1 |
Z. Zhian, (2017). Tracking Visible Features of Speech for Computer-Based Speech Therapy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Master thesis. York University. Toronto.
|
2 |
V. Yu, D. Kadis, A. Oh, D. Goshulak., A. Namasivayam, M. Pukonen. & E. Pang. (2014). Changes in voice onset time and motor speech measures in children with motor speech disorders after PROMPT therapy. Clinical Linguistic and Phonetics, 28(6), 396-412.
DOI
|
3 |
D. Kadis, D. Goshulak, A. Namasivayam, M. Pukonen, R. Kroll, L. Nil. & J. Lerch, (2014). Cortical thickness in children receiving intensive therapy for idiopathic apraxia of speech. Brain Topography, 27(2), 240-247.
DOI
|
4 |
A. Bose, P. Square, R. Schlosser. & P. Lieshout. (2001). Effects of PROMPT therapy on speech motor function in a person with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15(8), 767-785.
DOI
|
5 |
E. Ko, (2018). Educating Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children : Hakjisa
|
6 |
J. A. Bauman-Waengler, (2000) Articulatory and phonological impairments: a clinical focus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
|
7 |
K. H Kang. (2000). Improvement of alveolar sound production through speech therapy. Master thesis. Dankook University. Yongin.
|
8 |
S. Rogers, D. Hayden, S. Hepburn, R. Charlifue-Smith, T. Hall. & A .Hayes. (2006). Teaching young nonverbal children with autism useful speech: A pilot study of the Denver Model and PROMPT interventions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(8),1007-1024.
DOI
|
9 |
D. Hayden, & I Stockman. (2004). PROMPT: A tactually grounded treatment approach to speech production disorders. Movement and action in learning and development: Clinical implications for pervasive developmental disorders, 255-297
|
10 |
G. T. Baranek. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 32(5), 397-422.
DOI
|
11 |
D. Hayden. (2006). The PROMPT model: Use and application for children with mixed phonological-motor impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 8(3), 265-281.
DOI
|
12 |
D. Hayden, & P. Square. (1994). Motor speech treatment hierarchy: A systems approach. Clinics in Communication Disorders, 4(3), 162-174.
|
13 |
D. Hayden, & P. Square. (1999). VMPAC: Verbal motor production assessment for children. San Antonio; The Psychological Corporation.
|
14 |
V. Yu, D. Kadis, D. Goshulak, A. Namasivayam, M. Pukonen, R. Kroll, L. Nil. & E. Pang, (2018) Impact of Motor Speech Intervention on Neural Activity in Children with Speech Sound Disorders: Use of Magnetoencephalography. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 8, 415-429.
DOI
|
15 |
R. Ward, S. Leitao. & G. Strauss. (2014). An evaluation of the effectiveness of PROMPT therapy in improving speech production accuracy in six children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 355-371.
DOI
|
16 |
M. Grigos, D. Hayden, & J. Eigen, (2010). Perceptual and articulatory changes in speech production following PROMPT treatment. Journal of Medical Speech Pathology, 18(4), 46-53.
|
17 |
P. McCauley. & E. Strand, (2008). A review of standardized tests of nonverbal oral and speech motor performance in children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 181-91.
|
18 |
R. Mercado, K. Simpson. & K. Bellom-Rohrbacher. (2019). Effect of Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets (PROMPT) on Compensatory Articulation in Children With Cleft Palate/Lip. Global Pediatric Health.
|
19 |
R. O. Lee (2019). The Influence of Communication Mediation Program Using the In this study, communication mediation using the PROMPT. Master thesis. Daegu University. Daegu.
|
20 |
L. Shriberg. (2002). Classification and misclassification of child speech sound disorders. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech Language and Hearing Association. Atlanta, GA: Nov.
|
21 |
J. Gierut. (1998). Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 42, 85-100.
|
22 |
R. Waring. & R. Knight. (2013). How should children with speech sound disorders be classified? A review and critical evaluation of current classification systems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 48, 25-40.
DOI
|
23 |
A. Namasivayam, M. Pukonen, D. Goshulak, V. Yu,, D. Kadis, R. Kroll. & L. Nil. (2013). Changes in speech intelligibility following motor speech treatment in children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(3), 264-80.
DOI
|
24 |
M. J. Shin et al. (2018). Speech Mechanism Screening Test for Children : An Evaluation of Performance in 3- to 12-Year-Old Normal Developing Children. Communication Sciences and Disorders. 23(1).180-197.
DOI
|
25 |
E. T. Kim et al (2018). Validity and reliability analyses for the development of urimal test of articulation and phonology-2. Communication Sciences and Disorders. 23(4). 959-970.
DOI
|