Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.177

Effects of Shared Leadership, Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Justice on Organizational Commitment  

Park, Eun-Mi (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
Seo, Joung-Hae (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.6, 2019 , pp. 177-184 More about this Journal
Abstract
The environment of modern corporate management is undergoing many changes due to the horizontal organizational structure and the spread of team system. The importance of collective leadership that all members can pursue together beyond the existing personal leadership is increasing day by day. This study was conducted to analyze the effects of shared leadership on psychological empowerment, organizational justice and organizational commitment using PLS, a structural equation tool. The analysis highlighted the following. First, shared leadership exerted positive effects on psychological empowerment and organizational justice. Second, psychological empowerment exerted positive effects on organizational justice and organizational commitment and lastly, organizational justice exerted positive effects on organizational commitment. The causality between shared leadership, psychological empowerment, organizational justice and organizational commitment. This study demonstrated the important relationship between shared leadership and psychological empowerment and organizational justice, which will serve as a guideline for further organizational commitment.
Keywords
Shared Leadership; Psychological Empowerment; Organizational Justice; Organizational Commitment; PLS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim, Y. K. & Park, S. T. (2018). Impacts of Innovation Motives and Activities on Innovation Performance. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(8).
2 Park, S. T., Choi, S, M. & Kim, Y. K. (2017). Effects of Patent Infringement Response Activities and Patent-based Activities on Corporate Image and Management Performance. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. 15(2), 119-127.
3 Perry, M. L., Pearce, C. L. & Sims Jr, H. P. (1999). Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19(3), 35-51.
4 Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 114-125.   DOI
5 Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.   DOI
6 Jackson, S. E., DeNisi, A., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (Vol. 21). John Wiley & Sons.
7 Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.   DOI
8 Sanders, T. O. (2006). Collectivity and influence: The nature of shared leadership and its relationship with team learning orientation, vertical leadership and team effectiveness. ProQuest.
9 Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 47-57.   DOI
10 Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.   DOI
11 Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative science quarterly, 346-355.
12 Adams, V. H., Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., King, E. A., Sigmon, D. R. & Pulvers, K. M. (2002). Hope in the workplace. Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance, 367-377.
13 Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425.   DOI
14 Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
15 Gandz, J., & Bird, F. G. (1996). The ethics of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(4), 383-392.   DOI
16 Suazo, M. M. (2003). An examination of antecedents and consequences of psychological contract breach (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning).
17 Pearce, C. L. & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work.
18 Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage.
19 Kizilos, P. (1990). Crazy about Empowerment?. Training, 27(12).
20 Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.   DOI
21 Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.   DOI
22 Tymon, W. G. (1988). An empirical investigation of a cognitive model of empowerment (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University).
23 Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C. & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human relations, 56(1), 61-84.   DOI
24 Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India.
25 Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship". Academy of management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.   DOI
26 Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.   DOI
27 Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 171.   DOI
28 Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669.   DOI
29 Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.   DOI
30 Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review, 13(3), 471-482.   DOI
31 Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies: special issue on research methodology, 2(2), 284-324.
32 Konovsky, M. A. & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 698.   DOI
33 Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.   DOI
34 Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.
35 Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. & Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-hill.
36 Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.   DOI
37 Chin, W. W. & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS quarterly, 237-246.
38 Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
39 Orpen, C. (1993). The effect of organizational cultural norms on the relationships between personnel practices and employee commitment. The Journal of psychology, 127(5), 577-579.   DOI