Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.6.073

A Study on Intention to Solve the Problem via the Prior Experience of Creativity Programs based on the Action Learning Methodology  

Kim, Soung-Hyun (Dept. of Phronesis School of Convergence, Kyungnam University)
Park, JaeSung (Business Incubation Center, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.6, 2021 , pp. 73-83 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study identified the factors that influence the problem solving intention of students who completed the action learning-based creativity programs based on the theory of reasoned action, and examined the influence relationship between these factors. As a result of the study, first, subjective norms of problem solving had a positive effect on problem solving intention, and second, attitude toward problem solving had a significant effect on problem solving intention. Third, it was found that students who had experience of participating in a patent education program applying the action learning methodology had a positive effect on the relationship between their attitude toward problem solving and their intention to solve the problem. These findings confirmed that in order to enhance the problem-solving intention, which is the basis for creativity of university students, it is important to spread the positive value of problem-solving within the university and to give students a positive attitude toward problem solving.
Keywords
Action Learning; Patent Application Program; Capstone Design; Problem Solving;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 J.W. Getzels. (1982). The problem of the problem, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency, 11, 37-49.
2 R.J. Hill, M. Fischbein & I. Ajzen. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. DOI : 10.2307/2065853   DOI
3 G.C. Moore & I. Benbasat. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information systems research, 2, 192-222. DOI : 10.1287/isre.2.3.192   DOI
4 J.M. Lee, J.C. Mowen & M. Minor. (1998). Instructor's Manual: John C. Mowen/Michael Minor Consumer Behavior, Prentice-Hall.
5 D. Ausubel, J. Novak & H. Hanesian. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive view, New York: Werbel & Peck.
6 G.S. Yoon. (1994). The effects of instructional control, cognitive style, and prior knowledge on learning of computer-assisted instruction, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22, 357-370. DOI : 10.2190/8avp-req0-hahc-1yjh   DOI
7 J. Park. (2018). A study on the direction of entrepreneurship education in the age of 4th Industrial Revolution: Focusing on the effect of entrepreneurship education types, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 13, 40-67. DOI : 10.24878/tkes.2018.13.1.040   DOI
8 H. Jung & S. Moon. (2012). An Analysis of Action Learning Process in Education Programs for Senior Officials, Engineers, Chief Executive Officers, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(1), 87-104. DOI : 10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.1.087   DOI
9 M.J. Marquardt. (2000). Action learning and leadership, The learning organization. DOI : 10.1108/09696470010352990
10 R.L. Dilworth & V.J. Willis. (2003). Action Learning: Images and Pathways. Professional Practices in Adult Education and Lifelong Learning Series, ERIC2003.
11 S.G. Isaksen, K.B. Dorval & D.J. Treffinger. (2010). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change, Sage Publications.
12 T.I. Lubart & C. Mouchiroud. (2003). Creativity: A source of difficulty in problem solving, The psychology of problem solving, 127-148. DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511615771.005
13 J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson & R. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
14 R.W. Revans. (1982). What is action learning?, Journal of management development. 1(3), 64-75. DOI : 10.1108/eb051529   DOI
15 H.C. Bong. (2007). Key Success Factors of Action Learning Programs in Korean Companies: Contents and Relationships, Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 25, 1-34.
16 B.J. Barron, D.L. Schwartz, N.J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech & J.D. Bransford. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning, Journal of the learning sciences, 7, 271-311. DOI : 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056   DOI
17 T.F. Mangleburg, M.J. Sirgy, D. Grewal, D. Axsom, M. Hatzios, C. Claiborne & T. Bogle. (1998). The moderating effect of prior experience in consumers' use of user-image based versus utilitarian cues in brand attitude, Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 101-113. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022927201433   DOI
18 D.L. Hoffman & T.P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations, Journal of marketing, 60, 50-68. DOI : 10.2307/1251841   DOI
19 J. Park. (2018). A Study on User Acceptance of Patent Application Education System : Focused on the Effect of Prior Knowledge, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 75-85. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.   DOI
20 S.Y. Kuh. (2015). Behavioral intentions of luxury brands : structual relations among the influences - focusing on the theory of reasoned action, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 28, 2789-2815. UCI : G704-001438.2015.28.6.015
21 J.C. Nunnally. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E, Tata McGraw-hill education. DOI : 10.2307/1175619
22 C.M. Borden. (1992). Collaboration, for better or for worse, Knowledge, 14, 133-142. DOI : 10.1177/107554709201400107   DOI
23 J. Park. (2017). How can we Develop Students' Creativity?: Redesigning a Creativity Program based on Flow Theory, Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 9, 91-98. DOI : 10.14702/JPEE.2017.091   DOI
24 H.L. Chiesi, G.J. Spilich & J.F. Voss. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18, 257-273. DOI : 10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90146-4   DOI
25 W. Alba & J. Hutchinson. (1987). Effects of Context and Post-Category on Recall of Competing Brands, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454. DOI : 10.1177/002224378502200309   DOI
26 R.J. Hill, M. Fischbein & I. Ajzen. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. DOI : 10.2307/2065853   DOI
27 A.R. Rao & K.B. Monroe. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations, Journal of consumer research, 15, 253-264. DOI : 10.1086/209162   DOI
28 S. Bailin. (2012). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity, Springer Science & Business Media. DOI : 10.3102/00028312006002287
29 R.J. Sternberg & T.I. Lubart. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development, Human development, 34, 1-31. DOI : 10.1159/000277029   DOI
30 R. Weisberg. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of creativity, New York: Freeman.
31 C.W. Park & V.P. Lessig. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics, Journal of consumer research, 8, 223-230.   DOI