Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.2.55

Evaluation of synbiotics as gut health improvement agents against Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from the pig  

Kim, Bo-Ra (Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University)
Cho, Kyung Jin (Genebiotech Co., Ltd.)
Kim, Doowan (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Cho, Jin Ho (Division of Food and Animal Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Lee, Jun Hyung (Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University)
Guevarra, Robin B. (Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University)
Lee, Sun Hee (Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University)
Kang, Jung Sun (Genebiotech Co., Ltd.)
Cho, Won Tak (Genebiotech Co., Ltd.)
Wattanaphansak, Suphot (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University)
Kang, Bit Na (Abbvie Bioresearch Center)
Kim, Jong Nam (Department of Beef Science, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Song, Minho (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Hyeun Bum (Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.61, no.2, 2019 , pp. 55-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
Colibacillosis is one of the major health problems in young piglets resulting in poor health and death caused by Escherichia coli producing F18 pili and Shiga toxin 2e. It is pivotal to reduce colibacillosis in weaned piglets to enhance production performance. In this study, we evaluated synbiotics as the gut health improvement agents in the mouse model challenged with Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) isolated from piglets. Prebiotic lactulose was formulated with each $5.0{\times}10^6CFU/mL$ of Pediococcus acidilactici GB-U15, Lactobacillus plantarum GB-U17, and Lactobacillus plantarum GB 1-3 to produce 3 combinations of synbiotics. A total of 40 three weeks old BALB/c mice were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 10): a control group and 3 synbiotics treated groups. Each treatment groups were daily administrated with $5.0{\times}10^6CFU/mL$ of one synbiotics for the first week, and every 3 days during the second week. All the mice were challenged with $8.0{\times}10^8CFU/mL$ of STEC 5 days after animals began to receive synbiotics. Mice treated with synbiotics based on Pediococcus acidilactici GB-U15 and Lactobacillus plantarum GB-U17 significantly improved daily weight gain compared to mice in other groups. While mice treated with GB-U15 showed better fecal index, no significant differences were observed among groups. Gross lesion and histopathological evaluations showed that mice treated with GB-U15 moderately improved recovery from STEC infection. In conclusion, our results suggest that the synbiotics formulated with lactulose and Pediococcus acidilactici GB-U15 have potential benefits to prevent and improve colibacillosis in weaned piglets.
Keywords
Escherichia coli; Gut health; Pig; Synbiotics;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aureli P, Capurso L, Castellazzi AM, Clerici M, Giovannini M, Morelli L, et al. Probiotics and health: an evidence-based review. Pharmacol Res. 2011;63:366-76.   DOI
2 Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPD, Spier MR, Medeiros ABP, Yamaguishi CT, Lindner JD, et al. The potential of probiotics: a review. Food Technol Biotech. 2010;48:413-34.
3 Piva A, Casadei G, Gatta PP, Luchansky JB, Biagi G. Effect of lactitol, lactic acid bacteria, or their combinations (synbiotic) on intestinal proteolysis in vitro, and on feed efficiency in weaned pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 2005;85:345-53.   DOI
4 Yang Q, Huang X, Zhao S, Sun W, Yan Z, Wang P, et al. Structure and function of the fecal microbiota in diarrheic neonatal piglets. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:502.
5 Tran THT, Everaert N, Bindelle J. Review on the effects of potential prebiotics on controlling intestinal enteropathogens Salmonella and Escherichia coli in pig production. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018;102:17-32.   DOI
6 Guevarra RB, Hong SH, Cho JH, Kim BR, Shin J, Lee JH, et al. The dynamics of the piglet gut microbiome during the weaning transition in association with health and nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9:54.   DOI
7 Gaggia F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;141 Suppl 1:S15-28.   DOI
8 Ahmed ST, Hoon J, Mun HS, Yang CJ. Evaluation of Lactobacillus and Bacillus-based probiotics as alternatives to antibiotics in enteric microbial challenged weaned piglets. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8:96-104.   DOI
9 Djouzi Z, Andrieux C, Degivry MC, Bouley C, Szylit O. The association of yogurt starters with Lactobacillus casei DN 114.001 in fermented milk alters the composition and metabolism of intestinal microflora in germ-free rats and in human flora-associated rats. J Nutr. 1997;127:2260-6.   DOI
10 Shim SB, Verstegen MWA, Kim IH, Kwon OS, Verdonk JMAJ. Effects of feeding antibiotic-free creep feed supplemented with oligofructose, probiotics or synbiotics to suckling piglets increases the preweaning weight gain and composition of intestinal microbiota. Arch Anim Nutr. 2005;59:419-27.   DOI
11 Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:658-72.   DOI
12 Callaway TR, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Harvey RB, Genovese KJ, Kennedy CN, et al. Probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion for prophylaxis against bacterial disease. Anim Health Res Rev. 2008;9:217-25.   DOI
13 Apley MD, Bush EJ, Morrison RB, Singer RS, Snelson H. Use estimates of in-feed antimicrobials in swine production in the United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9:272-9.   DOI
14 Michael GB, Kadlec K, Sweeney MT, Brzuszkiewicz E, Liesegang H, Daniel R, et al. ICEPmu1, an integrative conjugative element (ICE) of Pasteurella multocida: analysis of the regions that comprise 12 antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:84-90.   DOI
15 Allen HK, Levine UY, Looft T, Bandrick M, Casey TA. Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:114-9.   DOI
16 Meng QW, Yan L, Ao X, Zhou TX, Wang JP, Lee JH, et al. Influence of probiotics in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and blood characteristics in growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3320-6.   DOI
17 Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. 1995;125:1401-12.   DOI
18 Guevarra RB, Lee JH, Lee SH, Seok MJ, Kim DW, Kang BN, et al. Piglet gut microbial shifts early in life: causes and effects. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:1.   DOI
19 Bratz K, Golz G, Janczyk P, Nockler K, Alter T. Analysis of in vitro and in vivo effects of probiotics against Campylobacter spp. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2015;128:155-62.
20 Stanton TB. A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:111-3.   DOI
21 Roberfroid MB. Prebiotics and synbiotics: concepts and nutritional properties. Br J Nutr. 1998;80:S197-202.   DOI
22 Zeyner A, Boldt E. Effects of a probiotic enterococcus faecium strain supplemented from birth to weaning on diarrhoea patterns and performance of piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006;90:25-31.   DOI
23 Nemcova R, Bomba A, Gancarcikova S, Herich R, Guba P. Study of the effect of Lactobacillus paracasei and fructooligosaccharides on the faecal microflora in weanling piglets. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1999;112:225-8.
24 Bomba A, Nemcova R, Gancarcikova S, Herich R, Guba P, Mudronova D. Improvement of the probiotic effect of microorganisms by their combination with maltodextrins, fructooligosaccharides and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Br J Nutr. 2002;88 Suppl 1:S95-9.   DOI
25 Alexopoulos C, Georgoulakis IE, Tzivara A, Kritas SK, Siochu A, Kyriakis SC. Field evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis spores, on the health status and performance of sows and their litters. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2004;88:381-92.   DOI