Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.4.119

The Effect of Transformational Leadership Characteristics on the Innovative Behavior of Follower -Focusing on the mediating effect of followership characteristics-  

Song, Chang-Soo (Dept. of Information Management, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University)
Dong, Haklim (Dept. of Information Management, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.4, 2021 , pp. 119-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to confirm the mediating effect of followership characteristics when the components of transformational leadership influences the innovative behavior of follower. For this study, response data of nationwide 551 workers were finally analyzed using SPSS 24 and Process Macro 3.5. The research results are as follows. All of the components of transformational leadership had a positive(+) effect on innovative behavior. In this process, team spirit, the characteristic of followership, was confirmed to have a mediating effect in all relationships. Perception of goal alignment and active orientation were found to have mediating effects in some types of combination. On the other hand, critical thinking had no mediating effect. This study has academic significance that variables with complex characteristics were divided into sub-characteristics for analyzing. In practice, it is suggested that there is an effective combination type for each characteristic of the variables in promoting the innovative behavior of follower. Based on the research results, the limitations of the research and future research tasks were presented.
Keywords
Transformational Leadership; Followership; Innovative Behavior; Mediating Effect;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 B. M. Bass & R. E. Riggio. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI : 10.4324/9781410617095
2 S. G. Scott & R. A. Bruce. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. DOI : 10.5465/256701   DOI
3 Y. Jiang & C. C. Chen. (2018). Integrating knowledge activities for team innovation: Effects of transformational leadership. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1819-1847. DOI : 10.1177/0149206316628641   DOI
4 G. Yukl. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5 K. Bjugstad, E. C. Thach, K. J. Thompson, & A. Morris. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 7(3), 304-319. DOI : 10.21818/001c.16673   DOI
6 J. M. Howell & C. A. Higgins. (1990). Champions of Technical Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341. DOI : 10.2307/2393393   DOI
7 J. M. Burns. (1978). Leadership. New York. Harper and Row.
8 B. M. Bass. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. NY: Free Press.
9 B. M. Bass. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. DOI : 10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-s   DOI
10 B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio. (1990). Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11 B. M. Bass. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. DOI : 10.1080/135943299398410   DOI
12 N. King. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr, (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, John Wiley & Sons. 15-59.
13 R. E. Kelley. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., 142-148.
14 R. E. Kelley. (1992). The power of followership: How to Create Leaders People Want to Follow and Followers Who Lead Themselves. New York, Doubleday Dell Publishing Inc.
15 H. B. Kim & Y. S. Song. (2014). The Identification and Relative Importance Analysis on Followership Competencies in Large Korean Enterprises. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 29-51. DOI : 10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.3.002   DOI
16 A. J. Colangelo. (2000). Followership: Leadership styles. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Oklahoma.
17 D. H. Yang & K. M. Koo. (2005). Influences of Follower's Characteristics on Leader-Member Exchange and Job Attitude. Korea Business Review, 34(3), 939-969.
18 J. K. Kim, K. R. Song, & H. H. Yoo. (2019). The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Innovative Behavior : Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 26(2), 1-22. DOI : 10.14396/jhrmr.2019.26.2.1   DOI
19 O. Janssen. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. DOI : 10.1348/096317900167038   DOI
20 H. A. Shih & E. Susanto. (2010). Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence, and job performance in public organizations. International Journal of Conflict Management. 21,(2), 147-168. DOI : 10.1108/10444061011037387   DOI
21 B. Shamir. (2007). From passive recipients to active co-producers: Followers' roles in the leadership process. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl, ix-xxxix, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
22 D. H. Youn & S. T. Jeong. (2006). A Study on the Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and the Innovative Behavior of Organizational Members. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 13(3), 139-169.
23 E. Y. Ryu. (2014). Collectivism Moderating Effect Using the PLS structural equation model in the Relationship Between Leadership and Innovative Behavior-For members of public corporations. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, 13(1), 233-264.
24 R. T. Keller. (2001). Cross-functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547-555. DOI : 10.2307/3069369   DOI
25 C. W. Lee & G. W. Moon. (2017). Effects of Followership Characteristics and Human Capital on Innovative Behavior : Moderating Effects of LMX. Korean Journal of Resources Development, 20(4), 75-108. DOI : 10.24991/kjhrd.2017.12.20.4.75   DOI
26 D. H. Lee, K. H. Kang, & J. B. Lee. (2009). The Influence Of Transformational Leadership And Followership On The Workers' Performance. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 16(s), 227-245.
27 J. S. Jeong. (2018). The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Self-Efficacy on Innovative Work Behavior: Focused on the Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Gachon.
28 H. Y. Jung. (2014). The Impact of Leadership-Followership Combination on the Administrative Organizational Performance : An Analysis of Mediating and Moderating Effects. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(1), 179-188. DOI : 10.5392/jkca.2014.14.01.179   DOI
29 X. Wang & J. M. Howell. (2012). A Multilevel Study of Transformational Leadership, Identification, and Follower Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly. 23, forthcoming. DOI : 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001   DOI
30 J. S. Kwon & D. S. Jeong (2012). Mediating and Moderating Variables between Leadership and Organizational Performances. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 25(4), 2575-2605
31 B. M. Bass & B. J. Avolio. (1997). Full range leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
32 D. Van Knippenberg & S. B. Sitkin. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60. DOI : 10.1080/19416520.2013.759433   DOI