Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.801

Rumen fermentation, methane production, and microbial composition following in vitro evaluation of red ginseng byproduct as a protein source  

Hamid, Muhammad Mahboob Ali (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
Moon, Joonbeom (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
Yoo, Daekyum (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
Kim, Hanbeen (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
Lee, Yoo Kyung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Song, Jaeyong (Institute of Livestock)
Seo, Jakyeom (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.62, no.6, 2020 , pp. 801-811 More about this Journal
Abstract
The main objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate red ginseng byproduct (RGP) as a protein resource and its effects on rumen fermentation characteristics, microflora, CO2, and CH4 production in ruminants. Four treatments for in vitro fermentation using buffered rumen fluid over a 48 h incubation period were used: 1, RGP; 2, corn gluten feed (CGF); 3, wheat gluten (WG); and 4, corn germ meal. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), in vitro crude protein digestibility (IVCPD), volatile fatty acids, pH, and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) were estimated after 48 h incubation. Gas production was investigated after 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. The CO2 and CH4 were evaluated after 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. A significant difference in total gas production and CO2 emissions was observed (p < 0.01) at all incubation times. CH4 production in RGP were higher (p < 0.05) than that in other treatments but a higher CH4 portion in the total gas production was observed in WG (p < 0.05) at 48 h incubation. The IVDMD, IVNDFD, and IVCPD of RGP was lower than those of other conventional ingredients (p < 0.01). The RGP had the lowest NH3-N value among the treatments (p < 0.01). The RGP also had the lowest total VFA concentration (p < 0.01), but presented the highest acetate proportion and acetate to propionate ratio among the treatments (both, p < 0.01). The abundance of Prevotella ruminicola was higher in RGP than in WG (p < 0.01), whereas RGP has lower methanogenic archaea (p < 0.01). In conclusion, based on the nutritive value, IVDMD, low NH3-N, and decreased methanogenic archaea, RGP inclusion as a protein source in ruminant diets can be an option in replacing conventional feed sources.
Keywords
Red ginseng byproduct; In vitro fermentation; Methane production; Microbial community;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Carrera RAB, Veloso CM, Knupp LS, de Souza Junior AH, Detmann E, de Paula Lana R. Protein co-products and by-products of the biodiesel industry for ruminants feeding. Rev Bras Zootec. 2012;41:1202-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000500018   DOI
2 Cronje PB, Nolan JV, Leng RA. Acetate clearance rate as a potential index of the availability of glucogenic precursors in ruminants fed on roughage-based diets. Br J Nutr. 1991;66:301-12. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19910033   DOI
3 Russell JB. The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:3222-30. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75886-2   DOI
4 Salami SA, Luciano G, O'Grady MN, Biondi L, Newbold CJ, Kerry JP, et al. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: a review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2019;251:37-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006   DOI
5 Flint HJ, Duncan SH. Bacteroides and prevotella. In: Batt CA, Tortorella ML, editors. Encyclopedia of food microbiology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2014. p. 203-8.
6 Kim MH, Song YE, Song HB, Kim JW, Hwang SJ. Evaluation of food waste disposal options by LCC analysis from the perspective of global warming: Jungnang case, South Korea. Waste Manage. 2011;31:2112-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.019   DOI
7 Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS. Application of waste-derived proteins in the animal feed industry. In: Dhillon GS, editor. Protein byproducts. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2016. p. 161-92.
8 Loy DD, Lundy EL. Nutritional properties and feeding value of corn and its coproducts. In: Corn: chemistry and technology. 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: AACC International; 2019. p. 633-59.
9 Szeto YT, Wong JW, Wong SC, Pak SC, Benzie IF. DNA protective effect of ginseng and the antagonistic effect of Chinese turnip: a preliminary study. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011;66:97-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-011-0209-5   DOI
10 Kim KH, Kim HJ, Joo JW, Lee SR, Kim DS, Maeng WJ. Effects of substitution level of ginseng meal for alfalfa hay on the ruminal fermentation characteristics in vitro. Korean J Anim Nutr Feedst 1994;18:481-90.
11 Kang HK, Park SB, Kim CH. Effect of dietary supplementation of red ginseng by-product on laying performance, blood biochemistry, serum immunoglobulin and microbial population in laying hens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29:1464-9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0664   DOI
12 Sylvester JT, Karnati SKR, Yu Z, Morrison M, Firkins JL. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J Nutr. 2004;134:3378-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.12.3378   DOI
13 Ha JK, Kim SW, Kim WY. Use of agro-industrial by-products as animal feeds in Korea [Internet]. 1999 [cite 2020 Aug 4]. https://fftc.org.tw/htmlarea_file/library/20110716010615/eb423. pdf
14 Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2   DOI
15 Loor JJ, Elolimy AA, McCann JC. Dietary impacts on rumen microbiota in beef and dairy production. Anim Front. 2016;6:22-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2016-0030   DOI
16 Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994;48:185-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6   DOI
17 Kim YJ, Lee GD, Choi IH. Effects of dietary red ginseng marc on egg production, egg quality and blood characteristics of laying hens. J Appl Anim Res. 2015;43:242-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2014.928637   DOI
18 Seo J, Jung JK, Seo S. Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1343. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1343   DOI
19 AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists] International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2005.
20 Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Washington, DC: USDA Agricultural Research Service; 1970.
21 Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962;8:130-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130   DOI
22 Whelan JA, Russell NB, Whelan MA. A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. J Immunol Methods. 2003;278:261-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00223-0   DOI
23 Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. BioTechniques. 2004;36:808-12. https://doi.org/10.2144/04365ST04   DOI
24 Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Development of a real‐time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;58:572-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x   DOI
25 Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7115-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00739-09   DOI
26 Pozdisek J, Vaculova K. Study of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) quality for feeding ruminants using in vitro and in vivo methods. Czech J Anim Sci. 2008;53:253-64. https://doi.org/10.17221/359-CJAS   DOI
27 Ao X, Meng QW, Kim IH. Effects of fermented red ginseng supplemenetation on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, blood hematology and meat quality in finishing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2011;24:525-31. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10397   DOI
28 Getachew G, DePeters EJ, Robinson PH. In vitro gas production provides effective methods for assessing ruminant feeds. Calif Agric. 2004;58:54-8. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v058n01p54   DOI
29 Alam MJ, Mamuad LL, Kim SH, Jeong CD, Sung HG, Cho SB, et al. Effect of phytogenic feed additives in soybean meal on in vitro swine fermentation for odor reduction and bacterial community comparison. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013;26:266-74. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12511   DOI
30 Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2004;111:57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00217-7   DOI
31 Aregheore EM. Chemical composition and nutritive value of some tropical by-product feedstuffs for small ruminants-in vivo and in vitro digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2000;85:99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00123-1   DOI
32 Lee SM, Bae BS, Park HW, Ahn NG, Cho BG, Cho YL, et al. Characterization of Korean Red Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer): history, preparation method, and chemical composition. J Ginseng Res. 2015;39:384-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2015.04.009   DOI
33 Neece CE, Risty L. High density, energy component-added pelletized agricultural processing byproducts for animal feed. United States patent US20070172540A1. 2007 Jul 26.
34 Oba M, Allen MS. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:589-96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9   DOI
35 Tsiplakou E, Yiasoumis L, Maragou AC, Mavrommatis A, Sotirakoglou K, Moatsou G, et al. The response of goats to different starch/NDF ratios of concentrates on the milk chemical composition, fatty acid profile, casein fractions and rennet clotting properties. Small Rumin Res. 2017;156:82-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.09.015   DOI