Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.4.349

The Present and Future of Medical Robots: Focused on Surgical Robots  

Song, Mi Ok (Department of Nursing, Nambu University)
Cho, Yong Jin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.4, 2021 , pp. 349-353 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is a review study attempted to analyze the current situation of surgical robots based on previous research on surgical robots in the era of the 4th revolution, and to forecast the future direction of surgical robots. Surgical robots have made full progress since the launch of the da Vinci and the surgical robot is playing a role of supporting the surgeries of the surgeons or the master-slave method reflecting the intention of the surgeons. Recently, technologies are being developed to combine artificial intelligence and big data with surgical robots, and to commercialize a universal platform rather than a platform dedicated to surgery. Moreover, technologies for automating surgical robots are being developed by generating 3D image data based on diagnostic image data, providing real-time images, and integrating image data into one system. For the development of surgical robots, cooperation with clinicians and engineers, safety management of surgical robot, and institutional support for the use of surgical robots will be required.
Keywords
$4^{th}$ Industrial revolution; Medical Robot; Surgical Robot; Present; Future;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. H. Hwang, T. S. Yong & S. R. Lee. (2018) The 2nd comprehensive plan for solving problems of national life based on science and technology(2018-2022). KISTEP Inl, 26(Autumn), 38-47.
2 J. S. Lee & J. S. Choi. (2019). Technical Trends and Industrial Prospects of Surgical Robot. KEIT PD Issue Report, 19(9), 37-55.
3 S. B. Seo, C. W. Kim, G. L. Kim & S. C. Kang. (2018). Minimal Invasive Surgery Robot technology and prospects. Convergence Research Review, 4(12), 44-74.
4 H. J. You & J. H. Do. (2019). Healthcare Service Robot. KISTEP Technology Trend Report, 9(1), 4-7. retrieved from https://www.kistep.re.kr/c3/ su b7./jsp
5 S. J. Kim & H. N. Lee (2016). Nearly 10,000 robotic surgeries a year, 30 good hospitals & employees. retrieved form http://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2016/01/27/2016012703418.html
6 B. J. Lee & G, H. Kim. (2017). Surgical robotic technology trends and industry outlook. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology PD Issue Report, 17(3), 62-76.
7 W. J. Lee (2007). Current Status and Competitiveness of Robot Surgery in Korea. The Korean Hospital Association, 36(6), 64-74.
8 O. Lechky. (1985). World's First Surgical Robot in B. C. The Maclean Hunter newspaper for the Canadian medical profession, 21(23), Toronto November 12.
9 Institute for Research Ainto CAncer of the Digestive System (2001). "OPERATION LINDBERGH" A World First in TeleSurgery: The Surgical Act Crosses the Atlantic!. Atrrived from https://www.ircad.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/lindbergh_presse_en.pdf
10 S. Kalan, S. Chauhan, R. F. Coelho, M. A. Orvieto, I. R. Camacho, K. J. Palmer, V. R. Patel. (2010). History of Robotic Surgery, Journal of Robotic Surgery, 4(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2   DOI
11 H. J. K. (2020). A Study of Legal Liability of Surgery by Robot -Focused on Civil Liability-. Inha Law Review, 23(3), 63-91. https://doi.org/10.22789/IHLR.2020.09.23.3.63,   DOI
12 J. W. Shim & S. Y. Byun. (2020). Robotic Surgery Center without Robot: A Preliminary Study for Ethical Issues in Surgical Robot. Journal of Ethics, 129(1), 155-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.15801/je.1.129.202006.155   DOI
13 M. J. Kim, E. A. Park, I. R. Jo, J. H.an, H. J. Kang & G. H. Kwon. (2019). Function Extraction of Robotic Surgery Information System-based Scenario-Based Design and FRAM. The HCI Society Korea, 182-186. Proceedings.
14 A. Zia, L Guo, L. Zhou et. al. (2019). Novel Evaluation of surgical activity recognition models using task-based efficiency metrics. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 14 (12), 2155-2163.   DOI
15 S. J. Sung. (2019). Future Prospects of Robotic Gynecological surgery. The 105 th Annual Congress of Korean Society of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105, 97. Proceedings.
16 K. H. Baek. (2020). Issues of Civil Law on the Industrialization of Healthcare. The Journal of Comparative Private Law, 27(3), 31-63.   DOI
17 H. H. Kim, M. Y. Hong & B. I. Koo. (2019). Business-Creating Service Robotics System Development Project-2018 Preliminary Feasibility Study Report. Atrived form https://www.k2base.re.kr/ekp/view.do?rptNo=RES0220190184
18 C. Freschi, V. Ferrari, F. Melfi, M. Ferrari, F. Mosca & A. Cuschieri. (2013). Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 9(4).
19 Y. G. Yang. (2017). Over 10 years of introduction in Korea...How far has robot surgery come? Atrived form http://www.monews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=103933
20 O. T. Kweon. (2019). Foreign cases of robot-assisted surgery health insurance benefits. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Issue, 8(1), 1-5.
21 T. C. Chang, C. Seufert, O. Eminaga, E. Shkolyar, J. C. Hu & J. C. Liao. (2021). Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence Application for Endourology and Robotic Surgery, Urologic Clinics of North America, 48(1), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.004   DOI
22 A. Zia, A. Hung, I. Essa & A. Jarc. (2018). Surgical Activity Recognition in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy using Deep Learning. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Sep 16, 273-280