Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e46

Coping with large litters: management effects on welfare and nursing capacity of the sow  

Peltoniemi, Olli (Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki)
Han, Taehee (Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki)
Yun, Jinhyeon (Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.63, no.2, 2021 , pp. 199-210 More about this Journal
Abstract
A number of management issues can be used as drivers for change in order to improve animal welfare and nursing capacity of the hyperprolific sow. Group housing of sows during gestation is a recommended practice from the perspective of animal welfare. Related health issues include reproductive health and the locomotor system. It appears that management of pregnant sows in groups is challenging for a producer and considerable skill is required. We explored the benefits and challenges of group housing, including feeding issues. Increasing litter size requires additional attention to the mammary gland and its ability to provide sufficient nursing for the growing litter. We discuss the fundamentals of mammary development and the specific challenges related to the hyperprolific sow. We also address challenges with the farrowing environment. It appears that the old-fashioned farrowing crate is not only outdated in terms of welfare from the public's perspective, but also fails to provide the environment that the sow needs to support her physiology of farrowing, nursing, and maternal behaviour. Studies from our group and others indicate that providing the sow with a loose housing system adequate in space and nesting material, along with reasonable chance for isolation, can be considered as fundamental for successful farrowing of the hyperprolific sow. It has also been shown that management strategies, such as split suckling and cross fostering, are necessary to ensure proper colostrum intake for all piglets born alive in a large litter. We thus conclude that welfare and nursing capacity of the sow can be improved by management. However, current megatrends such as the climate change may change sow management and force the industry to rethink goals of breeding and, for instance, breeding for better resilience may need to be included as goals for the future.
Keywords
Hyperprolific sow; Group housing; Parturition process; Feeding management; Colostrum management;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alexopoulos JG, Lines DS, Hallett S, Plush KJ. A review of success factors for piglet fostering in lactation. Animals. 2018;8:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8030038   DOI
2 Hales J, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF, Hansen CF. The effect of temporary confinement of hyperprolific sows in Sow Welfare and Piglet protection pens on sow behaviour and salivary cortisol concentrations. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2016;183:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.008   DOI
3 Damm BI, Moustsen V, Jorgensen E, Pedersen LJ, Heiskanen T, Forkman B. Sow preferences for walls to lean against when lying down. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;99:53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.014   DOI
4 Peltoniemi O, Bjorkman S, Oropeza-Moe M, Oliviero C. Developments of reproductive management and biotechnology in the pig. Anim Reprod. 2019;16:524-38. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0055   DOI
5 Kemp B, Da Silva CLA, Soede NM. Recent advances in pig reproduction: focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018;53:28-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13264   DOI
6 Uvnas-Moberg K, Johansson B, Lupoli B, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. Oxytocin facilitates behavioural, metabolic and physiological adaptations during lactation. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001;72:225-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00112-5   DOI
7 Yun J, Swan KM, Vienola K, Kim YY, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi OAT, et al. Farrowing environment has an impact on sow metabolic status and piglet colostrum intake in early lactation. Livest Sci. 2014;163:120-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.02.014   DOI
8 Uvnas-Moberg K. Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998;23:819-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00056-0   DOI
9 Andersen IL, Tajet GM, Haukvik IA, Kongsrud S, Boe KE. Relationship between postnatal piglet mortality, environmental factors and management around farrowing in herds with loose-housed, lactating sows. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2007;57:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700601159626   DOI
10 Baxter EM, Rutherford KM, D'eath RB, Arnott G, Turner SP, Sandoe P, et al. The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors. Anim Welf. 2013;22:219-38. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.219   DOI
11 Sorensen JT, Rousing T, Kudahl AB, Hansted HJ, Pedersen LJ. Do nurse sows and foster litters have impaired animal welfare? Results from a cross-sectional study in sow herds. Animal. 2016;10:681-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002104   DOI
12 Glencorse D, Plush K, Hazel S, D'souza D, Hebart M. Impact of non-confinement accommodation on farrowing performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of farrowing crates versus pens. Animals. 2019;9:957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110957   DOI
13 Oliviero C. Management to improve neonate piglet survival. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Pig Reproduction; 2013; Olsztyn, Poland. p. 203-10.
