Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e43

Optimizing the composition of the medium for the viable cells of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis JNU306 using response surface methodology  

Dang, Thi Duyen (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University)
Yong, Cheng Chung (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University)
Rheem, Sungsue (Graduate School of Public Administration, Korea University)
Oh, Sejong (Department of Animal Science, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.63, no.3, 2021 , pp. 603-613 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research improved the growth potential of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis strain JNU306, a commercial medium that is appropriate for large-scale production, in yeast extract, soy peptone, glucose, L-cysteine, and ferrous sulfate. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the components of this medium, using a central composite design and subsequent analyses. A second-order polynomial regression model, which was fitted to the data at first, significantly lacked fitness. Thus, through further analyses, the model with linear and quadratic terms plus two-way, three-way, and four-way interactions was selected as the final model. Through this model, the optimized medium composition was found as 2.8791% yeast extract, 2.8030% peptone soy, 0.6196% glucose, 0.2823% L-cysteine, and 0.0055% ferrous sulfate, w/v. This optimized medium ensured that the maximum biomass was no lower than the biomass from the commonly used blood-liver (BL) medium. The application of RSM improved the biomass production of this strain in a more cost-effective way by creating an optimum medium. This result shows that B. animalis subsp lactis JNU306 may be used as a commercial starter culture in manufacturing probiotics, including dairy products.
Keywords
Bifidobacterium animalis; Medium; Yeast extract - Soy Peptone - Glucose (YPG); Optimization; Response surface methodology (RSM);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Liew S, Ariff AB, Raha AR, Ho YW. Optimization of medium composition for the production of a probiotic microorganism, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, using response surface methodology. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;102:137-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.009   DOI
2 Dave RI, Shah NP. Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and bifidobacteria. J Dairy Sci. 1996;79:1529-36. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76513-X   DOI
3 Ventura M, Canchaya C, Van Sinderen D, Fitzgerald GF, Zink R. Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 10140: identification of the atp (atpBEFHAGDC) operon and analysis of its genetic structure, characteristics, and phylogeny. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:3110-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.5.3110-3121.2004   DOI
4 Taipale T, Pienihakkinen K, Isolauri E, Larsen C, Brockmann E, Alanen P, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in reducing the risk of infections in infancy. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:409-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510003685   DOI
5 Stephenie W, Kabeir BM, Shuhaimi M, Rosfarizan M, Yazid AM. Growth optimization of a probiotic candidate, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum G4, in milk medium using response surface methodology. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2007;12:106-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03028634   DOI
6 Arunachalam KD. Role of bifidobacteria in nutrition, medicine and technology. Nutr Res. 1999;19:1559-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(99)00112-8   DOI
7 Masco L, Huys G, De Brandt E, Temmerman R, Swings J. Culture-dependent and culture-independent qualitative analysis of probiotic products claimed to contain bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;102:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.018   DOI
8 Barrangou R, Briczinski EP, Traeger LL, Loquasto JR, Richards M, Horvath P, et al. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 and Bl-04. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:4144-51. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00155-09   DOI
9 Sanchez B, Champomier-Verges MC, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Ruas-Madiedo P, Anglade P, Baraige F, et al. Adaptation and response of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis to bile: a proteomic and physiological approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6757-67. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00637-07   DOI
10 Sen R, Babu KS. Modeling and optimization of the process conditions for biomass production and sporulation of a probiotic culture. Process Biochem. 2007;40:2531-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03028634   DOI
11 SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.04. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1986.
12 Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta. 2008;76:965-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019   DOI
13 Ochi Y, Tomottari M. Studies on Lactobacilli. Jpn J Vet Sci. 1958;20:71-81. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms1939.20.71   DOI
14 Oh S, Rheem S, Sim J, Kim S, Baek Y. Optimizing conditions for the growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryptone-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:3809-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.61.11.3809-3814.1995   DOI
15 Kiviharju K, Leisola M, Eerikainen T. Optimization of a Bifidobacterium longum production process. J Biotechnol. 2005;117:299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.02.007   DOI
16 Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
17 Bezcorovainy A, Catchpole RM. Biochemistry and physiology of bifidobacteria. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 1989.
18 Rasic J, Kurmann JA. Bifidobacteria and their role: microbiological, nutritional-physiological, medical and technological aspects and bibliography. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag; 1983.
19 Khuri AI, Mukhopadhyay S. Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2010;2:128-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73   DOI
20 Brown M, Foster JHS. A simple diagnostic milk medium for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Pathol. 1970;23:172-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.23.2.172   DOI
21 Hussain SM, Naik M, Ahmed LA, Udipi M, Sukumaran SK. Bioprocess development for enhanced production of probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum. Current Sci. 2020;118:280-5.   DOI