Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.9.349

The Current State and Activating Strategies of Korea's Maker Movement : Focusing on the Effect of Maker Community Participation  

Lee, Jin-Suk (Department of Business Administration, Dongguk University)
Chun, Seung-Woo (Department of Business Administration, Dongguk University)
Kwon, Ji-Eun (Department of Intelligent Engineering Informatics for Human, Sangmyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.9, 2019 , pp. 349-359 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated the current state of Korean Maker Movement and explored the ways for activating Maker Movement in Korea. To do this purpose, we analyzed the data of 'A survey of the Korea Maker Movement in the second half of 2018', conducted by Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity involved 20's~50's Koreans. As a results, first, awareness, interest and behavior intention of Maker Movement was not high in Korea. Second, there were significant different between participants and non-participants of Maker Community in Maker awareness and Maker activities. Third, the positive relation between Maker Community participation and Maker Orientation is parallel multiple mediated by Maker activating motives such as fun, relieving stress, expressing own idea, saving cost, social recognition. Lastly, based upon the results, we presented several ways to activate Maker Movement in Korea.
Keywords
Maker; Maker Movement; Maker Culture; Maker Community; Community Participation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 D. Dougherty. (2012) The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11-14. DOI : 10.1162/INOV_a_00135   DOI
2 K. Peppler & S. Bender. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. DOI : 10.1177/003172171309500306   DOI
3 A. F. Hayes. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
4 H. W. Shin & K. S. Lee. (2017). A Critical Review for Koreas Maker Culture Trends : Between National Development Discourse of Maker and Possibilities in The Everyday Culture. Humanities Contents, 45(45), 207-231. DOI : 10.18658/humancon.2017.06.45.207   DOI
5 M. Hatch. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
6 Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity, A survey of the Korea Maker Movement in first half of 2018, 2018. 03.
7 S. Kwak, Y. Baek & J. Kwon. (2019). Service Design Guideline for Maker Space. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 389-397. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.389   DOI
8 L. Martin. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4. DOI : 10.7771/2157-9288.1099   DOI
9 D. Dougherty. (2016). Free to make: How the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
10 R. E. Browder, H. E. Aldrich & S. W. Bradley. (2019). The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 459-476. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005   DOI
11 C. Anderson. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.
12 B. R. Kwon & J. Lee. (2017). What makes a maker: the motivation for the maker movement in ICT. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 318-335. DOI : 10.1080/02681102.2016.1238816   DOI
13 R. Kanfer & F. H. Kanfer. (1991). Goals self-regulation: Applications or theory to work settings'. ML Maehr and PR Pintrich (edn), Advances in Motivation and Achievement vol, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 287-326.
14 J. Hagel, J. S. Brown & D. Kulasooriya. (2013). A movement in the making. Deloitte.
15 P. J. Teixeira, A. L. Palmeira & M. Vansteenkiste. (2012). The role of self-determination theory and motivational interviewing in behavioral nutrition, physical activity, and health: an introduction to the IJBNPA special series. International Journal of Behavioral nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 17. DOI : 10.1186/1479-5868-9-17.   DOI
16 D. Lee & S. Lee. (1999). Consumer Behavior. Seoul. Young-Poong Press.
17 K. S. Courneya & L. A. M. Hellsten. (1998). Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers and preferences: An application of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual differences, 24(5), 625-633. DOI : 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00231-6   DOI
18 S. S. Atakan, R. P. Bagozzi & C. Yoon. (2014). Make it your own: How process valence and self-construal affect evaluation of self-made products. Psychology & marketing, 31(6), 451-468. DOI : 10.1002/mar.20707   DOI
19 R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. DOI : 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020   DOI
20 M. A. Halbinger. (2018). The role of makerspaces in supporting consumer innovation and diffusion: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 47(10), 2028-2036. DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.008   DOI
21 C. Foster, M. Lande & S. Jordan. (2014). An ethos of sharing in the maker community. In Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and EXposition. Indianapolis, IN.
22 M. G. Seo, L. F. Barrett & J. M. Bartunek. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 423-439. DOI : 10.5465/amr.2004.13670972   DOI
23 S. Schon, M. Ebner & S. Kumar. (2014). The Maker Movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. eLearning papers, 39, 14-25.