Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.3.154

Effects of dietary energy and protein levels on reproductive performance in gestating sows and growth of their progeny  

Fang, Lin Hu (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Jin, Ying Hai (Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University)
Jeong, Jae Hark (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Hong, Jin Su (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Chung, Woo Lim (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Kim, Yoo Yong (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.61, no.3, 2019 , pp. 154-162 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary energy and crude protein (CP) levels on reproductive performance, litter performance, milk quality, and blood profiles in gestating sows. A total of 59 multiparous sows (Yorkshire ${\times}$ Landrace) with similar body weights (BW), backfat thickness (BF), and parity were assigned to one of six treatments with 9 or 10 sows per treatment using a $2{\times}3$ factorial arrangement and completely randomized design. The first factor was two levels of dietary metabolizable energy (ME) density (13.40 or 13.82 MJ/kg) and the second factor was three dietary protein levels based from 35 day in gestating phases (10.5%, 12%, and 13.5%). Backfat thickness change in lactating sows decreased linearly as CP level increased (p = 0.03). Increased energy level in the gestating sow diet tended to increase the total number of piglets born (p = 0.07), but piglet weight decreased (p = 0.02). Dietary CP level had a negative effect on colostrum quality. Casein, protein, total solid, and solids-not-fat concentrations decreased linearly and lactose level increased linearly as CP level in the gestating sow diet increased (casein%: p = 0.03; protein%: p = 0.04; lactose%: p = 0.06; total solids: p = 0.03; solid-not-fat: p = 0.03, respectively). However, improving ME by 0.42 MJ/kg had no significant effect on the chemical composition of sow colostrum. There were no significant differences in blood glucose concentration in gestating sows when sows were fed different levels of energy during gestation, but blood glucose increased at 21 day of lactation when energy increased by 0.42 MJ/kg (p = 0.04). Blood urea nitrogen concentration increased linearly when dietary CP levels increased at 110 day in gestation, 24-hours postpartum, and 21 days of lactation (linear, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively), and it also increased when dietary energy increased at 110 days of gestation and 24-hours postpartum (p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). A gestating sow diet containing 13.82 MJ/kg ME and 10.5% CP can improve reproductive performance, litter performance, and colostrum quality.
Keywords
Energy; Crude protein; Reproductive performance; Litter performance; Blood profiles; Gestating sows;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kraeling RR, Webel SK. 2015. Current strategies for reproductive management of gilts and sows in North America. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2015;6:3.   DOI
2 AHDB Pork. 2015. The BPEX yearbook 2014-2015. https://pork.ahdb.org.uk/media/73777/bpex-yearbook-2015.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2018.
3 Choe JH, Yang HS, Lee SH, Go GW. Characteristics of pork belly consumption in South Korea and their health implication. J Anim Sci Technol. 2015;57:22.   DOI
4 Boyd RD, Touchette KJ, Castro GC, Johnston ME, Lee KU, Han IK. Recent advances in amino acid and energy nutrition of prolific sows. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2000;13:1638-52.   DOI
5 Ji F, Wu G, Blanton JR Jr, Kim SW. Changes in weight and composition in various tissues of pregnant gilts and their nutritional implications. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:366-75.   DOI
6 Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
7 Trottier NL, Johnston LJ. Feeding gilts during development and sows during gestation and lactation. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press; 2001. p. 725-69.
8 Cerisuelo A, Baucells MD, Gasa J, Coma J, Carrion D, Chapinal N, et al. Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:729-39.   DOI
9 Revell DK, Williams IH, Mullan BP, Ranford JL, Smits RJ. Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous sows: I. Voluntary feed intake, weight loss, and plasma metabolites. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:1729-37.   DOI
10 Messias de Braganca M, Mounier AM, Prunier A. Does feed restriction mimic the effects of increased ambient temperature in lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:2017-24.   DOI
11 Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, Ji F. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:E123-32.   DOI
12 Pettigrew JE, Yang H. Protein nutrition of gestating sows. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:2723-30.   DOI
13 Jang YD, Jang SK, Kim DH, Oh HK, Kim YY. Effects of dietary protein levels for gestating gilts on reproductive performance, blood metabolites and milk composition. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2014;27:83-92.   DOI
14 Kusina J, Pettigrew JE, Sower AF, White ME, Crooker BA, Hathaway MR. Effect of protein intake during gestation and lactation on lactational performance of the primiparous sow. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:931-41.   DOI
15 Head RH, Williams IH. Mammogenesis is influenced by the nutrition of gilts during pregnancy. In: Manipulating pig production III. Batterham ES, editor. Aust Pig Sci Assoc; 1991. p. 33.
