[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.9.049

Investigating the Effects of Corrective Feedback about Learners' English Writing through Flipped Learning on English Improvement and the Factors Influencing Class Satisfaction

Hwang, Hee-Jeong (Dept. of Liberal Arts, Jungwon University)

Publication Information

Journal of Digital Convergence / v.18, no.9, 2020 , pp. 49-56 More about this Journal

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of CF about learners' English writing through FL on English improvement and the factors that influence class satisfaction. For achieving this purpose, response to CF and feelings about CF were selected as predictive variables. It is intended to investigate how these variables predict learners' satisfaction. A total of 94 university students were placed into two groups: 48 experimental group, who received CF on their writing through FL, and 46 control group given traditional instruction. All the participants took pre/post tests including writing tasks, and the experimental group completed a questionnaire after the instructional treatment. The findings indicated that FL affected English improvement and both response to CF and feelings about CF predicted class satisfaction. Based on the findings, this study sheds light on the implications of how to manage the FL class efficiently.

Keywords

Flipped Learning (FL); Corrective Feedback (CF); Indirect CF; Direct CF; Treatable Errors;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	L. Johnson & J. Renner. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. 9Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
2	M. Ahn. (2016). A study of the factors that influence the flipped class and learner satisfaction level. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 19(1). 114-136.
3	H. Hung. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. ERIC, 28(1), 81-96.
4	K. Sung. (2015). A case study on flipped classroom in an EFL content course. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(2), 159-187. DOI
5	J. Bishop & M. Verleger. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, US. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/22585.
6	K. Hong. (2016). A critical analysis on implementing the flipped classroom. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(1), 125-149. DOI
7	J. Bergmann & A. Sams. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. Washington DC: International Scoeity for Technology in Education.
8	K. Fulton. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 122-17.
9	J. Truscott. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369. DOI
10	D. Ferris. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott 1996. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10. DOI
11	R. Ellis. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18. DOI
12	Y. Sheen. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. London: Springer.
13	R. Ellis, H. Basturkmen, & S. Loewen. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407-432. DOI
14	J. Chandler. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296. DOI
15	D. Ferris. (2004). The grammar correction debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62. DOI
16	M. Joo, S. Park, & M. Cha. (2017). The effects on learners' academic achievement, self-directed learning ability, and learning satisfaction in English reading and writing flipped learning course. Modern Studies in English Language & Literature, 61(2), 175-197. DOI
17	D. B. Kim. (2005). Written feedback: Assessing Korean learners' viewpoints and strategies for dealing with them. The Journal of English Education, 31, 7-18.
18	S. D. Loreto, & K. McDonough. (2013). The relationship between instructor feedback and ESL student anxiety. TESL CANADA JOURNAL, 31(1), 20-42.
19	N. Kang. (2015). The comparison between regular and flipped classrooms for EFL Korean adult learners. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 41-72. DOI
20	H. Lee. (2015). The effects of English teaching-learning on learners' English improvement and affective factors through flipped learning in a university ESP class. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 20(3), 73-99. DOI
21	G. Yim & K. Rha. (2017). Effects of using flipped learning in the college setting on students' English achievement and class satisfaction. Studies in Linguistics, 44, 289-307. DOI
22	E. Son, J. Park, I. Im, Y. Lim, & S. Hong. (2015). Impact of flipped learning applied at a class on learning motivation of collage students. The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 6(2), 97-117.
23	J. Bergmann & A. Sams. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. New York: International Society for Technology in Education.
24	C. Baker. (2012). Flipped classrooms: turning learning upside down: Trend of flipping classrooms helps teachers to personalize education. Deseret News, Nov. 25.
25	A. Butt. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33-43.
26	J. Seo. (2015). A study on the operation of convergence-based English subjects using flipped learning methodology - centered around screen English, SNS English and TED English. Korean Journal of General Education, 9(3), 193-214.
27	J. Lim. (2015). A study of flipped instructional model and application for pre-service teachers of English. English Language & Literature Teaching, 21(2), 157-173.