1 |
D. R. Malhiwsky. (2010). Student achievement using Web 2.0 technologies: A mixed methods study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska.
|
2 |
D. Nunan. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
|
3 |
D. Hazzard. (2006). Motivating ESL/EFL students to use English through movie making. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(12), Retrieved March 30. 2011 from: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/HazzardMakingMovies.html
|
4 |
B. Kelsen. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with gollege EFL students in Taiwan. Call-EJ Online, 10(2), 1-18.
|
5 |
C. A. Mayora. (2009). Using YouTube to encourage authentic writing in EFL classrooms. TESL Reporter, 42(1), 1-12.
|
6 |
K. H. Pong. (2010). Learners' anxieties on posting their own speeches on Youtube. com: Facilitative or debilitative? In Selected Papers from the Third Conference on College English: College English Issues and Trends, 3, 73-100.
|
7 |
M. Warschauer & D. Grimes. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23.
DOI
|
8 |
J. E. Hanley, C. A. Herron, & S. P. Cole. (1995). Using video as an advance organizer to a written passage in the FLES classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 57-66.
DOI
|
9 |
C. Canning-Wilson & J. Wallace. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11), Retrieved November 30, 2015, from the World Wide Web: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html
|
10 |
R. B. Lockwood. (2014). Flip it! Strategies for the ESL classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
|
11 |
T. Jones & K. Cuthrell. (2011). YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 75-85.
DOI
|
12 |
H. W. Marshall & A. DeCapua. (2013). Making the transition to classroom success: Culturally responsive teaching for struggling language learners. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
|
13 |
I. Kostka, & R. B. Lockwood. (2015). What's on the internet for flipping English language instruction. Tesl-Ej, 19(2), 1-12.
|
14 |
S. Britsch. (2009). ESOL educators and the experience of visual literacy. Tesol Quarterly, 43(4), 710-721.
DOI
|
15 |
N. Y. Kim. (2018). Corpus technology and video technology: Effects on EFL argumentative writing. New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature, 60(2), 195-217.
DOI
|
16 |
F. Harun & S. Hussin. (2017). The acceptance of flipped language learning (FLL): A study of engineering students at technical matriculation college. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(24), 14495-14504.
|
17 |
H. Daller & D. Phelan. (2006). The C-test and TOEIC(R) courses in EFL. In Grotjahn, R. (Ed.), Der C-Test: Theorie, Empirie, Anwendungen/ The C-test: Theory, empirical research, applications. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 101-119.
|
18 |
S. Gilfert. (1996). A review of TOEIC. The Internet TESL Journal, 2(8), Retrieved March 3, 2017 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Gilfert-TOEIC.html
|
19 |
J. Baek. (2016). Implicit cognitive strategies of EFL college reading. Studies in Linguistics, 38, 285-313.
DOI
|
20 |
J. Brook. (2011). The affordances of YouTube for language learning and teaching. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 9(1-2), 37-56.
|
21 |
A. Alm. (2006). CALL for autonomy, competence and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in Web 2.0. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(3), 29-38.
DOI
|
22 |
B. Dieu, A. P. Campbell, & R. Ammann. (2006). P2P and learning ecologies in EFL/ESL. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 6(3), Retrieved March 30, 2011 from: http://www.tewtjournal.org/VOL%206/ISSUE%203/02_P2PANDLEARNIN G.pdf
|