Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12749/RDB.2013.37.3.117

Effects of the Dietary Supplementation of Pelletted-Italian Ryegrass on Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows  

Kim, Ki Hyun (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Kwang Sik (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Jo Eun (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Jung, Hyun Jung (Technology Cooperation Bureau, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Sung Dae (Research Policy Bureau, Rural Development Administration)
Sa, Soo Jin (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Hong, Joon Ki (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Park, Jun Cheol (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Young Hwa (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of pelleted-Italian Ryegrass (IRG) as a source of fiber on reproduction performance in pregnant sows. A total of 24 pregnant sows were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments, which was given a corn-soybean diet with 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% pelleted-IRG from 105 days prepartum to 7 days postpartum. During experimental period, the sows fed the IRG supplemented diet showed the lower feed intake than the sows fed the control diet (p<0.05). The changes of body weight in sows from initial to pre- and/or post-partum was significantly smaller in sows fed the IRG supplemented diet than control group. It is thought that the lower weight gain in IRG supplemented groups is caused by low feed intake. Although there was no significant difference, sows fed the IRG supplemented diet tended to increase the litter size and birth weight in piglets compared with sows fed the control diet. This result suggests that the dietary supplementation of IRG has the positive effects to improve the reproductive performance in sows. But, the excessive feeding of IRG to sows might cause to retard the days of return to estrus, and decrease the contents of solid, milk protein, and milk fat in colostrum. Thus, the addition of about 10% IRG is desirable to increase the reproductive performance. Meanwhile, the feeding energy diet is better effective than feeding the fiber diets to improve overall productivity in sows after postpartum.
Keywords
Italian ryegrass; Fiber diet; Reproductive; Litter size; Swine;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baird DM, McCampbell HC, Allison JR (1975): Effects of levels of crude fiber, protein and bulk in diet for finishing hogs. J Anim Sci 41:1039-1047.   DOI
2 Christian RE, Nofziger JC (1952): Puberty and other reproductive phenomena in gilts as affected by plane of nutrition. J Anim Sci 11:789. (Abstr.).
3 Cromwell GL, Hall DD, Combs GE, Hale OM, Handlin DL, Hitchcock JP, Knabe DA, Kornegay ET, Lindemann MD, Maxwell CV, Prince TJ (1989): Effects of dietary salt level during gestation and lactation on reproductive performance of sows: A co- operative study. J Anim Sci 67:374-385.   DOI
4 Darroch CS, Dove CR, Maxwell CV, Johnson ZB, Southern LL (2008): A regional evaluation of the effect of fiber type in gestation diets on sow reproductive performance. J Anim Sci 86:1573-1578.   DOI
5 Davidson MH, McDonald A (1998): Fiber: Forms and function. Nutr Res 18:617-626.   DOI
6 Dean BT, Tribble LF (1959): The effect of level of feeding during gestation on sow performance. Mo Ann Swine Day Rpt 3:12.
7 Ewan RC, Crenshaw JD, Crenshaw TD, Cromwell GL, Easter RA, Nelssen JL, Miller ER, Pettigrew JE, Veum TL (1996): Effect of addition of fiber to gestation diets on reproductive performance of sows. J Anim Sci 74(Suppl.1):190. (Abstr.).   DOI
8 Frobish LT, Speer VC, Hays VW (1966): Effect of protein and energy intake on reproductive performance in swine. J Anim Sci 25:729-733.   DOI
9 Gossett JW, Sorensen AM (1959): The effects of two levels of energy and seasons on reproductive phenomena of gilts. J Anim Sci 18:40-47.   DOI
10 Grieshop M, Reese DE, Fahey GC (2001): Nonstarch polysaccharides and oligosaccharides in swine nutrition. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL (eds). Swine Nutrition. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. pp 107-130.
11 Hafez ESE (1958): Reproduction, placentation and prenatal development in swine as affected by nutritional environment. J Anim Sci 17:1212. (Abstr.).
12 Holt JP, Johnston LJ, Baidoo SK, Shurson GC (2006): Effects of a high-fiber diet and frequency of feeding on behavior, reproductive performance, and nutrient digestibility in gestating sows. J Anim Sci 84: 946-955.   DOI
13 King RH (1989): Effects of live weight and body composition of gilt at 24 week of age on subsequent reproductive efficiency. Anim Prod 49:109-115.   DOI
14 Pickett RA, Beeson WM (1962): Effect of energy intake, haylage and free-choice supplement on the reproductive performance of gilts. Purdue Univ. Res Prog Rpt. pp 36.
15 Larsen LM, Oldfield JE (1961): Improvement of barley rations for swine. III. Effects of fiber from barley hulls and purified cellulose in barley and corn rations. J Anim Sci 29:11-15.
16 McGillivray JJ, Nalbandov AV, Jensen AH, Norton HW, Becker DE (1962): Reproductive performance in gilts starved or fed different levels of energy. J Anim Sci. 21:1005. (Abstr.).
17 Mroz Z, Partridge G, Mitchell G, Keal HD (1986): The effects of oat hulls added to the basal ration for pregnant sows on reproductive performance, apparent digestibility, rate of passage and plasma parameters. J Sci Food Agric 37:239-247.   DOI
18 Pollmann DS, Danielson DM, Crenshaw MA, Peo ER Jr (1980): Long-term effects of dietary additions of alfalfa and tallow on sow reproductive performance. J Anim Sci 51:294-299.   DOI
19 Pond WG, Yen JT, Varel VH (1985): Effects of level and source of dietary fiber in gestation on repro ductive performance and nutrient digestibility in gilts. Nutr Rep Int 32:505-514.
20 Reese DE (1997): Dietary fiber in sow gestation diets-A review. Nebra Swi Rpt. pp 229.
21 Renaudeau D, Anais C, Noblet J (2003): Effects of dietary fiber on performance of multiparouslactating sow in a tropical climate. J Anim Sci 81:717- 725.   DOI
22 Robertson GT, Casida LE, Grummer RH, Chapman AB (1951): Some feeding and management factors affecting age at puberty and related phenomena in Chester White and Poland China gilts. J Anim Sci 10:841-866.   DOI
23 Sakata T, Inagaki A (2001): Organic acid production in the large intestine: Implication for epithelial cell proliferation and cell death. In: Piva A, Bach Kundsen KE, Linberg JE (eds) Gut Environment of Pig. 1st ed. Nothingam Univ Press, Nothingum, UK. pp 85.
24 Schoenherr WD, Stahly TS, Cromwell GL (1989): The effects of dietary fat or fiber addition on yield and composition of milk from sows housed in a warm or hot environment. J Anim Sci 67:482-495.   DOI
25 Zoiopoulos PE, English PR, Topps JH (1983): A note on intake and digestibility of fibrous diet self fed to primiparous sows. Anim Prod 37:153-156. (Received: 6 September 2013/ Accepted: 11 September 2013)   DOI
26 Self HL, Grummer RH, Hays OE, Spies HG (1960): Influence of three different feeding levels during growth and gestation on reproduction, weight gains and carcass quality in swine. J Anim Sci 19:274-282.   DOI
27 Veum TL, Crenshaw JD, Crenshaw TD, Cromwell GL, Easter RA, Ewan RC, Nelssen JL, Miller ER, Pettigrew JE, Ellersieck MR (2009): The addition of ground wheat straw as a fiber source in the gestation diet of sows and the effect on sow and litter performance for three successive parities. J Anim Sci 87:1003-1012.
28 Zoiopoulos PE, English PR, Topps JH (1982): High-fibre diets for ad libitum feeding of sows during lactation. Anim Prod 35:25-33.   DOI