Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) |
Wei, Sheng Nan
(Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University)
Jeong, Eun Chan (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) Li, Yan Fen (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) Kim, Hak Jin (Research Institute of Eco-friendly Livestock Science, Institute of GreenBio Science Technology, Seoul National University) Ahmadi, Farhad (Research Institute of Eco-friendly Livestock Science, Institute of GreenBio Science Technology, Seoul National University) Kim, Jong Geun (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) |
1 | Martinez-Fernandez A, Soldado C, de la Roza Delgado B, Vicente F, Gonzalez-Arrojo MA, Argamenteria A. Modelling a quantitative ensilability index adapted to forages from wet temperate areas. Span J Agric Res. 2013;11:455-62. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3219 DOI |
2 | Lima R, Lourenco M, Diaz RF, Castro A, Fievez V. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and Lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010;155:122-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.10.008 DOI |
3 | Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Elferink SJWHO, Spoelstra SF. Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, editors. Silage Science and Technology. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronom; 2003. p. 31-93. |
4 | Amer S, Hassanat F, Berthiaume R, Seguin P, Mustafa AF. Effects of water soluble carbohydrate content on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of forage millet and forage sorghum silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;177:23-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.024 DOI |
5 | Ammar H, Lopez S, Gonzalez JS, Ranilla MJ. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of some Spanish browse plant species. J Sci Food Agric. 2004;84:197-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1635 DOI |
6 | McCartney D, Fraser J, Ohama A. Potential of warm-season annual forages and Brassica crops for grazing: a Canadian review. Can J Anim Sci. 2009;89:431-40. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS09002 DOI |
7 | Habiyaremye C, Matanguihan JB, D'Alpoim Guedes J, Ganjyal GM, Whiteman MR, Kidwell KK, et al. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2017;7:1961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01961 DOI |
8 | Amadou I, Gounga ME, Le GW. Millets: nutritional composition, some health benefits and processing-a review. Emir J Food Agric. 2013;501-8. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i7.12045 DOI |
9 | Nematpour A, Eshghizadeh HR, Zahedi M. Comparing the corn, millet and sorghum as silage crops under different irrigation regime and nitrogen fertilizer levels. Int J Plant Prod. 2021;15:351-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-021-00142-8 DOI |
10 | Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, Kumai S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:520-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75263-X DOI |
11 | Fenton MP. An investigation into the sources of lactic acid bacteria in grass silage. J Appl Bacteriol. 1987;62:181-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02397.x DOI |
12 | Xu Z, He H, Zhang S, Kong J. Effects of inoculants Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus parafarraginis on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of corn stover silage. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14052-1 DOI |
13 | Kim JG, Chung ES, Seo S, Ham JS, Kang WS, Kim DA. Effects of maturity at harvest and wilting days on quality of round baled rye silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2001;14:1233-7. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1233 DOI |
14 | Schroeder JW. Forage nutrition for ruminants. Fargo, ND: NDSU Extension Service, North Dakota State University; 2004. |
15 | ANKOM Technology. ANKOM Technology method 3: in vitro true digestibility using the DAISYII incubator [Internet]. ANKOM Technology. 2017 [2021 May 10]. http://www.ankom.com/media/documents/IVDMD_0805_D200.pdf |
16 | Jahansouz MR, Keshavarz Afshar R, Heidari H, Hashemi M. Evaluation of yield and quality of sorghum and millet as alternative forage crops to corn under normal and deficit irrigation regimes. Jordan J Agric Sci. 2014;10:699-715. https:/doi.org/10.12816/0031747 DOI |
17 | Kim JG, Jeong EC, Kim MJ, Li YF, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Comparison of growth characteristics and productivity of summer forage crops in Sihwa reclaimed land. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2021;41:110-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2021.41.2.110 DOI |
18 | Queiroz OCM, Ogunade IM, Weinberg Z, Adesogan AT. Silage review: foodborne pathogens in silage and their mitigation by silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4132-42. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13901 DOI |
19 | Shao T, Ohba N, Shimojo M, Masuda Y. Dynamics of early fermentation of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2002;15:1606-10. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1606 DOI |
20 | Arriola KG, Queiroz OCM, Romero JJ, Casper D, Muniz E, Hamie J, et al. Effect of microbial inoculants on the quality and aerobic stability of bermudagrass round-bale haylage. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:478-85. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8411 DOI |
21 | Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Broderick GA, Weimer PJ. Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179:61-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008 DOI |
