Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.9.335

A Comparative Study on Various Student-Centered Curriculum's Teaching Experiences Focusing on Physical Education  

Cho, Ki-Bum (Division of Sport Science, College of Sport & Art, Hanyang University)
Moon, Jong-Ho (Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina)
Lee, Hee-Su (Department of Physical Education, Gyeongin National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.9, 2021 , pp. 335-342 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to suggest qualitative improvement through various student-centered curriculum's teaching experiences focusing on physical education. For this, class diaries, memos, lesson plans, student reviews, and videos for the past four years (2017-2020) were collected and analyzed from four high schools in kyonggi-do, and six students were interviewed. The common features between each student-centered curriculum were to have many students with the purpose of entrance examination and with concern about time conflicts between class and their dinner. In contrast, the differences between each student-centered curriculum were the required level of writing lesson plan, the level of interest and role of a class supervisor, and educational expected effect of students under a given condition. In summary, pre-education experience should be required and class activity support and various evaluation methods should be also needed.
Keywords
education on demand; university of dreams; curriculum cluster; student-centered curriculum; students;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. W. Lee, K. S. Baek & S. J. Lee. (2017). Key Competencies in the 2015 Revised Curriculum: The Relationship with the Idea of the Educated Person, Educational Goals, and Subject Competencies. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 67-94.
2 J. J. Ju, W. J. Kim, H. M. Lee, D. B. Lee & S. J. Park. (2017). The Direction for All Grades Credit-Based Elective Curriculum in High School. Suwon: Gyeonggi Institute of Education.
3 Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2016). 2016 Curriculum Cluster Implementation Manual. Suwon: Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.
4 N. S. Park. (2016). Is a Tailored High School Curriculum Possible or Not?: A Case Study of a Curriculum Cluster. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 49-69.
5 T. H. Choi. (2018). Policy Implications for the University of Gyeonggi Dreams in terms of Innovative Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Hummanities, and Sociology, 8(8), 567-575. DOI: 10.21742/AJMAHS.2018.08.57
6 K. B. Cho. (2018). The Exploration of High School Students' Experiences through the Physical Education Curriculum Cluster as Student-Centered Curriculum. Educational Research, 73, 151-167. DOI: 10.17253/swueri.2018.73.008   DOI
7 Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2019 a). School Curriculum and Press Release. Ministry of Education (Online). https://hischool.go.kr/info/officenes/view.do?nttid=16389#
8 J. H. Park. (2020). Exploring Gyeonggi Dream Academy in Terms of Achievements and Improvement Strategies. Korean Journal of Education Research, 58(1), 221-244. DOI: 10.30916/KERA.58.1.221   DOI
9 Kyeonggi Provincial Office of Education. (2019 b). 2019 Kyeonggi Dream Academy Manual. Kyeonggi Dream Academy(Online). https://udream.goe.go.kr
10 K. W. Lee. (2018). Teacher's Perceptions and Needs on Implement of High School Credit System. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(12), 543-567. DOI: 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.12.543   DOI
11 E. J. Lee. (2019). A Narrative Inquiry on the Experience of Operating a Physical Education Curriculum Cluster. Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education, 24(2), 89-104. DOI: 10.15831/JKSSPE.2019.24.2.89   DOI
12 L. J. Kim & K. H. Seo. (2018). Curriculum Reform through High School Credit System. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 113-138.   DOI
13 S. Y. Chang. (2020). A Study on the Revitalization of University-Linked Education for Regional Development-Focusing on the Case of University of Dreams of Gyeonggi. The Treatise on The Plastic Media, 23(2), 186-194. DOI: 10.35280/KOTPM.2020.23.2.21   DOI
14 B. S. Hong. (2016). Current Diagnosis for Convergence Education and Measures to Improve Convergence Capacity. Korean Journal of General Education, 12(10), 13-35.
15 J. P. Spradley. (2016). The Ethnographic Interview. Illinois: Waveland.
16 H. J. Seo & M. Kim. (2017). Motivation and Characteristics of Participation in College Nighttime Liberal Physical Education. Journal of Wellness, 12(1), 299-308. DOI: 10.21097/ksw.2017.02.12.1.299   DOI
17 D. J. Clandinin & M. Connelly. (2004). Knowledge, Narrative and Self-Study in International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_15
18 K. B. Cho, B. B. Ki & H. J. Lee. (2020). A Self-Study on the Physical Education Teaching Experiences of Student-Centered Curriculum. Educational Research, 77, 75-95. DOI: 10.17253/swueri.2020.77.004
19 R. D. McKenzie. (1924). The Ecological Approach to the Study of the Human Community. American Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 287-301. DOI: 10.4324/9781315087863-2   DOI