Effect of Different Inoculation Concentration of Escherichia coli on Boar Sperm Quality and Reproductive Performance in Sow |
Sa, Soo Jin
(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Choi, Sun Ho (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Kim, Hyun Jong (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Cho, Kyu Ho (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Hong, Joon Ki (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Kim, Du Wan (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Kim, Young Hwa (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Park, Jun Cheol (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Chung, Ki Hwa (Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) |
1 | Althouse GC, Kuster CE, Clarck SG, Weisiger RM (2000): Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 53:1167-1176. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Althouse GC, Lu KG (2005): Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63:573-584. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Arredondo C, Fernandez A, Lazo L, Cruz E, Machado J (2001): Bacteriological studies of swine semen. Preliminar evaluation of the effect of Escherichia coli lectins on spermagglutination. Rev Cub Sal Animal 23:73-79. |
4 | Dagnall GJR (1986): An investigation of the bacterial flora of the preputial diverticulum and of the semen of boars. M.Ph. Thesis. Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire. |
5 | Kaur M, Tripathi KK, Bansal MR, Jain PK, Cupta KG (1986): Bacteriology of cervix in cases of infertility: effect on human sperm. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 12:21-24. DOI |
6 | Kuster CE, Althouse GC (1997): Sperm agglutination of extended semen caused by gentamicin resistant bacteria. In: Proceedings of the 28th American Association of Swine Practitioners Meeting, pp 293-295. |
7 | Maes D, Nauwynck H, Rijsselaere T, Mateusen B, Vyt P, de Kruif A, Van Soom A (2008): Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: an overview. Theriogenology 70:1337-1345. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Maroto Martin LO, Munoz EC, Cupere FD, Driessche EV, Echemendia-Blanco D, Machado Rodriguez JM, Beeckmans S (2010): Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Ani Reprod Sci 120:95-104. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Mirjyn A. (1999): Stimulation and Detection of Heat in Gilts and Sows. Tech Report 12, NCSU. |
10 | OIE (2001): Semen de vovinos. Codigo Zoosanitario Internacional. Parte 3. Titulo 3.2. Anexo 3.2.1. Disponible de: http://www.oie.int. |
11 | Sepulveda L, Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Torner E, Bonet S (2013): How do different concentrations of Clostridium perfringens affect the quality of extended boar spermatozoa? Anim Reprod Sci 140:83-91. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | So KM, Sa SJ, Kim HJ, Chung KH, Jung BY, Son JH, Kim IC (2011): Effects of Escherichia coli contamination on extend porcine semen parameters. Reprod Dev Biol 35(4):479-483. |
13 | Sone M, Kawarasaki T, Ogasa A, Nahara T (1989): Effects of bacteria-contaminated boar semen on reproductive performance. Jpn J Anim Reprod 35(3):159-164. DOI |
14 | Waberski D, Weyand A, Seedorf J, Weitze KF (2010): Hygiene measures in boar semen production. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 38 (Suppl. 1):1-7. |
![]() |