Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.12.051

Development of the Factors for Evaluating Performance of the Professional Career Personnel Invitation Program  

Kim, Mi-Hye (Department of Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
Park, Hye-Jin (Center for Teaching and Learning, Konkuk University)
Kim, Yong-Young (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.12, 2021 , pp. 51-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study developed the factors capable of systematic/comprehensive evaluation of the task performance in order to strengthen the performance management of the professional career personnel invitation program (PCPIP). To this end, a performance evaluation framework was developed by analyzing existing project evaluation studies based on boundary theory and Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model. Afterwords, through two Delphi surveys, evaluation factors that can measure performance in terms of individual and invitation institutions of PCP were derived and validated. With this procedure, five evaluation factors were finally selected: adaptability, connectivity, clarity, compatibility, and expandability. This study has implications suggesting a performance evaluation factors capable of hybrid quantitative/qualitative evaluation for the performance management of PCPIP operated by National Research Foundation of Korea Research since 1994.
Keywords
Professional Career Personnel; Performance Evaluation; Delphi Technique; Boundary Theory; Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. G. Moon & C. H. Park. (2016). Evaluation on the Gvernmental Demonstration Project on Character Education for Young Children. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 21(4), 475-496. UCI: G704-000666.2016.21.4.014
2 Dalkey, N, Rourke, D.L., Lewis, R., & Snyder, D.(1973), Studies in the Quality of Life: Delphi and Decision Making, Lexington: D.C. Health&Co.
3 J. S. Lee. (2001). The Delphi Method. Seoul: Kyoyookboook.
4 C. Lee & B. Y. Jung. (2016). A Study on Development Indicators of Audit and Performance Evaluation of National Human Resource Development Consortium. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 48(2), 25-53. DOI: 10.23840/agehrd.2016.48.2.25   DOI
5 O. James. (2002). Evaluating Executive Agencies in UK Government. Public Policy and Administration. 16(3), 24-52. DOI: 10.1177/095207670101600303   DOI
6 Y. J. Soung & A. J. Hong. (2010). Analysis on the Validity of Evaluation Items for ODA Projects in Vocational Education and Training. The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD, 6(3), 45-67. DOI: 10.35637/klehrd.2010.6.3.003   DOI
7 S. M. Lee & E. B. Lee. (2013). A Proposal of the Improvement Plan for Professional Experience Personnel Invitation Program. Journal of Institute for Social Sciences, 24(3), 211-231. UCI : G704-SER000011721.2013.24.3.013
8 B. E. Ashforth, G. E. Kreiner & M. Fugate. (2000). All in a Day's Work. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472-491. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2000.3363315   DOI
9 D. L. Kirkpatrick (1959). Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Journal of American Society of Training Directors, 11, 1-13.
10 T. R. Kim & H. J. Ahn. (2007). A Study on Trends of Performance Evaluations on Performance Evaluation Indicator. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 1097-1118. UCI: G704-000253.2007.19.4.008
11 S. Y. Park & H. Y. Shin. (2016). Building an Evaluation Model for Official Development Aids in Higher Education. Journal of International Area Studies, 19(4), 23-50. DOI: 10.18327/jias.2016.01.19.4.23   DOI
12 K. H. Kim. (2005). A Study of Educational Environments in Island Areas of Korea. The Journal of Educational Administration, 23(2), 471-497. UCI: G704-000511.2005.23.2.003
13 Y. M. Lee. (2012). Examining the Perceived Impacts of Training Programs for Small and Midium-sized Corporation Employees' Competency Development on Their Performance, Using the CIPP Evaluation Model. The Journal of Training and Development, 24, 1-20. UCI: G704-SER000002289.2012..24.003
14 J. Y. Seo. (2012). An Evaluation Study on the Korean Community Education Support Program. The Politics of Education, 19(4), 211-229. UCI: G704-SER000009222.2012.19.4.006
15 Ziglio, E.(1996), The Delphi Method and Its Contribution to Decision-Making, London: Jesscia Kingsley Publishers, 3-33.
16 J. W. Gilley, S. A. Eggland, & A. M. Gilley. (2002). Principles of Human Resource Development (2nd ed.), Cambridge, MA: Perseus
17 S. Yardley & T. Dornan. (2012). Kirkpatrick's Levels and Education 'Evidence', Medical Education, 46(1), 97-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x   DOI
18 K. S. Song & G. S. Lee. (2004). Performance Evaluation of Metropolitan Government. Korean Public Administration Review, 38(6), 179-200. UCI: G704-000298.2004.38.6.014
19 D. N. Ammons. (1995). Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement on Local Government. Public Administration Review. 55(1), 37-47. DOI: 10.2307/976826   DOI
20 S. A. Park, H. Y. Na & H. Y. Lee. (2019). A Study on Effectiveness of Performance Management. Journal of Local Government Studies, 31(2), 1-24. DOI: 10.21026/jlgs.2019.31.2.1   DOI
21 Y. H. Park & J. H. Chang. (2019). A Delphi Study on Development of Performance Evaluation Indicators for Safety and Health Training Programs. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(3), 113-132. DOI: 10.18211/kjhrdq.2019.21.3.005   DOI
22 S. J. Ju. (2017). A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Indicators for Performance Measurement of Educational Welfare Priority Project. Social Science Research, 33(1), 107-129. DOI: 10.18859/ssrr.2017.02.33.1.107   DOI