Correlations between Sperm Motility, SCSA (Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay), Reproductive Performance and Heterospermic Fertility in Boars |
Kim, In-Cheul
(National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Ryu, Jae-Weon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Cho, Kyu-Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Hong, Joon-Ki (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Choi, Eun-Ji (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Choi, Bong-Hwan (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Park, Jun-Cheol (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Moon, Hong-Kil (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) Son, Jung-Ho (Noah Biotech Inc.) |
1 | Bochenek M, Smorg Z, Pilch J (2001): Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 56:557-567 DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Collins ED, Flowers WL, Shanks RD, Miller DJ (2008): Porcine sperm zona binding ability as an indicator of fertility. Animal Reproduction Science 104:69-82 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K (1999): Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 14:1039-1049 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Hammitt DG, Martin PA, Callanan T (1989): Correlations between heterospermic fertility and assays of porcine seminal quality before and after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 32:385-399 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP (2000): Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques. Human Rep 15:1717-1722 DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Petit JM, Ratinaud MH, Cordelli E, Spano M, Julien R (1995): Flow cytometry and sorting of mouse testis cells : DNA and mitochondrial changes during spermatogenesis. Cytometry 19:304-312 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Schmid TE, Kamischke A, Bollwein H, Nieschlag E, Brinkworth MH (2003): Genetic damage in oligozoospermic patients detected by fluorescence insitu hybridization, inverse restriction site mutation assay, sperm chromatin structure assay and the Comet assay. Hum Reprod 18:1474-1480 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Stahlberg R, Harhzius B, Weitze KF, Waberskila D (2000): Identification of embryo paternity using polymorphic dna markers to assess fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa after heterospermic insemination in boars. Theriogenology 53:1365-1373 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Trish Berger, Martin Dally (2001): Do sire-dam interactions contribute significantly to fertility comparisons in heterospermic insemination trials Theriogenology 56:535-543 DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Waberski D, Magnus F, Mendonca Ferreira F, Petrunkina AM, Weitze KF, Topfer-Petersen E (2005): Importance of sperm-binding assays for fertility prognosis of porcine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 63: 470-484 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Woelders H (1991): Overview of in vitro methods for evaluation of semen quality. Theriogenology 63: 470-484 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Ward WS, Coffey DS (1990): Specific organization of genes in relation to the sperm nuclear matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:20-25 DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Gadea J, Matas C (2000): Sperm factors related to in vitro penetration of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 54:1343-1357 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Perez-Llano B, Lorenzo JL, Yenes P, Trejo A, Garcia- Casado P (2001): A short hypoosmotic swelling test for the prediction of boar sperm fertility. Theriogenology 56:387-398 DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Carver-Ward JA, Moran-Verbeek IM, Hollanders JM (1997): Comparative flow cytometric analysis of the human sperm acrosome reaction using CD46 antibody and lectins. J Assist Reprod Genet 14: 111-119 DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Garner DL, Johnson LA (1995): Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod 53:276-284 DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Love CC, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL, Thompson JA, Blanchard TL, Varner DD (2005): Relationship of seminal plasma level and extender type to sperm motility and DNA integrity. Theriogenology 63: 1584-1591 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Boissenault G (2002): Chromatin remodelling during spermiogenesis; A possible role for the transition proteins in DNA strand break repair. FEBS Lett 514:111-114 DOI |
19 | Evenson D, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz (1990): Acridine orange induced precipitation of mouse testicular sperm cell DNA reveals new patterns of chromatin structure. Exp Cell Res 187:328-334 DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Thomas CA, Garner DL, DeJ-arnette JM, Marshall CE (1998): Effect of cryopreservation on bovine sperm organelle function and viability as determined by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 58:786-793 DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Evenson DP, Jost LK, Baer RK, Turner TW, Schrader SM (1991): Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Toxicol 5: 115-125 DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Zeng WX, Terada T (2001): Protection of boar spermatozoa from cold shock damage by 2-hydroxypropyl- beta-cyclodextrin. Theriogenology 55:615-627 DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Nagy S, Jansen J, Topper EK, Gadella BM (2003): A triple stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma and acrosome membrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg yolk particles. Biol Reprod 68: 1828-1835 DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Clark LK, Schinckel AP, Singleton WL, Einstein ME, Teclaw RF (1989): Use of farrowing rate as a measure of fertility of boars. J Am Vet Med Assoc 194: 239-243 |
25 | Karabinus DS, Evenson DP, Kaproth MT (1991): Effects of egg yolk-citrate and milk extenders on chromatin structure and viability of cyopreserved bull sperm. J Dairy Sci 74:3836-3848 DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Matas C, Gadea J, Alonso MI, Roca J (1996): Oocyte penetration by fresh or stored diluted boar spermatozoa before and after in vitro capacitation treatments. Biol Reprod 55:134-140 DOI ScienceOn |
27 | Bielecki R, Zini A, Phang D, Zenzes MT (2001): Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 75: 674-677 DOI ScienceOn |
28 | Evenson DP, Darzynkiewitz Z, Melamed MR (1982): Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem 30:279-280 DOI ScienceOn |
29 | Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WM (2005): Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 63:445-457 DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR (2002): Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normospermic infertile men : A prospective study. Fertil Steril 78: 313-318 DOI ScienceOn |
31 | Love CC, Thompson JA, Lowry VK, Varner DD (2002): Effect of storage time and temperature on stallion sperm DNA and fertility. Theriogenology 57:1135-1142 DOI ScienceOn |
32 | D'Cruz OJ, Haas GG (1996): Fluorescence-labeled fucolectins are superior markers for flow cytometric quantization of the human sperm acrosome reaction. Fertil Steril 65:843-851 DOI |
33 | Galli A, Bosisio M (1988): Quality of semen stored at +15/16 is related to fertility of artificially inseminated swine. Theriogenology 30:1185-1190 DOI ScienceOn |
34 | Evenson D, Jost L (2000): Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci 22:169-189 DOI ScienceOn |
35 | Marchetti C, Obert G, Deffosez A, Marchetti P (2002): Study of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm. Hum Reprod 17:1257-1265 DOI ScienceOn |
36 | Evenson D, Lorna Jost (2002): Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Fertil Steril 78:S191 |
37 | Gadea J, Matas C, Lucas X (1998): Prediction of porcine semen fertility by homologous in vitro penetration (hIVP) assay. Anim Reprod Sci 54:95-108 DOI ScienceOn |
38 | Hammerstedt RH (1996): Evaluation of sperm quality: Identification of the subfertile male and courses of action. Anim Reprod Sci 42:77-87 DOI |
39 | Boilard M, Bailey J, Collin S, Dufour M, Sirard MA (2002): Effect of bovine oviduct epithelial cell apical plasma membranes on sperm function assessed by a novel flow cytometric approach. Biol Reprod 67:1125-1132 DOI ScienceOn |