Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2011.53.5.481

Effects of Rearing Densities on Behavior Characteristics in Korean Native Broilers  

Ha, Jae-Jung (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Rhee, Yong-Joon (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Byong-Chon (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Ohh, Sang-Jip (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Song, Young-Han (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.53, no.5, 2011 , pp. 481-487 More about this Journal
Abstract
Rearing density is a major factor in welfare production and health of broiler chicks. An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of rearing density on the behavioral characteristics of Korean native chicks. In the study, 20, 30, and 40 chicks per pen (3.17 $m^2$) were used in each treatment and randomly allotted to 6.3 bird/$m^2$, 9.5 bird/$m^2$, and 12.6 bird/$m^2$ density, respectively. The broilers' behavior was recorded for 12 hours continuously during 1 to 8 weeks of age. The time budgets (standing, sitting, and walking) and frequencies of certain behaviors (drinking, feeding, preening, scratching, dust bathing, flapping, aggressive pecking, and pecking) in the broilers were checked during the day. The behavioral characteristics in the early period (1 to 4 weeks) were compared to the later period (5 to 8 weeks) to know the changes in each behavior as the chicks matured. It was observed that 40 chicks per pen showed significant decrease in feed intake and body weight. Corticosterone hormone was higher in the order of 12.6 bird/$m^2$ > 9.5 bird/$m^2$ > 6.3 bird/$m^2$ (p<0.05). The behaviors of standing and sitting were the highest in groups of 30 and 40 respectively. The walking behavior was gradually decreased as rearing density increased. The frequencies of the other behaviors also decreased in a high density treatment; especially for feeding, drinking, preening, and pecking. These tendencies widened the gaps of behaviors as time passed. It was concluded that a group of 20 chicks (6.3 bird/$m^2$) was the proper rearing density among these three treatments. Broilers in the lower rearing density showed more activity than that with higher density and therefore this environment may lead to better welfare condition.
Keywords
Rearing density; Group size; Welfare; Korean native broilers;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Meluzzi, A., Fabbri, C., Folegatii, E. and Sirri, F. 2008. Effect of less intensive rearing conditions on little characteristics, growth performance, carcass injuries and meat quality of broilers. Br. Poult. Sic. 49:509-515.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Newberry, R. C. and Hall, J. W. 1990. Use of pen space by broiler chickens: Effects of age and pen size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 25:125-136.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sanotra, G. S., Lund, J. D. and Vestergaard, K. S. 2002. Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and occurrence of chronic fear in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:344-354.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Shanawany, M. M. 1988. Broiler performance under high stocking densities. Br. Poult. Sci. 29(1):43-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dawkins, M. S., Donnelly, C. A. and Jones, T. A. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427:342-344.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Desire, L., Boissy, A. and Veissier, I. 2002. Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav. Processes 60:165-180.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Dozier, W., Thaxton, J., Branton, S., Morgan, G., Miles, D., Roush, W., Lott, B. and Vizzier-Thaxton, Y. 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poult. Sci. 84:1332-1338.
8 Duncan, I. 1998. Behavior and behavioral needs. Poult. Sci. 77:1766-1772.
9 Estevez, I. 2007. Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits? Poult. Sci. 86:1265-1272.
10 Feddes, J., Emmanuel, E. and Zuidhoft, M. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult. Sci. 81:774-779.
11 Ha, J. J., Rhee, Y. J., Kim, B. C., Ohh, S. J. and Song, Y. H. 2010. A Review of Welfare Chicken Farming System. J. Lives. Hous. & Env., 16(3):181-192.   과학기술학회마을
12 Heckert, R., Estevez, I., Russek-Cohen, E. and Pettit-Riley, R. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:451-457.
13 Bizeray, D., Estevez, I., Leterrier, C. and Faure, J. M., 2002. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79:27-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bilcík, B. and Keeling, L. J. 2000. Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:55-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Botreau, R., Bracke, M. B. M., Perny, P., Butterworth A., Capdeville, J., Van Reenen, C. G. and Veissier, I. 2007. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: Analysis of constraints. Animal 1:1188-1197.
16 Buijs, S., Keeling, L., Rettenbacher, S., Van Poucke, E. and Tuyttens, F. A. M. 2009. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poult. Sci. 88:1536-1543.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cruickshank, G. 2004. Environment not stocking density-the key to broiler welfare. Poultry World 158:16-16.
18 Alvino, G. M., Archer, G. S. and Mench, J. A. 2009. Behavioural time budgets of broiler chickens reared in varying light intensities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 118:54-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Andrews, S., Omed, H. and Phillips, C. 1997. The effect of a single or repeated period of high stocking density on the behavior and response to stimuli in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 76:1655-1660.
20 Türkyilmaz, M. K. 2008. The Effect of Stocking Density on Stress Reaction in Broiler Chickens during Summer. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 32:31-36.
21 Mtileni, B. J., Nephawe, K. A., Nesamvuni, A. E. and Benyi, K. 2007. The Influence of Stocking Density on Body Weight, Egg Weight, and Feed Intake of Adult Broiler Breeder Hens. Poult. Sci. 86:1615-1619.
22 Shields, S. J., Garner, J. P. and Mench, J. A. 2004. Dustbathing by broiler chickens: a comparison of preference for four different substrates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87:69-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Shields, S., Garner, J. and Mench, J. 2005. Effect of sand and woodshavings bedding on the behavior of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 84:1816-1824.
24 Thaxton, J., Dozier, W., Branton, S., Morgan, G., Miles, D., Roush, W., Lott, B. and Vizzier-Thaxton, Y. 2006. Stocking density and physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Poult. Sci. 85:819-824.
25 Thomas, D. G., Ravindran, V., Thomas, D. V., Camden, B. J., Cottam, Y. H., Morel, P. C. and Cook, C. J. 2004. Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. N. Z. Vet. J. 52: 76-81.   DOI
26 Imaeda, N. 2000. Influence of the stocking density and rearing season on incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 79:201-204.