Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2003.45.6.1067

Effects of Gestation Housing and Parity on the Farrowing Performance and Behaviour of Sows during the Pregnancy, Farrowing and Lactation  

Kim, D.H. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Graduate School, RAIRC, Jinju National University)
Park , J.Y. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Graduate School, RAIRC, Jinju National University)
Woo, J.H. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Graduate School, RAIRC, Jinju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Science and Technology / v.45, no.6, 2003 , pp. 1067-1078 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was designed to determine the effect of gestation housing and parity on the farrowing performance and behaviour of sows during pregnancy, farrowing and lactation periods. Total 18 Duroc sows were randomly assigned after 4 weeks of gestation to either an individual gestation stall or a groups of three with pen gestation system for three parities(1st, 2nd${\sim}$3rd, and 4th${\sim}$5th). Approximately 7 days before predicted farrowing date, sows were transferred to farrowing crates where they remained until 21 days post-partum. Behaviour was recorded on day 60 and 90 of pregnancy for 24 hours, on day of farrowing for farrowing duration and on day 10 of lactation for 2.5 hours in the farrowing crate. The results obtained from this study were summarized as follows: On 60 and 90 day of pregnancy, all sows in both groups made attempts for ventral lying more than for other postures. Sows in the group gestation pen spent more time on walking than those in individual gestation stall(p<0.01); however, the group housed sows were spent less time on drinking than the individually housed sows(p<0.01). There was no significant difference between gestation housings in the occurrence of stereotypy of pregnant sows. On day 60 of pregnancy, sows in the individual gestation stall showed the highest frequency of vacuum chewing and head weaving. However, floor licking and bar licking behaviours were highest in day 90 pregnant sows individually housed. The sows individually housed during the gestation period spent more time on sitting and eating on the day of farrowing in the farrowing crate than the sows group housed. On day 10 of lactation in the farrowing crate, the group housed sows during the gestation period made significantly more attempts for ventral lying than sows individually housed. In conclusion, the occurrence of stereotypy of sows during the gestation and lactation did not differ between gestation housings and farrowing performance of sows during the gestation period was not affected by gestation housing. Thus, the group housing for pregnant sows is a feasible means to improve welfare of sows and to increase the normal behaviour of sows.
Keywords
Gestation housing; Parity; Sows; Welfare; Behaviour; Farrowing performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anil, L., Anil, S. S. and Deen, J. 2002. Relationship between postural behaviour and gestation stall dimensions in relation to sow size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 77:173-181.
2 Appleyard, S. J. and Lawrence A. B. 2001. The farrowing crate limits the effectiveness of functional sows maternal behaviour. In: Garner, J. P., Mench, J. A., Heekin, S. P.(Eds.), Proceedings of the International Society for Applied Ethology. University of California, Davis, p. 195
3 Boyle, L. A., Leonard, F. C., Lynch, P. B. and Brophy, P. 2002. Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:119-134.
4 Boyle, L. A., Leonard, F. C., Lynch, P. B. and Brophy, P. 2000. Influence of housing system during gestation on the behaviour and welfare of gilts in farrowing crates. Anim. Sci. 71:561-570.
5 Caroline, V. T., Pape, G. Le. and Signoret, J. P. 1995. Stereotypies in pregnant sows: indications of influence of the housing system on the patterns expressed by the animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:19-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cronin, G. M., Barnett, J. L., Hodge, F. M., Smith, J. A. and McCallum, T. H. 1991. The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments; cortisol responses of sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 32:117-127.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Cronin, G. M., Simpson, G. J. and Hemsworth, P. H. 1996. The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 46:175-192.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 DePassille, A.M.B. and Robert, S. 1989. Behaviour of lactating sows: influence of stage of lactation and husbandry practices at weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23:315-329.
9 Fraser, D. 1975. The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Anim. Prod. 21:59-68.
10 Ferket, S. L. and Hacker, R. R. 1985. Effect of forced exercise during gestation on reproductive performance of sows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 65:851-859.   DOI
11 Jarvis, S., van der Vegt, B. J., Lawrence, A. B., McLean, K. A., Calvert, S. K., Deans, L. A. and Chirnside, J. 1998. The effect of parity on the behavioural and physiological responses of parturient pigs to the farrowing environment. In: Veissier, I. and Boissy, A.(Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethlogy. Clermont-Ferrand, France, 129.
12 Jensen, P. 1988. Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 20:297-308.
13 Jensen, P. and Redbo, I. 1987. Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18:355-362.
14 Lawrence, A. B., Petherick, J. C., McLean, K. A., Deans, L. A., Chirnside, J., Vaughan, A., Clutton, E. and Terlouw, E.M.C. 1994. The effect of environment on behaviour, plasma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows, Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. 39:313-330.
15 Lynch, P. B., O'Grady, J. F. and Kearney, P. A. 1984. Effect of housing systen on sow productivity. Ann, Rech. Vet. 15:181-184.
16 Marchant, J. N. and Broom, D. M. 1996. Factors affecting posture changing in loose-housed and confined gestating sows. Anim. Sci. 63:477-485.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Barnett, J. L., Winfield, C. G., Cronin, G. M., Hemsworth, P. H. and Dewar, A. M. 1985. The effect of individual and group housing on behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 14:149-161.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Marchant, J. N., Broom, D. M. and Corning, S. 2001. The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Anim. Sci. 72:19-28.
19 Noldus Information Technology. 1993. The observer, Base Package for DOS. Reference manual, Ver. 3.0. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
20 Noldus Information Technology. 1994. The observer, Support Package for Psion Organisere. User's manual, Ver. 3.0. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
21 Beattie, V. E., Walker, N. and Sneddon, I. A. 1995. Effect of rearing environment and change of environment on the behaviour of gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 46:57-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Taylor, L., Friend, T. and Smith, L. A. 1988. Effects of housing on in situ postures of gestating gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 19:265-272.
23 Terlouw, C. E. M., Lawrenec, A. B. and Illius, A. W. 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sow. Anim. Behav. 42:981-991.   DOI
24 Thodberg, K., Jensen, K. H., Herskin, M. S. and Jorgensen, E. 1999. Influence of environmental stimuli on nest building and farrowing behaviour in domestic sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63:131-144.
25 Schouten, W. and Rushen, J. 1992. Effects of naloxone on stereotypic and normal behaviour of tethered and loose-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33:17-26.
26 Gotz, M. 1991. Changes in nursing and suckling behaviour of sows and their piglets in farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31:271-275.
27 Harris, M. J. and Gonyou, H. W. 1998. Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59:285-296.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Hemsworth, P. H. 1982. Social environment and reproduction. In: Cole, D.J.A. and Foxcroft, G. R.(Eds.), Control of pig production. Butterworth, London, pp 585-601.
29 Rushen, J. P. 1985. Stereotypies, aggression and the feeding schedules of tethered sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14:137-147.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 SAS. 1998. User's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
31 Stolba, A., Baker, N. and Wood-Guch, D. G. M. 1983. The characterization of stereotyped behaviour in stalled sows by information redundancy. Behaviour. 87:157-182.