Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.11.539

University students' efficacy in real-time online class as alternative methodology due to Corona virus(COVID-19) events  

Baek, Jongnam (Dept. of Special Education, Woosuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.18, no.11, 2020 , pp. 539-545 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was designed to find out the efficacy of college students' lecture participation in online real-time lectures conducted at university due to the Corona virus events. Participants in this study are 701 students attending the W University in the J region and participating in real-time online lectures. The tools of this study consisted of four factors: interaction, learning improvement, adaptation, and accessibility. The results of this study are as follows: First, accessibility is the highest efficacy among college students' real-time online lectures participation and interaction is the lowest. Second, the efficacy of real-time online lecture participation of university students differed according to gender, grade, major, and access devices. This study is meaningful in that it confirmed the applicability of real-time online teaching method due to corona virus and confirmed the applicability of real-time online teaching as a method to prepare for the arrival of full-scale distance education in the post-Corona era. Lastly, it was suggested that the online class management method and support for each college major reflect the changes of the times.
Keywords
Corona virus(COVID-19); real-time online class; efficacy; university student; digital convergence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 T. H. Gwon. (2020. 3. 16). Professor and student confusion due to college online lecture server 'down' on the first day of class. SBS News, 2020. 3 .16, https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1005700152
2 J. Baek, Y. Baek, S. Kim, & S. Choi. (2020). Teaching competencies of university professors in future society. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(6), 349-357. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.6.349   DOI
3 Munhwa.com. (2020. 5. 4.). 19 "New Trends" in the "Post Corona 19 Era". Munhwa.com, 2020. 5. 17, http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=2020050401031442000001
4 M. H. Kim. (2020). Development of learning motivation measurement in e-learning. Master's dissertation. Korea National Open University, Seoul.
5 H. Y. Park, & K. R. Kang. (2001). Development of classroom lesson-directed concentration model. Educational Research Journal, 5, 127-156.
6 H. Lee, S. H. Park, & J. Jin. (2019). Effects of real-time online team teaching interpretation course on perception and interpretation ability. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 256-274.
7 N. H. Gwon. (2018). A study on the real-time bidirectional education system for cyber university: Focusing on the real-time bidirectional lecture screen UI. Master's dissertation. Kookmin University, Seoul.
8 C. J. Bonk & Ke Zhang. (2006). Introducting the R2D2 Model: Online learning for the diverse learners of this world. Distance Education, 27(2), 249-264. DOI: 10.1080/01587910600789670   DOI
9 K. W. Lam, A. Hassan, T. Sulaiman, & N. Kamarudin. (2018). Evaluating the face and content validity of an instructional technology competency instrument for university lectures in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5), 367-385. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i5/4108   DOI
10 T. Irani, C. Scherler, M. Harrington, & R. Telg. (2000, December). Overcoming barriers to learning in distance education: The effects of personality type and course perceptions on student performance. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Conference.
11 D. Norman. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
12 L. Shashaani. (1997). Gender differences in computer ttitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37-51. DOI: 10.2190/Y8U7-AMMA-WQUT-R512   DOI
13 P. Schumacher & J. Morahan-Martin. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95-110. DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7   DOI
14 A. Padilla-Melendez, A. R. del Aguila-Obra, & A. Garrido-Moreno. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014   DOI
15 M. M. Handelsman, W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan, & A. Towler. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191. DOI: 10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192   DOI
16 J. Baek. (2020). Path model for presence factors affecting expectations and concerns of using virtual simulation in special education. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(2), 475-482. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.475   DOI
17 A. Bhargava, A. Kirova-Petrova, & S. McNair. (1999). Computers, gender bias, and young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 263-274.