14 Kobek-Kjeldager C, Moustsen VA, Theil PK, Pedersen LJ. Effect of litter size, milk replacer and housing on production results of hyper-prolific sows. Animal. 2020;14:824-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111900260X   DOI
15 Castren H, Algers B, de Passille AM, Rushen J, Uvnas-Moberg K. Preparturient variation in progesterone, prolactin, oxytocin and somatostatin in relation to nest building in sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993;38:91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90059-X   DOI
16 Uvnas-Moberg K, Petersson M. Oxytocin, ein vermittler von antistress, wohlbefinden, sozialer interaktion, wachstum und heilung/Oxytocin, a mediator of anti-stress, well-being, social interaction, growth and healing. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2005;51:57-80. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2005.51.1.57   DOI
17 Chidgey KL, Morel PCH, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. Sow and piglet behavioral associations in farrowing pens with temporary crating and in farrowing crates. J Vet Behav. 2017;20:91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.003   DOI
18 Baxter EM, Andersen IL, Edwards SA. Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Adv Pig Welf. 2018;27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2   DOI
19 Pedersen ML, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF, Kristensen AR. Improved udder access prolongs duration of milk letdown and increases piglet weight gain. Livest Sci. 2011;140:253-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.001   DOI
20 Jarvis S, Reed BT, Lawrence AB, Calvert SK, Stevenson J. Peri-natal environmental effects on maternal behaviour, pituitary and adrenal activation, and the progress of parturition in the primiparous sow. Anim Welf. 2004;13:171-81.
21 Vasdal G, Ostensen I, Melisova M, Bozdechova B, Illmann G, Andersen IL. Management routines at the time of farrowing-effects on teat success and postnatal piglet mortality from loose housed sows. Livest Sci. 2011;136:225-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.012   DOI
22 Zanella AJ, Broom DM, Hunter JC, Mendl MT. Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiol Behav. 1996;59:769-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)02118-3   DOI
23 Baxter EM, Adeleye OO, Jack MC, Farish M, Ison SH, Edwards SA. Achieving optimum performance in a loose-housed farrowing system for sows: the effects of space and temperature. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;169:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.05.004   DOI
24 Melisova M, Illmann G, Chaloupkova H, Bozdechova B. Sow postural changes, responsiveness to piglet screams, and their impact on piglet mortality in pens and crates. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:3064-72. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7340   DOI
25 Jarvis S, Calvert SK, Stevenson J, van Leeuwen N, Lawrence AB. Pituitary-adrenal activation in pre-parturient pigs (Sus scrofa) is associated with behavioural restriction due to lack of space rather than nesting substrate. Anim Welf. 2002;11:371-84.
26 Oliviero C, Heinonen M, Valros A, Halli O, Peltoniemi OAT. Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;105:365-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.015   DOI
27 Yun J, Swan KM, Vienola K, Farmer C, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O, et al. Nest-building in sows: effects of farrowing housing on hormonal modulation of maternal characteristics. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2013;148:77-84.   DOI
28 Boyle LA, Leonard FC, Lynch PB, Brophy P. Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2002;76:119-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00211-8   DOI
29 Yun J, Swan KM, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O, Valros A. Effects of prepartum housing environment on abnormal behaviour, the farrowing process, and interactions with circulating oxytocin in sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;162:20-5.   DOI
30 Thodberg K, Jensen KH, Herskin MS, Jorgensen E. Influence of environmental stimuli on nest building and farrowing behaviour in domestic sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999;63:131-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00002-7   DOI
31 Cronin GM, Schirmer BN, McCallum TH, Smith JA, Butler KL. The effects of providing sawdust to pre-parturient sows in farrowing crates on sow behaviour, the duration of parturition and the occurrence of intra-partum stillborn piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993;36:301-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90128-C   DOI
32 Herskin MS, Jensen KH, Thodberg K. Influence of environmental stimuli on maternal behaviour related to bonding, reactivity and crushing of piglets in domestic sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;58:241-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00144-5   DOI
33 Peltoniemi O, Bjorkman S, Maes D. Reproduction of group-housed sows. Porc Health Manag. 2016;2:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0033-2   DOI
34 Andersen IL, Berg S, Boe KE. Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa) - purely accidental or a poor mother? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005;93:229-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.015   DOI
35 Pedersen LJ, Jorgensen E, Heiskanen T, Damm BI. Early piglet mortality in loose-housed sows related to sow and piglet behaviour and to the progress of parturition. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;96:215-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.016   DOI
36 Taverne MAM, Naaktgeboren C, Elsaesser F, Forsling ML, van der Weyden GC, Ellendorff F, et al. Myometrial electrical activity and plasma concentrations of progesterone, estrogens and oxytocin during late pregnancy and parturition in the miniature pig. Biol Reprod. 1979;21:1125-34. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod21.5.1125   DOI
