Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.10.015

The Study on the Significance of Social Problem-solving Living Lab Project Class in University and Development of an Toolkit to derive Effective Problem Definition  

Park, Hyung-Woong (Cultural Industry Research Center, JEONJU University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.19, no.10, 2021 , pp. 15-20 More about this Journal
Abstract
The crisis of university must be overcome by emphasizing the acquisition and use of knowledge for students to participate in and solve contemporary and diverse social/regional problems through educational method innovation. University classes should be a way of contributing to solving human problems, the UN's Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) and various issues in the community. This study focused on project-based learning to cultivate socially engaged and problem-solving talents. In addition, a problem definition toolkit model was produced and tested to improve problem solving ability. Through follow-up research, I plan to develop a performance measurement model corresponding to the field application-improvement-feedback of Living Lab project classes, and suggest a method that universities can easily apply to the existing curriculum.
Keywords
Problem Defining; Living Lab; Problem Solving; Project Based Learning; Toolkit;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate-General (2009), "Living Labs for user-driven open innovation: An overview of the Living Labs methodology, activities and achievements", KK-30-08-803-EN-C, EC Publication Office, DOI: 10.2759/34481
2 KNOLL. (2021. May). Current Status of Living Lab in University. Living Lab Trends and Issues of KNOLL, 7, 1-109.
3 K. A. Kim. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Properties and Potentials for User-Driven Innovation Model, INNOVATION STUDIES, 12(1), 213-240.   DOI
4 BISTEP. (2020). User-driven Digital Innovation Strategy of Service Industry in Busan. Busan : BISTEP
5 E. C. Hwang. (2020). The Direction of Innovation in Curriculum of Universities in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 25(11), 229-238.   DOI
6 J. E. Sung & I. Y. Park. (2015. Sep.). Taiwan's User-Based Innovation and ICT Living Lab. Newsletter of STEPI, 21, 1-26
7 P. Evans, D. Schuurman, A. Stahlbrost & K. Vervoort. (2017). Living Lab Methodology Handbook. European Network of Living Labs : U4IoT.
8 D. Chroneer, A. Stahlbrost & A. Habibipour. (2018). Towards a unified definition of Urban Living Labs, The ISPIM Innovation Conference.
9 Almirall, E., Lee, M. and Wareham, J. (2012). Mapping living labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 12-18.   DOI
10 J. E. Sung, K. Y. Han, W. C. Song & M. S. Kim. (2019). Current Status and Tasks of Campus Living Labs as a New Model for Innovation, THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, 26(2), 171-195.   DOI
11 S. H. Kim. (2019. Nov.) Curriculum design using Living Lab-liberal arts science-. Korean Society for Thought and Expression(pp. 165-171)
12 Y. I. Bae. (2019). A study on the Application Method of Living Labs to Reginal Innovation Activation. Suwon : Gyeonggi Research Institute.
13 J. Eskelinen, A. G. Robles, I. Lindy, J. Marsh & A. Muente-Kunigami. (2015). Citizen-Driven Innovation A guidebook for city mayors and public administrators. Wasgington : World Bank and the European Network of Living Labs.
14 Ballon, P. and Schuurman, D. (2015). Living labs: concepts, tools and cases, info, 17(4), DOI:10.1108/info-04-2015-0024   DOI
15 Y. J. Kim. & S. H. Kim. (2021). An Analysis of the Effect of Living Lab Project Experience Education for Urban Planning and Design Students, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 22(4), 378-385.   DOI