1 |
Kozdrowski R, Staroniewiez Z, Dubiel A (2005): Bacterial flora of semen of wild boar and their hybrids with domestic pig. Elect J Polish Agric Universities 8(2) #8.
|
2 |
Kuster CE, Althouse GC (1997): Sperm agglutination of extended semen caused by gentamicin resistant bacteria. In: Proceedings of the 28th American Association of Swine Practitioners Meeting, pp293-295.
|
3 |
Lee, HT (2007): Effects of storage time on bacteria concentration and sperm parameters in boar semen. Jinju National Industrial College, Master's Thesis, p20.
|
4 |
Maroto Martí LO, Munoz EC, Cupere FD, Driessche EV, Echemendia-Blanco D, Machado Rodríuez JM, Beeckmans S (2010): Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Ani Reprod Sci 120:95-104.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
OIE (2001): Terrestrial animal health code. Chapter 4.6. Collection and processing of porcine semen. http:// www.oie.int/
|
6 |
SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 9.3. (2000): SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
|
7 |
Sone M, Kawarasaki T, Ogasa A, Nahara T (1989): Effects of bacteria- contaminated boar semen on the reproductive performance. Jpn J Anim Reprod 35 (3): 159-164.
DOI
|
8 |
Storey BT (1997): Biochemistry of the induction and prevention of lipoperoxidative damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 3:203-213.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Tamuli MK, Sharma DK, Rajkonwar CK (1984): Studies on the microbial flora of boar semen. Indian Vet J 61:858-861.
|
10 |
Zeng WX, Terada T (2001): Protection of boar spermatozoa from cold shock damage by 2-hydroxypropyl- beta-cyclodextrin. Theriogenology 55:615-627.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Althouse GC, Kuster CE, Clark SG, Weisiger RM (2000): Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 53:1167-1176.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Auroux MR, Jacques L, Mathieu D, Auer J (1991): Is the sperm bacterial ratio a determining factor in impairment of sperm motility: an in vitro study in man with Escherichia coli. Int J Androl 14:264-270.
DOI
|
13 |
Althouse GC, Lu KG (2005): Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63:573-58
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Althouse GC (2008): Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Domest Anim 43(Suppl. 2):374-378.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Arredondo C, Fernandez A, Lazo L, Cruz E, Machado J (2001): Bacteriological studies of swine semen. Preliminar evaluation of the effect of Escherichia coli lectins on spermagglutination. Rev Cub Sal Animal 23:73-79.
|
16 |
Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, Bonet S (2011): Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Ani Reprod Sci 127:176-182.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Dagnall GJR (1986): An investigation of the bacterial flora of the preputial diverticulum and of the semen of boars. M.Ph. Thesis. Royal Veterinary Co llege, Hertfordshire.
|
18 |
Diemer T, Huwe P, Ludwig M, Schroeder-Printzen I, Michelmann HW, Schiefer HG, Weidner W (2003): Influence of autogenous leucocytes and Escherichia coli on sperm motility parameters in vitro. Andrologia 35:100-105.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Flowers WL (1996): Common issues associated with on-farm A.I. use. Proc. Allen D. Leman Swine Conference. University of Minnesota, US, pp 69-73.
|
20 |
Jung JA, Park MH, Park BS, Kim HY, Byun JW, Jeon AB, Chung KH, So KM, Jung BY (2011): Prevelence of bacteria contaminated in boar semen. Korean J Vet Sci(suppl). 51(3):60.
|
21 |
Kaur M, Tripathi KK, Bansal MR, Jain PK, Gupta KG (1986): Bacteriology of cervix in cases of infertility: Effect on human sperm. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 12:21-24.
DOI
|
22 |
Kim IC, Sa SJ, Kang K, Kim SH, Bae SJ, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Min CS, Son JH, Chung KH (2011): Current status of swine artificial insemination(AI) in Korea. Reprod Dev Biol 35(3):227-232.
|