Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.4.263

Effects of Origins of Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Fecal Microflora of Growing Pigs  

Ku, Yun (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Ingale, Santosh Laxman (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Jin Soo (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Su Hyup (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Young Hwa (Department of Animal Resources Development, Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Chae, Byung Jo (Department of Animal Resources Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.55, no.4, 2013 , pp. 263-272 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of soybean meal (SBM) of different origin (Korea, India or Brazil) on performance, fecal microflora and economics of grower pigs. A total of 144 grower pigs (initial BW, 10.4 kg) were randomly allotted to six treatments on the basis of BW. Pig's diets containing SBM were formulated based on the total amino acid (TAA) or true ileal digestible amino acid (TIDAA) levels. Pigs fed domestic SBM diets had greater (p<0.05) overall ADG, ADFI and final body weight and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM, GE and CP (phases I, II and III) than those fed diets containing SBM originated from India or Brazil. Moreover, greater (p<0.05) ADG, ADFI, feed /gain (F/G), and ATTD of DM, GE and CP were observed in response to diets formulated on a TIDDA basis when compared with those formulated on a TAA basis. The fecal microflora was not affected (p>0.05) by dietary treatments. The overall feed cost per kg body weight gain was less (p<0.05) for diets formulated using domestic SBM than for those containing SBM from India, while the feed cost per kg body weight gain was less (p<0.05) for diets formulated prepared on a TIDAA than a TAA basis. These results indicate that domestic SBM has better quality than SBM imported from Brazil or India and better performance was obtained when diets were formulated based on the true ileal digestible amino acid (TIDAA) content.
Keywords
Soybean meal; Growth performance; Nutrient digestibility; Fecal microflora; Growing pig;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shim, Y. H., Shinde, P. L., Choi, J. Y., Kim, J. S., Seo, D. K., Pak, J. I., Chae, B. J. and Kwon. I. K. 2010. Evaluation of multi-microbial probiotics produced by submerged liquid and solid substrate fermentation methods in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 23:521-529.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
2 Thakur, M. and Hurburgh, C. R. 2007. Quality of US soybean compared to the quality of soybean meal from other origins. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 84:835-843.   DOI
3 Wang, J. P., Hong, S. M., Yan, L., Cho, J. H., Lee, H. S. and Kim, I. H. 2011. The evaluation of soybean meals from 3 major soybean-producing countries on productive performance and feeding value of pig diets. J. Anim. Sci. 89:2768-2773.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Grieshop, C. M., Kadzere, C. T., Clapper, G. M., Flickinger, E. A., Bauer, L. L., Frazier, R. L. and Fahey, G. C. Jr. 2003. Chemical and nutritional characteristics of United States soybeans and soybean meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:7684-7691.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Karr-Lilienthal, L. K., Kadzere, C. T., Grieshop, C. M., Fahey, G. C. Jr. 2005. Chemical and nutritional properties of soybean carbohydrates as related to non-ruminants: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97:1-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kim, I. H., Hancock, J. D., Jones, D. B. and Reddy, P. G. 1999. Extrusion processing of low-inhibitor soybeans improves growth performance of early-weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1251-1257.   DOI
7 Kumar, V., Rani, A., Goyal, L., Dixit, A. K., Manjaya, G. J., Dev, J. and Swamy, M. 2010. Sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in soybean genotype and growing location. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 58:5081-5085.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Line, E. J., Bailey, S. J., Cox, N. A., Stern, N. J. and Tompkins, T. 1998. Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poult. Sci. 77:405-410.   DOI
9 NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements for Swine. 10th ed., National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
10 Park, H. S. and Hurburgh, C. R. Jr. 2002. Improving the U.S. position in world soybean meal trade. MATRIC Working Paper 02-MWP 7. Accessed May 10, 2009. http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/02mwp7.pdf.
11 ASA. 2010. Soy Stats, A Reference Guide to Important Soybean Facts and Figures; http://www.soystats.com/2010/Default-frames.htm, American Soybean Association, St. Louis, MO.
12 Pascual, M., Hugas, M., Badiola, J. I., Monfort, J. M. and Garriga, M. 1999: Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4981-4986.
13 Qin, G. X., Verstegen, M. W. A. and van der Poel, A. F. B. 1998. Effect of temperature and time during steam treatment on the protein quality of full-fat soybeans from different origins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 77:393-398.   DOI
14 Sauer, W. C. and Ozimek, L. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. Livest. Prod. Sci. 15:367-388.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Baize, J. C. 1997. Results of USB study on SBM quality released. Soybean Meal Info Source 1:1-4.
16 Baker, K. M. and Stein, H. H. 2009. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2282-2290.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Choi, J. Y., Shinde P. L., Ingale S. L., Kim J. S., Kim Y. W., Kim K. H., Kwon I. K. and Chae B. J. 2011. Evaluation of multi-microbe probiotics prepared by submerged liquid or solid substrate fermentation and antibiotics in weaning pigs. Livest. Sci. 138:144-151.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Cromwell, G. L. 2000. Utilization of soy products in swine diets, In: Soy in animal nutrition, Drackley J.K. (Ed), Fed. Ani. Sci. Soc., Savoy, Illinois, US, pp 258-282.
19 AOAC. 2007. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. AOAC Int., Gaithersburg, MD.
20 Fenton, T. W. and Fenton, M. 1979. An improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634.   DOI
21 Arba, M. and Dale, N. M. 1990. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of over processing of soybean meal. Poult. Sci. 69:76-83.   DOI
22 Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.   DOI
23 Grieshop, C. M. and Fahey, G. C. Jr. 2001. Comparison of quality characteristics of soybean meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60:437-442.