Browse > Article

Analysis of Membrane Integrity, DNA Fragmentation and Mitochondrial Function in Pig Spermatozoa Sorted by Flowcytometer  

Kim, In-Cheul (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Han, Deug-Woo (Noah Biotech Inc.)
Lee, Sung-Won (Noah Biotech Inc.)
Ryu, Jae-Weon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Choi, Eun-Ji (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Son, Jung-Ho (Noah Biotech Inc.)
Publication Information
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the potential hazardous effects of sorting process by flowcytometry on the quality of boar spermatozoa by flowcytometer. Freshly collected boar semen was diluted and divided into two groups; control none sorted and sorted. Sperms in sorted group were processed with flowcytometer for cell sorting with $100\;{\mu}M$ nozzle under the 20 psi pressure. Measurements on each parameter were made at two time points, 0hr (right after sorting) and 24 hr post sorting. Although there was a tendency of lower viability in sorted group than none sorted control group, the percentage of live cells in control ($75.83{\pm}6.92\;&\;59.53{\pm}10.34$) was not significantly different from sorted ($59.70{\pm}7.37\;&\;43.97{\pm}3.76$) at both 0 and 24 hr post sorting. However, sorted sperm showed significantly lower mitochondrial function compared to the control at both 0 h ($79.37{\pm}3.22\;vs.\;63.50{\pm}10.05$) and 24 hr ($67.27{\pm}3.22$ vs. $46.97{\pm}5.37$) time points (p<0.007). Sperm DNA fragmentation rate was significantly lower in control ($22.0{\pm}7.04$) than that of sorted ($32.27{\pm}7.49$) at 24 hr time point (p<0.0002). Taken together, these data suggested thatsorting process by flowcytometer may have influenced sperm motility rather than viability. Also high speed sperm sorting by flowcytometer has significant effects on DNA fragmentation on elapsed time after sorting.
Keywords
Flowcytometry; Sperm sorting; Sperm parameters;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Spinaci M, De Ambrogi M, Volpe S, Galeati G, Tamanini C, Seren E (2005): Effect of staining and sorting on boar sperm membrane integrity, mitochondrial activity and in vitro blastocyst development. Theriogenology 64:191-201   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Garner, DL, Seidel GE Jr. (2008): History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology 69:886-895   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Garner DL, Johnson LA (1995): Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using sybr-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod 53:276-284   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Shapiro HM (2003): Practical flow cytometry. 4th ed. By John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey
5 Son JH (2008): Sperm sex-sorting: past, present, and future. J Emb Trans. In press
6 D'Occhio MJ, Hengstberger KJ, Johnston SD (2007): Biology of sperm chromatin structure and relationship to male fertility and embryonic survival. Anim Reprod Sci. 101(1-2):1-17   DOI
7 De Ambrogi M, Spinaci M, Galeati G, Tamanini C (2006): Viability and DNA fragmentation in differently sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 66: 1994-2000   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Suh TK, Schenk JL, Seidel GE Jr (2005): A High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology 64:1035-1048   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Boe-Hansen GB, Morris ID, Ersboll AK, Greve T, Christensen P (2005): DNA integrity in sexed bull sperm assessed by neutral Comet assay and sperm chromatin structure assay. Theriogenology 63:1789-1802   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Liu QH, Li J, Zhang SC, Xiao ZZ, Ding FH, Yu DD, Xu XZ (2007): Flow cytometry and ultrastructure of cryopreserved red seabream (Pagrus major) sperm. Theriogenology 67:1168-1174   DOI   ScienceOn