Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e97

Effects of harvest intervals and seeding rates on dry matter yield and nutritive value of alfalfa cultivars  

Xu, Xuan (Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University)
Min, Doohong (Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University)
McDonald, Iryna (Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.63, no.5, 2021 , pp. 1098-1113 More about this Journal
Abstract
Maturation process of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) could be prevented by the reduction of lignin content in terms of conventional breeding or transgenic technology. Alfalfa could exhibit higher leaf/stem ratio, with a concern of yield loss. The objective of this study was to compare forage yield and nutritive value of low lignin alfalfa and two reference varieties subjecting to two harvest intervals and three seeding rates. The experimental design was a randomized complete block in a split-split plot arrangement with four replicates, where harvest intervals (28-day and 35-day) were assigned to whole plots, seeding rates were subplots, and varieties were sub-subplots. The weighted mean nutritive value was applied to two production years of 2016 and 2017. Hi-Gest 360 (low lignin alfalfa) provided similar yield potential and increased nutritive value compared to two reference varieties. Over a two-year production period, alfalfa harvested at every 28-day interval provided more economic returns than those at 35-day interval. For the seeding year and first production year, five cuts made by the 28-day interval produced more yield than four cuts by the 35-day interval. Due to limited rainfall in May 2017, a sharp drop of the first cutting overturned the advantage of the five-cut system. Shorter intervals between harvests generally increased crude protein (CP) concentrations. The differences of relative feed value (RFV) between two harvest intervals tended to be great during the first and second cuttings. Overall, harvest interval had a large effect on nutritive value and a more significant effect on alfalfa dry matter yield than variety selection. Seeding rate did not affect alfalfa yield and nutritive value.
Keywords
Low lignin; Alfalfa yield; Seeding rate; Nutritive values; Economic incomes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hall MH, Nelson CJ, Coutts JH, Stout RC. Effect of seeding rate on alfalfa stand longevity. Agron J. 2004;96:717-22. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0717   DOI
2 Lloveras J, Chocarro C, Freixes O, Arque E, Moreno A, Santiveri F. Yield, yield components, and forage nutritive value of alfalfa as affected by seeding rate under irrigated conditions. Agron J. 2008;100:191-7. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0333   DOI
3 Hansen LH, Krueger CR. Effect of establishment method, variety, and seeding rate on the production and quality of alfalfa under dryland and irrigation. Agron J. 1973;65:755-9. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500050024x   DOI
4 Krueger CR, Hansen LH. Establishment method, variety and seeding rate affect quality and production of alfalfa under dryland and irrigation. SD Farm Home Res. 1974;25:10-3.
5 Peterson PR, Sheaffer CC, Hall MH. Drought effects on perennial forage legume yield and quality. Agron J. 1992;84:774-9. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050003x   DOI
6 Hall MH, Smiles WS, Dickerson RA. Morphological development of alfalfa cultivars selected for higher quality. Agron J. 2000;92:1077-80. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.9261077x   DOI
7 Moore JE, Undersander DJ. Relative forage quality: an alternative to relative feed value and quality index. In: Proceedings of 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium; 2002; Gainesville, FL. p. 16-32.
8 Sheaffer CC, Peterson MA, McCaslin M, Volenec JJ, Cherney JH, Johnson KD, et al. Acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber concentration, and relative feed value. In: North American Alfalfa Improvement Conference; 1995; Minneapolis, MN.
9 Jeranyama P, Garcia AD. Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University; 2004. Extension Extra Paper No. 352.
10 Sheaffer CC, Martin NP, Lamb JAFS, Cuomo GR, Grimsbo Jewett J, et al. Leaf and stem properties of alfalfa entries. Agron J. 2000;92:733-9. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924733x   DOI
11 Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2   DOI
12 Humphreys JM, Chapple C. Rewriting the lignin roadmap. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00257-1   DOI
13 Newman YC, Justen V. Reduced lignin alfalfa. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Wisconsin Crop Manage Conference; 2016; Madison, WI. p. 69-72.
