Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2011.53.3.185

Characterization of the Prolactin Receptor 3 (PRLR3) and Retinol-Binding Protein 4 (RBP4) Genes in the Birth Weight and Early Growth of Berkshire Pigs  

Do, Chang-Hee (Department of Animal Biosystem Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Dong-Hee (Department of Life Science, University of Seoul)
Cho, Byung-Wook (College of Natural Resource and Life Sciences, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.53, no.3, 2011 , pp. 185-193 More about this Journal
Abstract
To investigate the influences of candidate genes on the birth weight and the early stages of life, genotyping of the prolactin receptor 3 (PRLR3) and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) genes was performed in 156 and 141 Berkshire pigs, respectively. The frequency of both PRLR3 alleles A and a was 0.50. The frequencies of the RBP4 alleles B and b were 0.42 and 0.58, respectively. Neither locus was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. No significant associations of the PRLR3 alleles with birth or weaning weights and of the RBP4 alleles with birth weight were observed. The proportions of the phenotype variances due to the genotypes of PRLR3 in the feeder weights was 4.0% and those of RBP4 in the weaning and feeder weights were 11.9 and 3.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). The dominance effect of PRLR3 and RBP4 on feeder weights was 2.40 and -1.86 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). The additive and dominance effects of RBP4 on weaning weights were 0.332 and -0.682 kg, respectively (P < 0.01). Even if no significant epistasis of PRLR3 and RBP4 was detected, a considerable trend of consistent positive epistasis estimates of AA/BB and Aa/Bb was observed for all traits. The results of this study may have a considerable impact on early-stage growth by both loci, and a selection strategy should be designed separately for each marker in Berkshire pigs.
Keywords
Prolactin receptor; Retinol-binding protein; Candidate genes;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Soltan, M., Abdou, F. H., Abd-Ellatif, M. and Ayoub, H. 1977. Estimation of general and specific combining abilities from a diallel cross of three inbred lines of Fayoumi chicks. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 9(3):387-391.   DOI
2 Vincent, A. L., Evans, G., Short, T. H., Southwood, O. I., Plastow, G. S., Tuggle, C. K. and Rothschild, M. F. 1998. The prolactin receptor gene is associated with increased litter size in pigs. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Genetic Application of Livestock Production Armidale, NSW, Australia. 27, 15-18.
3 West, K. P., LeClerq, S. C., Shrestha, S. R., Wu, LS-F., Pradhan, E. K., Khatry, S. K., Katz, J., Adhikari, R. and Sommer, A. 1997. Effects of Vitamin A on Growth of Vitamin A-Deficient Children: Field Studies in Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 127, 1957-1965.   DOI
4 Jahn, G. A., Edery, M., Belair, L., Kelly, P. A. and Djiane, J. 1991. Prolactin receptor gene expression in rat mammary gland and liver during pregnancy and lactation. Endocrinology 128, 2976-2984.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Johnson, R. K., Nielsen, M. K. and Casey, D. S. 1999. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. Journal of Animal Science 77, 541-557.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Klemcke, H. G., Lunstra, D. D., Brwon-Borg, H. M., Borg, K. E. and Christensen, R. K. 1993. Association between low birth weight and adrenocortical function in neonatal pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1010-1018.   DOI
7 Klug, W. S., Cummings, M. R. and Spencer, C. A. 2007. Essential of genetics. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
8 Maes, M., Hertogh, R. D., Watrin-Granger, P. and Ketelslegers, J. M. 1983. Ontogeny of liver somatotropic and lactogenic binding sites in male and female rats. Endocrinology 113, 1325-1332.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Paik, J., Vogel, S., Quadro, L., Piantedosi, R., Gottesman, M., Lai, K., Hamberger, L., Vieira, M. and Blaner, W. S. 2004. Vitamin A: Overlapping delivery pathways to tissues from the circulation. Journal of Nutrition 134, 276S-280S.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Rothschild, M. F., Messer, L., Day, A., Wales, R., Short, T., Southwood, O. and Plastow, G. 2000. Investigation of the retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) gene as a candidate gene for increased litter size in pigs. Mammalian Genome 11, 75-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 De Passille, AMB, Rushen, J. E., Foxcroft, G. R., Aherne, F. X. and Schaeffer, A. 1993. Performance of young pigs: Relationships with periparturient progesterone, prolactin and insulin of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 71:179-184.   DOI
12 Rui, H., Djeu, J. Y., Evans, G. A., Kelly, P. A. and Farrar, W. L. 1992. Prolactin receptor triggering. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267, 24076-24081.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Rydhmer, L., Eliasson, L., Stern, S., Andersson, K. and Einarsson, S. 1989. Effects of piglet weight and fraternity size on performance, puberty and farrowing results. Acta Agric. Scand. 39, 397-406.   DOI
14 Danish, Veterinary and Food Administration. 2009. Effects of Danish restrictions on non-therapeutic use of antibiotics. In: Danish Veterinary and Food Administration FACT sheet (12.08.2009), p2.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Do, C. H. 2007. Estimation of growth traits using growth curve in Gyungnam-heugdon (Berkshire). Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Kor.) 49(2), 195-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Drogemuller, C., Hamann, H. and Distl, O. 2001. Candidate gene markers for litter size in different German pig lines. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 2565-2570.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edition), Pearson Prentice Hall, New York.
18 Fujii, J., Otsu, K., Zorzato, F., de Leon, S., Khanna, V. K., Weiler, J. E., O'Brien, P. J. and MacLennan, D. H. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science (Wash. DC) 253, 448-451.   DOI
19 Goffin, V., Binart, N., Touraine, P. and Kelly, P. A. 2002. Prolactin: the new biology of an old hormone. Annual Review of Physiology 64, 47-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Harney, J. P., Ott, T. L., Geisert, R. D. and Bazer, F. W. 1993. Retinol binding protein gene expression in cyclic and pregnant endometrium of pigs, sheep, and cattle. Biology of Reproduction 49. 1066-1073.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Isler, B. J., Ervin, K. M., Rothchild, M. F. and Evans, G. J. 2000. Association between the prolactine receptorgene and reproductive components in swine. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of Animal Genetics (Minneapolis, MN), p 67.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Berard, J., Kreuzer, M. and Bee, G. 2008. Effect of litter size and birth weight on growth, carcass and pork quality, and their relationship to postmortem proteolysis. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2357-2368.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Bole-Feysot, C., Goffin, V., Edery, M., Binart, N. and Kelly, P. A. 1998. Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocrine Review 19, 225-268.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Brief, S. and Chew, B. P. 1985. Effects of vitamin A and $\beta$-carotene on reproductive performance in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 60, 998-1004.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K. and Bhebhe, E. 2008. Genetic determination of mothering ability and piglet growth in indigeneous Mukota sows of Zimbabwe. Livest. Sci. 113, 74-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Buck, K., Vanek, M., Groner, B. and Ball, R. K. 1992. Multiple forms of prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid are specifically expressed and regulated in murine tissues and the mammary cell line HC11. Endocrinology 130, 1108-1114.   DOI   ScienceOn