Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.1.361

Effects of Teacher's Commnunicative Behaviors on Instructor and Class Evaluations: by Student Personalty Traits and Communication Characteristics  

Ahn, Horim (School of Liberal Arts, Incheon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.1, 2021 , pp. 361-371 More about this Journal
Abstract
Communication education research has focused on the effects of instructor characteristics on learning. It is necessary to consider student characteristics as well to develop an effective teaching strategy. The current study tries to classify students into multiple distinct groups depending on their personality traits and communication characteristics and investigates differences in effects of teacher characteristics between those groups. A survey on unversity students was conducted to collect data. A cluster analysis was carried out to identify distint sub-groups of respondents by their personality traits and communication characteristics. The analysis yielded two distinct groups. The two groups were named stable-reticent group', and 'neurotic-talkative group' respectivley. Series of multiple regression were carried out in order to investigate differences in the effects of instructor characteristics. The analyses found different patterns of effects between the two sub-groups. The findings suggest that it is necessary to adopt different communication styles and teaching strategies depending on student types.
Keywords
big-five personlity traits; communication apprehension; talkativeness; communication style; teacher authority; teacher concern;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. C. McCroskey, K. M. Valencic & V. P. Richmond. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 197-210.   DOI
2 T. Chamorro-Premuzica & A. Furnham. (2009). Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits andlearning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524-529.   DOI
3 M. Komarraju, S. J. Karau, R. R. Schmeck & A. Avdic. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personaloty and Individual Differences, 51, 472-477.   DOI
4 D. Ahn, & J. Youn. (2009). Birth order and personality as predictors of adolescents' academic achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 23(3), 623-643.
5 B. Chin, S.Yun, S. Cho & B, Ham. (2005). A Study of Relationships among Academic Achievement, Character-Temperament in High School Student. Journal of Korean Association of Social Psychiatry, 25(2), 32-37.
6 Y. J. Lee & Y. Choi. (2013). Cognitive Ability and Personality as Predictors of Academic Performance: Science Gifted Students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. 23(4). 523-525.   DOI
7 G. W. Allport. (1937). Personality: a psychological interpretation. Holt.
8 R. R. McCrae & P. T. Costa. (1987). Validation of Five-Factor Model of Personality A Cross instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.   DOI
9 M. J. Smythe & J. A. Hess. (2005). Are student self-reports a valid method for measuring teacher nonverbal immediacy? Communication Education, 54, 170-179.   DOI
10 V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1990). Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449-450.   DOI
11 P. Schrodt, P. L. Witt & P, D. Turman. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308-332.   DOI
12 A. Q. Staton-Spicer & R. E. Bassett. (1979). Communication concerns of preservice and inservice elementary school teachers. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 138-146.   DOI
13 J. C. McCroskey, V. P. Richmond, T. G. Plax & P. Kearney. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.   DOI
14 J. F., Jr., Hair & W. C. Black, (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
15 J. L. Chesebro. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52, 135-147.   DOI
16 J. C, McCroskey, (1982). Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization. Communication Yearbook, 6, 136-170.
17 I. S. Lee. (2003). An Analysis of Big 5 Personality Model and Business Ethics as Factors for Organizational Effectiveness. Korean management review, 32(6). 1593-1621.
18 P. T, Costa & R. R. McCrae, (1992). The NEO personality inventory(NEO-PI-R) professional manua.l. Odessa, FL: psychological assessment resources.
19 J. F. Salgado. (1997). The five model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82. 30-43.   DOI
20 T. Y. Yoo & B. M. Min. (2001). Predictability of Big-Five personality model to performance in a variety of settings and its limitation : A meta-analysis. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 14(2), 115-134.
21 J. C. McCroskey, A. D. Heisel & V. P. Richmond. (2001). Eysenck's BIG THREE and communication traits: Three correlational studies. Communication Monographs, 68, 360-366.   DOI
22 V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1998). Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23 J. C. McCroskey, & M. J. Beatty. (1999). Communication apprehension. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.). Communication and personality: Trait perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
24 J. C. McCroskey, S. Booth-Butterfield & S. K. Payne. (1989). The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success. Communication Quarterly, 37, 100-107.   DOI
25 P. M. Ericson & J. W. Gardner. (1992). Two longitudinal studies of communication apprehension and its effects on college students' success. Communication Quarterly, 40, 127-137.   DOI
26 S. D. Fortney, D. I. Johnson & K. M. Long. (2001). The impact of compulsive communicators on the self-perceived competence of classroom peers: An investigation and test of instructional strategies. Communication Education, 50, 343-356.   DOI
27 J. C. McCroskey & M. E. Sheahan. (1978). Communication apprehension, social preference, and social behavior in a college environment. Communication Quarterly, 26, 41-45.   DOI
28 H. Ahn. (2013). A Study on the Influence of Communicational Factors between Instructor and Student on Education : Exploring the Characteristics of Communication in Situations and the Behavior Model. Doctoral Dissertation. HanYang University. Seoul.
29 J. C. McCroskey & V. P. Richmond. (1993). Identifying compulsive talkers: The Talkaholic Scale. Communication Research Reports, 10, 107-114.   DOI
30 J. Song & J. Lee, (2014). Career Preparation Behavior Differences on Cluster Types based on Big Five Personality Traits and Achievement Goal Orientations among College Students. Korean Journal of Counseling. 15(3). 1183-1198.   DOI
31 M. E. Costache, A. Frick, K. Mansson, J. Engman, V, Faria, O, Hjorth, et al. (2020). Higher and lower-order personality traits and cluster subtypes in social anxiety disorder. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0232187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232187   DOI
32 V. P. Richmond. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.   DOI
33 V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125-136.   DOI
34 T. G. Plax, P. Kearney, J. C. McCroskey & V. P. Richmond. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.   DOI
35 F. F. Fuller. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 207-226.   DOI
36 J. C. McCroskey, J. M. Fayer, V. P. Richmond, A. Sallinen & R. A. Barraclough. (1996). A multicultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44, 297-307.   DOI
37 P. Schrodt, P. L. Witt, & P. D. Turman, (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308-332.   DOI
38 P. D, Turman & P. Schrodt, (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265-279.   DOI
39 K. Weber, M. M.. Martin & S. A. Myers. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60(1), 51-74.   DOI
40 A. K. Goodboy & S. A. Myers. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57(2), 153-179.   DOI
41 A. K. Goodboy & M. M., Martin, (2005). Student motives for communicating with their instructors: A validity study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
42 B. N. Frysby & M. M. Martin. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146-164.   DOI
43 J. K. Kim & H. Ah., (2014). The Relatioship between Instructors' and Students' Communication Characteristics and Educational effects. Korean Jouranl of Communication Studies. 22(1). 65-93.
44 S. Kim, J. Kim, J. Yoo. K. Bae, S. Kim, S. Yang, I. Shin, & J. Yoon. (2010). Standardization and Validation of Big Five Inventory-Korean Version(BFI-K) in Elders. Korean Jouranl of Biological Psychiatry. 17(1). 15-25.