14 Mesonet. Weather data library. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University. 2017.
15 Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J Anim Sci. 1978;47:747-59. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.473747x   DOI
16 Sund JM, Barrington GP. Alfalfa seeding rates: their influence on dry matter yield, stand density and survival, root size and forage quality. Res Bull Wisconsin Univ. 1976.
17 Brink G, Hall M, Shewmaker G, Undersander D, Martin N, Walgenbach R. Changes in alfalfa yield and nutritive value within individual harvest periods. Agron J. 2010;102:1274-82. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0080   DOI
18 Iiyama K, Wallis AFA. Determination of lignin in herbaceous plants by an improved acetyl bromide procedure. J Sci Food Agric. 1990;51:145-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740510202   DOI
19 Van Soest PJ. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J Anim Sci. 1967;26:119-28. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1967.261119x   DOI
20 Pedersen JF, Vogel KP, Funnell DL. Impact of reduced lignin on plant fitness. Crop Sci. 2005;45:812-9. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0155   DOI
21 Sheaffer CC, Marten GC. Alfalfa cutting frequency and date of fall cutting. J Prod Agric. 1990;3:486-91. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1990.0486   DOI
22 Testa G, Gresta F, Cosentino SL. Dry matter and qualitative characteristics of alfalfa as affected by harvest times and soil water content. Eur J Agron. 2011;34:144-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.001   DOI
23 Wall LL Sr, Gehrke CW. An automated total protein nitrogen method. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1975;58:1221-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/58.6.1221   DOI
24 Brink GE, Marten GC. Harvest management of alfalfa-nutrient yield vs. forage quality, and relationship to persistence. J Prod Agric. 1989;2:32-6. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1989.0032   DOI
25 Grev AM, Scott Wells M, Samac DA, Martinson KL, Sheaffer CC. Forage accumulation and nutritive value of reduced lignin and reference alfalfa cultivars. Agron J. 2017;109:2749-61. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.04.0237   DOI
26 Jung HG, Mertens DR, Payne AJ. Correlation of acid detergent lignin and Klason lignin with digestibility of forage dry matter and neutral detergent fiber. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80:1622-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76093-4   DOI
27 Albrecht KA, Wedin WF, Buxton DR. Cell-wall composition and digestibility of alfalfa stems and leaves. Crop Sci. 1987;27:735-41. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700040027x   DOI
28 Jung HG, Engels FM. Alfalfa stem tissues: cell wall deposition, composition, and degradability. Crop Sci. 2002;42:524-34. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.5240   DOI
29 Undersander D, McCaslin M, Sheaffer C, Whalen D, Miller D, Putnam D, et al. Low lignin alfalfa: redefining the yield/quality tradeoff. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Western Alfalfa & Forage Conference; 2009; Reno, NV.
30 Sulc RM, Parker A, Albrecht K, Cassida K, Hall M, Min DH, et al. Low lignin alfalfa: wide area field test results. In: Proceedings of the 2016 California Alfalfa and Forage Symposium; 2016; Davis, CA.
31 Nocek JE, Grant AL. Characterization of in situ nitrogen and fiber digestion and bacterial nitrogen contamination of hay crop forages preserved at different dry matter percentages. J Anim Sci. 1987;64:552-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.642552x   DOI
32 Casler MD. In vitro digestibility of dry matter and cell wall constituents of smooth bromegrass forage. Crop Sci. 1987;27:931-4. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700050021x   DOI
33 Weir WC, Jones LG, Meyer JH. Effect of cutting interval and stage of maturity on the digestibility and yield of alfalfa. J Anim Sci. 1960;19:5-19. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1960.1915   DOI
34 Kallenbach RL, Nelson CJ, Coutts JH. Yield, quality, and persistence of grazing- and hay-type alfalfa under three harvest frequencies. Agron J. 2002;94:1094-103. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1094   DOI
35 Lloveras J, Ferran J, Alvarez A, Torres L. Harvest management effects on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production and quality in Mediterranean areas. J Br Grassl Soc. 1998;53:88-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00100.x   DOI