16 Svajgr AJ, Hammell DL, DeGetter MJ, Hays VW, Cromwell GL, Dutt RH. Reproductive performance of sows on a protein-restricted diet. J Reprod Fert. 1972;30:455-8.   DOI
17 Dourmad JY. Effect of feeding level in the gilt during pregnancy on voluntary feed intake during lactation and changes in body composition during gestation and lactation. Livest Prod Sci. 1991;27:309-19.   DOI
18 Baker DH, Becker DE, Jensen AH, Harman BG. Reproductive performance and progeny development in swine as influenced by protein restriction during various portions of gestation. J Anim Sci. 1970;31:526-30.   DOI
19 Kusina J, Pettigrew JE, Sower AF, White ME, Crooker BA, Hathaway MR. Effect of protein intake during gestation and lactation on the lactational performance of primiparous sows. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:931-41.   DOI
20 Long HF, Ju WS, Piao LG, Kim YY. Effect of dietary energy levels of gestating sows on physiological parameters and reproductive performance. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2010;23:1080-8.   DOI
21 Baidoo SK, Aherne FX, Kirkwood RN, Foxcroft GR. Effect of feed intake during lactation and after weaning on sow reproductive performance. Can J Anim Sci. 1992;72:911-7.   DOI
22 Averette GL, See MT, Hansen JA, Sutton D, Odle J. The effects of dietary fat sources, levels, and feeding intervals on pork fatty acid composition. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:1606-15.   DOI
23 Mahan DC. Relationship of gestation protein and feed intake level over a five-parity period using a high-producing sow genotype. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:533-41.   DOI
24 King RH, Williams HI. The effects of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first litter sows 2. Protein and energy intakes during lactation. Anim Sci. 1984;38:249-56.   DOI
25 Klobasa F, Werhahn E, Butler JE. Composition of sow milk during lactation. J Anim Sci. 1987;64:1458-66.   DOI
26 Foxcroft GR, Aherne FX, Clowes EC, Miller H, Zak LJ. Sow fertility: the role of suckling inhibition and metabolic status. In: Ivan M, editor. Animal science research and development: moving toward a new century. Ottawa, ON: Centre for Food and Animal Research; 1995. p. 377-93.
27 Frobish LT, Steele NC, Davey RJ. Long term effect of energy intake on reproductive performance of swine. J Anim Sci. 1973;36:293-7.   DOI
28 Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
29 Devillers N, van Milgen J, Prunier A, Le Dividich J. Estimation of colostrum intake in the neonatal pig. Anim Sci. 2004;78:305-13.   DOI
30 Rooke JA, Sinclair AG, Edwards SA, Cordoba R, Pkiyach S, Penny PC, et al. The effect of feeding salmon oil to sows throughout pregnancy on pre-weaning mortality of piglets. Anim Sci. 2016;73:489-500.
31 Whang KY, Easter RA. Blood urea nitrogen as an index of feed efficiency and lean growth potential in growing-finishing swine. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2000;13:811-6.   DOI
32 Elliott RF, Vander Noot GW, Gilbreath RL, Fisher H. Effect of dietary protein level on composition changes in sow colostrum and milk. J Anim Sci. 1971;32:1128-37.   DOI
33 Cozler YL, David C, Beaumal V, Johansen S, Dourmad JY. Effect of the feeding level during rearing on performance of large white gilts. Part 2: effect on metabolite profiles during gestation and lactation, and on glucose tolerance. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1998;38:377-90.   DOI
34 Wu G, Morris SM Jr. Arginine metabolism: Nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem J. 1998;336:1-17.   DOI
35 Fuller MF, Weekes TEC, Cadenhead A, Bruce JB. The protein-sparing effect of carbohydrate. 2. The role of insulin. Br J Nutr. 1977;38:489-96.   DOI