1 |
T. H. Gwon. (2020. 3. 16). Professor and student confusion due to college online lecture server 'down' on the first day of class. SBS News, 2020. 3 .16, https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1005700152
|
2 |
J. Baek, Y. Baek, S. Kim, & S. Choi. (2020). Teaching competencies of university professors in future society. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(6), 349-357. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.6.349
DOI
|
3 |
Munhwa.com. (2020. 5. 4.). 19 "New Trends" in the "Post Corona 19 Era". Munhwa.com, 2020. 5. 17, http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=2020050401031442000001
|
4 |
M. H. Kim. (2020). Development of learning motivation measurement in e-learning. Master's dissertation. Korea National Open University, Seoul.
|
5 |
H. Y. Park, & K. R. Kang. (2001). Development of classroom lesson-directed concentration model. Educational Research Journal, 5, 127-156.
|
6 |
H. Lee, S. H. Park, & J. Jin. (2019). Effects of real-time online team teaching interpretation course on perception and interpretation ability. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 256-274.
|
7 |
N. H. Gwon. (2018). A study on the real-time bidirectional education system for cyber university: Focusing on the real-time bidirectional lecture screen UI. Master's dissertation. Kookmin University, Seoul.
|
8 |
C. J. Bonk & Ke Zhang. (2006). Introducting the R2D2 Model: Online learning for the diverse learners of this world. Distance Education, 27(2), 249-264. DOI: 10.1080/01587910600789670
DOI
|
9 |
K. W. Lam, A. Hassan, T. Sulaiman, & N. Kamarudin. (2018). Evaluating the face and content validity of an instructional technology competency instrument for university lectures in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5), 367-385. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i5/4108
DOI
|
10 |
T. Irani, C. Scherler, M. Harrington, & R. Telg. (2000, December). Overcoming barriers to learning in distance education: The effects of personality type and course perceptions on student performance. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Conference.
|
11 |
D. Norman. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
|
12 |
L. Shashaani. (1997). Gender differences in computer ttitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37-51. DOI: 10.2190/Y8U7-AMMA-WQUT-R512
DOI
|
13 |
P. Schumacher & J. Morahan-Martin. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95-110. DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7
DOI
|
14 |
A. Padilla-Melendez, A. R. del Aguila-Obra, & A. Garrido-Moreno. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
DOI
|
15 |
M. M. Handelsman, W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan, & A. Towler. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191. DOI: 10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
DOI
|
16 |
J. Baek. (2020). Path model for presence factors affecting expectations and concerns of using virtual simulation in special education. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(2), 475-482. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.475
DOI
|
17 |
A. Bhargava, A. Kirova-Petrova, & S. McNair. (1999). Computers, gender bias, and young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 263-274.
|