact of chronic environmental stressors on growing pigs, Sus scrofa (part 2): social behaviour. Animal. 2010;4:1910-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110001084
DOI
|
53 |
Smith JH, Wathes CM, Baldwin BA. The preference of pigs for fresh air over ammoniated air. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1996;49:417-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)01048-9
DOI
|
54 |
Jones JB, Wathes CM, Webster AJF. Operant responses of pigs to atmospheric ammonia. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;58:35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00130-5
DOI
|
55 |
Jones JB, Webster AJF, Wathes CM. Trade-off between ammonia exposure and thermal comfort in pigs and the influence of social contact. Anim Sci. 1999;68:387-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800050384
DOI
|
56 |
Wathes CM, Jones JB, Kristensen HH, Jones EKM, Webster AJF. Aversion of pigs and domestic fowl to atmospheric ammonia. Trans ASAE. 2002;45:1605-10. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.11067
DOI
|
57 |
O'Connor EA, Parker MO, McLeman MA, Demmers TG, Lowe JC, Cui L, et al. The impact of chronic environmental stressors on growing pigs, Sus scrofa (part 1): stress physiology, production and play behaviour. Animal. 2010;4:1899-909. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110001072
DOI
|
58 |
Moines D. Swine welfare assurance program: a program of America's pork producers. Clive, IA; National Pork Board; 2003.
|
59 |
Banhazi TM, Seedorf J, Rutley DL, Pitchford WS. Identification of risk factors for suboptimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 1. Study justification and design. J Agric Saf Health. 2008;14:5-20. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24120
DOI
|
60 |
Zejda JE, Barber E, Dosman JA, Olenchock SA, McDuffie HH, Rhodes C, et al. Respiratory health status in swine producers relates to endotoxin exposure in the presence of low dust levels. J Occup Med. 1994;36:49-56.
|
61 |
Temple D. Animal welfare assessment on intensive and extensive pig farms [Ph.D. dissertation]. Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; 2012.
|
62 |
Duchaine C, Grimard Y, Cormier Y. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2000;61:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660008984515
DOI
|
63 |
Air Management Division. The act of odor prevention (Implementation January 5, 2021 / Act No. 17845, January 5, 2021, partially amended) [Internet]. Ministry of Environment [cited 2021 Dec 18]. https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%95%85%EC%B7%A8%EB%B0%A9%EC%A7%80%EB%B2%95
|
64 |
Fraser D. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the 'inextricable connection'. Anim Welf. 1995;4:103-17.
|
65 |
Main DCJ, Kent JP, Wemelsfelder F, Ofner E, Tuyttens FAM. Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment. Anim Welf. 2003;12:523-8.
DOI
|
66 |
Welfare Quality. Welfare Quality assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs) [Internet]. Welfare Quality Consortium. 2009 [cited 2021 Dec 18]. http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net/media/1018/pig_protocol.pdf
|
67 |
Hernandez A, Berg C, Westin R, Galina C. Seasonal differences in animal welfare assessment of family farming dual-purpose cattle raised under tropical conditions. Animals. 2018;8:125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070125
DOI
|
68 |
Johnsen PF, Johannesson T, Sandoe P. Assessment of farm animal welfare at herd level: many goals, many methods. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2001;51:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923027
DOI
|
69 |
Main DCJ, Whay HR, Leeb C, Webster AJF. Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Anim Welf. 2007;16:233-6.
DOI
|
70 |
Kirchner MK, Schulze Westerath H, Knierim U, Tessitore E, Cozzi G, Pfeiffer C, et al. Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms. Animal. 2014;8:827-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000366
DOI
|
71 |
Renggaman A, Choi HL, Sudiarto SIA, Alasaarela L, Nam OS. Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures. J Anim Sci Technol. 2015;57:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-014-0034-0
DOI
|
72 |
Yao HQ, Choi HL, Lee JH, Suresh A, Zhu K. Effect of microclimate on particulate matter, airborne bacteria, and odorous compounds in swine nursery houses. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3707-14. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2399
DOI
|
73 |
Lewandowski J. Mikroklimat w obiektach inwentarskich dla trzody chlewnej i bydla. Warszawa: IBMER; 1997.
|
74 |
Augustynska-Prejsnar A, Ormian M. Ocena mikroklimatu w budynku dla loch w roznych porach roku. Problemy Inzynierii Rolniczej. 2012;2:95-101.
|
75 |
Cole D, Todd L, Wing S. Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:685-99. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108685
DOI
|
76 |
Meyer-Hamme S, Lambertz C, Gauly M. Assessing the welfare level of intensive fattening pig farms in Germany with the Welfare Quality® protocol: does farm size matter? Anim Welf. 2018;27:275-86. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.27.3.275
DOI
|
77 |
Korean Statistical Information Service. The number of farms and the number of pigs by province and city/farm size [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Dec 18]. https://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01&outLink=Y&entrType=#content-group
|