Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e57

Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus konkukensis sp. nov. SK3146 as a potential probiotic strain  

Jung, Hae-In (Department of Animal Sciences and Technology, Konkuk University)
Park, Sungkwon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University)
Niu, Kai-Min (Institute of Biological Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences)
Lee, Sang-Won (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Kothari, Damini (Department of Animal Sciences and Technology, Konkuk University)
Yi, Kwon Jung (Department of Animal Sciences and Technology, Konkuk University)
Kim, Soo-Ki (Department of Animal Sciences and Technology, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.63, no.3, 2021 , pp. 666-670 More about this Journal
Abstract
Paenibacillus konkukensis sp. nov., SK3146 is a novel strain isolated from a pig feed. Here, we present complete genome sequence of SK3146. The genome consists of a single circular genome measuring 7,968,964 bp in size with an average guanine + cytosine (G+C) content of 53.4%. Genomic annotation revealed that the strain encodes 151 proteins related to hydrolases (EC3), which was higher than those in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Diverse kinds of hydrolases including galactosidase, glucosidase, cellulase, lipase, xylanase, and protease were found in the genome of SK3146, coupled with one bacteriocin encoding gene. The complete genome sequence of P. konkukensis SK3146 indicates the immense probiotic potential of the strain with nutrient digestibility and antimicrobial activity functions.
Keywords
Paenibacillus; Complete genome sequence; Exoenzyme; Feed additive;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Barba-Vidal E, Martin-Orue SM, Castillejos L. Practical aspects of the use of probiotics in pig production: a review. Livest Sci. 2019;223:84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.017   DOI
2 Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Benef Microbes. 2010;1:3-9. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2008.1002   DOI
3 Cunningham M, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barnard A, Benoit V, Grimaldi R, Guyonnet D, et al. Shaping the future of probiotics and prebiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.01.003   DOI
4 Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L, Richman A, Yuan ZC. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7   DOI
5 Im WT, Yi KJ, Lee SS, Moon HI, Jeon CO, Kim DW, et al. Paenibacillus konkukensis sp. nov., isolated from animal feed. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:2343-8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001955   DOI
6 Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199   DOI
7 Van Domselaar GH, Stothard P, Shrivastava S, Cruz JA, Guo A, Dong X, et al. BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acid Res. 2005;33:W455-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki593   DOI
8 Naing KW, Anees M, Kim SJ, Nam Y, Kim YC, Kim KY. Characterization of antifungal activity of Paenibacillus ehimensis KWN38 against soilborne phytopathogenic fungi belonging to various taxonomic groups. Ann Microbiol. 2014;64:55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0632-y   DOI
9 Aureli R, La-Marta J, Grossi AB, Della Pia EA, Esteve-Garcia E, Wulf-Andersen L, et al. A novel glucuronoxylan hydrolase produced by fermentation is safe as feed additive: toxicology and tolerance in broiler chickens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;99:213-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.09.024   DOI
10 McDonald AG, Tipton KF. Fifty-five years of enzyme classification: advances and difficulties. FEBS J. 2014;281:583-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12530   DOI
11 Chi CH, Cho SJ. Improvement of bioactivity of soybean meal by solid-state fermentation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens versus Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2016;68:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.002   DOI