Effects of Escherichia coli Contamination on Extended Porcine Semen Parameters |
So, Kyoung-Min
(National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Sa, Soo-Jin (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Kim, Hyo-Jin (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Chung, Ki-Hwa (Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) Jung, Byeong-Yeal (Animal Disease Diagnostic Division, Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine & Inspection Agency) Son, Jung-Ho (Noah Biotech. Inc.) Kim, In-Cheul (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) |
1 | Althouse GC (2008): Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod Domest Anim 43(Suppl. 2):374-378. DOI |
2 | Althouse GC, Lu KG (2005): Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63:573-584. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Althouse GC, Kuster CE, Clark SG, Weisiger RM (2000): Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 53:1167-1176. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Alvarez JG, Storey BT (1983): Role of superoxide dismutase in protecting rabbit spermatozoa from O2 toxicity due to lipid peroxidation. Biol Reprod 28: 1129-1136. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Arredondo C, Fernandez A, Lazo L, Cruz E, Machado J (2001): Bacteriological studies of swine semen. Preliminar evaluation of the effect of Escherichia coli lectins on spermagglutination. Rev Cub Sal Animal 23:73-79. |
6 | Auroux MR, Jacques L, Mathieu D, Auer J (1991): Is the sperm bacterial ratio a determining factor in impairment of sperm motility: an in vitro study in man with Escherichia coli. Int J Androl 14:264-270. DOI |
7 | Monga M, Roberts JA (1994): Spermagglutination by bacteria: receptor-specific interactions. J Androl 15:151-156. |
8 | Storey BT (1997): Biochemistry of the induction and prevention of lipoperoxidative damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 3:203-213. DOI |
9 | OIE, 2001. Semen de bovinos. Codigo Zoosanitario Internacional. Parte 3. Titulo 3.2. Anexo 3.2.1. Disponible de: http://www.oie.int. |
10 | Sone M, Kawarasaki T, Ogasa A, Nahara T (1989): Effects of bacteria- contaminated boar semen on the reproductive performance. Jpn J Anim Reprod 35 (3): 159-164. DOI |
11 | Tamuli MK, Sharma DK, Rajkonwar CK (1984): Studies on the microbial flora of boar semen. Indian Vet J 61:858-861. |
12 | In Cheul Kim, Soo Jin Sa, Kwon Kang, Sang Hyun Kim, Sang Jong Bae, Dae Sil Kim, Si Joo Kim, Chan Sik Min, Jung Ho Son and Ki Hwa Chung (2011): Current Status of Swine Artificial Insemination(AI) in Korea. Reprod Dev Biol 35(3):227-232 |
13 | Flowers WL (1996): Common issues associated with on-farm A.I. use. Proc. Allen D. Leman Swine Conference. University of Minnesota, US, pp 69-73. |
14 | Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Sepúlveda L, Torner E, Pinart E, Bonet S (2011): Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Ani Reprod Sci 127:176-182. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Dagnall GJR (1986): An investigation of the bacterial flora of the preputial diverticulum and of the semen of boars. M.Ph. Thesis. Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire. |
16 | Diemer T, Huwe P, Ludwig M, Schroeder-Printzen I, Michelmann HW, Schiefer HG, Weidner W (2003): Influence of autogenous leucocytes and Escherichia coli on sperm motility parameters in vitro. Andrologia 35:100-105. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Kaur M, Tripathi KK, Bansal MR, Jain PK, Gupta KG (1986): Bacteriology of cervix in cases of infertility: Effect on human sperm. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 12:21-24. DOI |
18 | Kozdrowski R, Staroniewiez Z, Dubiel A (2005): Bacterial flora of semen of wild boar and their hybrids with domestic pig. Elect J Polish Agric Universities 8(2) #8. |
19 | Kuster CE, Althouse GC (1997): Sperm agglutination of extended semen caused by gentamicin resistant bacteria. In: Proceedings of the 28th American Association of Swine Practitioners Meeting, pp 293-295. |
20 | Maroto Martín LO, Munoz EC, Cupere FD, Driessche EV, Echemendia-Blanco D, Machado Rodríguez JM, Beeckmans S (2010): Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Ani Reprod Sci 120:95-104. DOI ScienceOn |