37 Maes D, Pluym L, Peltoniemi O. Impact of group housing of pregnant sows on health. Porc Health Manag. 2016;2:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0032-3   DOI
38 Decaluwe R, Maes D, Declerck I, Cools A, Wuyts B, De Smet S, et al. Changes in back fat thickness during late gestation predict colostrum yield in sows. Animal. 2013;7:1999-2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001791   DOI
39 VanKlompenberg MK, Manjarin R, Trott JF, McMicking HF, Hovey RC. Late gestational hyperprolactinemia accelerates mammary epithelial cell differentiation that leads to increased Milk yield. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1102-11. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5903   DOI
40 Wagner KU, Young W, Liu X, Ginns E, Li M, Furth P, et al. Oxytocin and milk removal are required for post-partum mammary-gland development. Genes Funct. 1997;1:233-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4624.1997.00024.x   DOI
41 Wischner D, Kemper N, Krieter J. Nest-building behaviour in sows and consequences for pig husbandry. Livest Sci. 2009;124:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.01.015   DOI
42 Yun J, Valros A. Benefits of prepartum nest-building behaviour on parturition and lactation in sows-a review. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2015;11:1519. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0174   DOI
43 Lawrence AB, McLean KA, Jarvis S, Gilbert CL, Petherick JC. Stress and parturition in the pig. Reprod Domest Anim. 1997;32:231-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1997.tb01287.x   DOI
44 Yun J, Swan KM, Farmer C, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O, Valros A. Prepartum nest-building has an impact on postpartum nursing performance and maternal behaviour in early lactating sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014;160:31-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.011   DOI
45 Hurley WL. Mammary gland growth in the lactating sow. Livest Prod Sci. 2001;70:149-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00208-1   DOI
46 Oravainen J, Heinonen M, Seppa-Lassila L, Orro T, Tast A, Virolainen JV, et al. Factors affecting fertility in loosely housed sows and gilts: vulvar discharge syndrome, environment and acute-phase proteins. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006;41:549-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00713.x   DOI
47 Yun J, Han T, Bjorkman S, Nysten M, Hasan S, Valros A, et al. Factors affecting piglet mortality during the first 24 h after the onset of parturition in large litters: effects of farrowing housing on behaviour of postpartum sows. Animal. 2019;13:1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002549   DOI
48 Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O. Troubled process of parturition of the domestic pig. In: Aral F, Payan-Carreira R, Quaresma M. Animal reproduction in veterinary medicine. London: IntechOpen; 2020.
49 Tuyttens FAM, van Gansbeke S, Ampe B. Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:845-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2978   DOI
50 Munsterhjelm C, Valros A, Heinonen M, Halli O, Peltoniemi OAT. Housing during early pregnancy affects fertility and behaviour of sows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008;4:584-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00956.x   DOI
51 Moustsen VA, Lahrmann HP, D'Eath RB. Relationship between size and age of modern hyper-prolific crossbred sows. Livest Sci. 2011;141:272-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.008   DOI
52 Kim KH, Hosseindoust A, Ingale SL, Lee SH, Noh HS, Choi YH, et al. Effects of gestational housing on reproductive performance and behavior of sows with different backfat thickness. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29:142-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0973   DOI
53 Algers B, Uvnas-Moberg K. Maternal behavior in pigs. Horm Behav. 2007;52:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.022   DOI
54 Seguin MJ, Barney D, Widowski TM. Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows: effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence of superficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance. J Swine Health Prod. 2006;14:89-96.
55 Jensen P. Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1986;16:131-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(86)90105-X   DOI
56 Karlen GAM, Hemsworth PH, Gonyou HW, Fabrega E, David Strom A, Smits RJ. The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007;105:87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.014   DOI
57 Bates RO, Edwards DB, Korthals RL. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls. Livest Prod Sci. 2003;79:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00119-7   DOI
58 Morgan L, Klement E, Novak S, Eliahoo E, Younis A, Abells Sutton G, et al. Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows. Prev Vet Med. 2018;160:10-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.026   DOI
59 Ferket, SL, Hacker, RR. Effect of forced exercise during gestation on reproductive performance of sows. Can J Anim Sci. 1985;65:851-9. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas85-100   DOI
60 Rutherford KMD, Baxter EM, D'Eath RB, Turner SP, Arnott G, Roehe R, et al. The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biologica factors. Anim Welf. 2013;22:199-218. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.199   DOI
61 Spoolder HAM, Vermeer HM. Gestation group housing of sows. Gestating Lact Sow. 2015;47-72. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_3   DOI
62 Farmer C, Hurley WL. Mammary development. Gestating Lact Sow. 2015;193-216. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_4   DOI