22 | Muck R, Kung L. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. In: Proceedings from the Silage: Field to Feedbunk, North American Conference; 1997; Hershey, PA. |
23 | Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J Anim Sci. 1978;47:747-59. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.473747x DOI |
24 | KOSIS [Korean Statistical Information Service]. Farm households by size of raising Korean beef cattle/total head [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 September 3]. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1EO221&conn_path=I2 |
25 | Calamai A, Masoni A, Marini L, Dell'acqua M, Ganugi P, Boukail S, et al. Evaluation of the agronomic traits of 80 accessions of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) under Mediterranean pedoclimatic conditions. Agriculture. 2020;10:578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture10120578 DOI |
26 | Lynch JP, O'Kiely P, Doyle EM. Yield, quality and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize and of the cob and stover components: harvest date and hybrid effects. Grass Forage Sci. 2012;67:472-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00868.x DOI |
27 | Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J, Brock TD. Brock biology of microorganisms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall; 2003. |
28 | Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J. 1954;57:508-14. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508 DOI |
29 | Wei SN, Li YF, Jeong EC, Kim HJ, Kim JG. Effects of formic acid and lactic acid bacteria inoculant on main summer crop silages in Korea. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021;63:91-103. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e7 DOI |
30 | Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Long-term anaerobic conservation of fruit and vegetable discards without or with moisture adjustment after aerobic preservation with sodium metabisulfite. Waste Manag. 2019;87:258-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.010 DOI |
31 | Shao T, Zhang ZX, Shimojo M, Wang T, Masuda Y. Comparison of fermentation characteristics of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) during the early stage of ensiling. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2005;18:1727-34. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1727 DOI |
32 | Jean-Baptiste-Andre Dumas. Science. 1884;3:750-2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns3.72.750 |
33 | Weinberg ZG, Muck RE. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1996;19:53-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x DOI |
34 | Wiersma DW, Carter PR, Albrecht KA, Coors JG. Kernel milkline stage and corn forage yield, quality, and dry matter content. J Prod Agric. 1993;6:94-9. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1993.0094 DOI |
35 | Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63:64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8 DOI |
36 | Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 DOI |
37 | Shin JS, Kim WH, Lee SH, Shin HY. Comparison of forage yield and feed value of millet varieties in the reclaimed tidelands. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2006;26:215-20. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.4.215 DOI |
38 | Lyon DJ, Burgener PA, DeBoer KL, Harveson RM, Hein GL, Hergert GW, et al. Producing and marketing proso millet in the Great Plains. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska; 2008. Extension Circular #EC 137. |
39 | Wang M, Franco M, Cai Y, Yu Z. Dynamics of fermentation profile and bacterial community of silage prepared with alfalfa, whole-plant corn and their mixture. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;270:114702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114702 DOI |
40 | Horrocks RD, Valentine JF. Harvested forages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999. |
41 | Chen L, Yuan XJ, Li JF, Dong ZH, Wang SR, Guo G, et al. Effects of applying lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid on fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro gas production of forage-based total mixed ration silage in Tibet. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59:376-83. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16062 DOI |
42 | McDonald P, Henderson N, Heron S. The biochemistry of silage. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications; 1991. |
43 | Danner H, Holzer M, Mayrhuber E, Braun R. Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:562-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.562-567.2003 DOI |
44 | Diepersloot EC, Pupo MR, Ghizzi LG, Gusmao JO, Heinzen C Jr, McCary CL, et al. Effects of microbial inoculation and storage length on fermentation profile and nutrient composition of whole-plant sorghum silage of different varieties. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:660567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.660567 DOI |
45 | Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4020-33. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909 DOI |
46 | Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Washington, DC: US Department Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS); 1970. Agricultural Handbook No. 379. |
47 | Kim JS, Lee YH, Kim YI, Ahmadi F, Oh YK, Park JM, et al. Effect of microbial inoculant or molasses on fermentative quality and aerobic stability of sawdust-based spent mushroom substrate. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:188-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.056 DOI |