Complete genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus C5 as a potential canine probiotics |
Son, Seungwoo
(Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University)
Lee, Raham (Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University) Park, Seung-Moon (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University) Lee, Sung Ho (Woogene B&G) Lee, Hak-Kyo (Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University) Kim, Yangseon (Center for Industrialization of Agriculture and Livestock Microorganism) Shin, Donghyun (Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University) |
1 | Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y DOI |
2 | Loytynoja A. Phylogeny-aware alignment with PRANK. In: Russell D, editor. Multiple sequence alignment methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2014. p. 155-70. |
3 | Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W609-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl315 DOI |
4 | Chung WH, Kang J, Lim MY, Lim T, Lim S, Roh SW, et al. Complete genome sequence and genomic characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA1 (11869BP). Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00083 DOI |
5 | Falentin H, Cousin S, Clermont D, Creno S, Ma L, Chuat V, et al. Draft genome sequences of five strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus, strain CIP 76.13T, isolated from humans, strains CIRM-BIA 442 and CIRM-BIA 445, isolated from dairy products, and strains DSM 20242 and DSM 9126 of unknown origin. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00658-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00658-13 DOI |
6 | Heo J, Shin D, Chang SY, Bogere P, Park MR, Ryu S, et al. Comparative genome analysis and evaluation of probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum strain JDFM LP11. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2018;38:878-8. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e21 DOI |
7 | Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15611-6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607117103 DOI |
8 | Yang Z, Bielawski JP. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01994-7 DOI |
9 | vonHoldt BM, Pollinger JP, Lohmueller KE, Han E, Parker HG, Quignon P, et al. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature. 2010;464:898-902. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08837 DOI |
10 | Baker JL, Sudarsan N, Weinberg Z, Roth A, Stockbridge RB, Breaker RR. Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride. Science. 2012;335:233-5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215063 DOI |
11 | Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt ML, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature. 2013;495:360-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11837 DOI |
12 | Coelho LP, Kultima JR, Costea PI, Fournier C, Pan Y, Czarnecki-Maulden G, et al. Similarity of the dog and human gut microbiomes in gene content and response to diet. Microbiome. 2018;6:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0450-3 DOI |
13 | Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev. a026334 DOI |
14 | Fijan S. Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:4745-67. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504745 DOI |
15 | Richter M, Rossello-Mora R, Oliver Glockner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 DOI |
16 | Goh YJ, Klaenhammer TR. Insights into glycogen metabolism in Lactobacillus acidophilus: impact on carbohydrate metabolism, stress tolerance and gut retention. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0094-3 DOI |
17 | Ljungh A, Wadstrom T. Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2006;7:73-90. |
18 | Marelli SP, Fusi E, Giardini A, Martino PA, Polli M, Bruni N, et al. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on the nutritional and health status of boxer dogs. Vet Rec. 2020;187:e28. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105434 DOI |
19 | Barko PC, McMichael MA, Swanson KS, Williams DA. The gastrointestinal microbiome: a review. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32:9-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14875 DOI |
20 | Sommer F, Backhed F. The gut microbiota - masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:227-38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2974 DOI |
21 | Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1586-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm088 DOI |
22 | Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 DOI |
23 | Son S, Oh JD, Lee SH, Shin D, Kim Y. Comparative genomics of canine Lactobacillus reuteri reveals adaptation to a shared environment with humans. Genes Genomics. 2020;42:1107-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-020-00978-w DOI |
24 | Pfeiler EA, Azcarate-Peril MA, Klaenhammer TR. Characterization of a novel bile-inducible operon encoding a two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:4624-34. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00337-07 DOI |
25 | Stahl B, Barrangou R. Complete genome sequence of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00376-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00376-13 DOI |
26 | Dean SN, Vora GJ, Walper SA. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain ATCC 53544. Genome Announc. 2017;5:e01138-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01138-17 DOI |
27 | Goh YJ, Klaenhammer TR. A functional glycogen biosynthesis pathway in Lactobacillus acidophilus: expression and analysis of the glg operon. Mol Microbiol. 2013;89:1187-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12338 DOI |
28 | Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLOS Genet. 2008;4:e1000304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 DOI |
29 | Kimura M. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature. 1977;267:275-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/267275a0 DOI |
30 | Jang SY, Heo J, Park MR, Song MH, Kim JN, Jo SH, et al. Genome characteristics of Lactobacillus fermentum strain JDFM216 for application as probiotic bacteria. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27:1266-71. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1703.03013 DOI |
31 | Baati L, Fabre-Gea C, Auriol D, Blanc PJ. Study of the cryotolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus: effect of culture and freezing conditions on the viability and cellular protein levels. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;59:241-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00361-5 DOI |
32 | Ghouri YA, Richards DM, Rahimi EF, Krill JT, Jelinek KA, DuPont AW. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014;7:473-87. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S27530 DOI |
33 | Berger B, Pridmore RD, Barretto C, Delmas-Julien F, Schreiber K, Arigoni F, et al. Similarity and differences in the Lactobacillus acidophilus group identified by polyphasic analysis and comparative genomics. J Bacteriol. 2007:1311-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01393-06 DOI |
34 | Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;349:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12293 DOI |
35 | Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 DOI |
36 | Frost LS, Leplae R, Summers AO, Toussaint A. Mobile genetic elements: the agents of open source evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:722-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1235 DOI |
37 | Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 DOI |
38 | Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernandez-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D309-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1085 DOI |
39 | Iartchouk O, Kozyavkin S, Karamychev V, Slesarev A. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus acidophilus FSI4, isolated from yogurt. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e00166-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00166-15 DOI |