Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.3.035

Analysis of Compromise of Career of University Students  

Ahn, Jae Hee (Division of Education, HongIk University)
Park, Sung Hee (Graduate School of Education, Gachon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.3, 2019 , pp. 35-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study analyzed by what factors university students were impacted in the compromise of career. 213 students who enrolled in 4-year universities were divided by demographic variables and psychological variables. The results showed followings. Firstly, the interests are the first factor and then social status and sex types followed regardless of variables. Secondly, at the based on the difference of groups science major student took the sex types as the first meanwhile, humanities and art & sports major students took the interests as the first. Lastly, there were statistical differences among groups at the sex types and social status with role orientation. This study can provide differentiated and individualized career development strategies regarding group types of career role orientation.
Keywords
Compromise of career; Sex-role identity; Role-orientation; Demographic variables; University students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 E. H. Kim & B. W. Kim. (2010). A Study on the Recognition of Career Barriers and Compromise Process by Career Role Orientation, Korea Journal of Counseling, 11(4), 1451-1468.   DOI
2 J. R. Joeng & K. H. Lee. (2007). The Differences of Preference in the Career Compromise Processes Depending on Gender and Sex-role Stereotype. Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 12(2), 161-174.
3 K. S. Park. (2008). Korean Male College Students' Gender Roles and Career Compromise. Ph.D Dissertation,, Department of Education The Graduate School of Dankook University.
4 D. E. Super. (1957). The Psychology of Careers; An Introduction to Vocational Development, New York : Harper & Brothers. (Vol. 195).
5 S. Y. Lee. (2004). Career Awareness of Highly Educationed Women at the Stage of Job Implementation Phases. The Korean Sociological Association 2004. 6, 571-573.
6 S. L. Bem & S. A. Lewis. (1975). Sex Role Adaptability: One Consequence of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 634-643.   DOI
7 J. K. Chung. (1990). Korean Sex Role Inventory (KSRI). The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 5(1), 82-92.
8 K. I. Khoe, S. H. Hong & W. S. Sul. (2018). Study on improvement policy through diagnosis and analysis of success cases of industry-academy internships. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(5), 205-210.   DOI
9 J. H. Ahn & S. H. Park. (2016). A Study on the Difference of Career Barriers, Career Attitude Maturity, and Career Competencies based on Gender, Grade, and Fields of Major of Undergraduate students in the age of Convergence. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 14(8), 69-80.
10 W. J. Jang. (2018). The Relationship between the Perceived Career Barriers on the Career Compromise : Focused on the Moderate Effect on the Self-Efficacy. Journal of Convergence Society, 9(11), 325-331.
11 K. H. Lee & M. R. Cho. (2003). Gender Differences in the Preference Level of Career Compromise of High School Students. Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 8(3), 1-12.
12 L. S. Gottfredson. (1981). Circumscription and Compromise: A Developmental Theory of Occupational Aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545-579.   DOI
13 S. A. Leun & B. S. Plake. (1990). A Choice Dilemma Approach for Examining the Relative Importance of Sex Type and Prestige Preferences in the Process of Career Choice Compromise. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(4), 399-406.   DOI
14 L. S. Gottfredson. (2002). Gottfredson's Theory of Circumscription, Compromise, and Self-Creation. Career Choice and Development, 4, 85-148.
15 L. S. Gottfredson. (1996). Gottfredson's Theory of Circumscription and Compromise In Brown. D., Brooks, L. & Associates (eds.) Career Choice and Development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
16 M. Y. Kim & H. J. Bang. (2005). Gender and Birth Order Differences in the Preference Level of Career Compromise. Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 10(2), 173-188.
17 P. A. Holt. (1989). Differential Effect of Status and Interest in the Process of Compromise, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(1), 42-47.   DOI
18 S. A. Leung. (1993). Circumscription and Compromise: A Replication Study with Asian Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(2), 188-193.   DOI
19 B. Hesketh, S. Elmslie & W. Kaldor. (1990). Career Compromise: An Alternative Account to Gottfredson's Theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(1), 49-56.   DOI
20 C. A. Blanchard & J. W. Lichtenberg. (2003). Compromise in Career Decision Making: A Test of Gottfredson's Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 250-271.   DOI
21 S. H. Kim. (2006). Role Orientation and Compromising Situations in Women's Career Choice: Effects on the Preference for Compromising Factors. Graduate School of Ajou University.
22 Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute. (2018). 2017 Employment Statistics for Graduates of Higher Education Institutions, https://www.gov.kr/portal/ntnadmNews/1723270
23 C. K. Chae. (2016). Analysis of Statistics on College Graduates Finding Major-related Jobs. KRIVET Issue Brief, 91, 1-4.
24 Korean Educational Development Institute (2015). Higher education.employment statistics.
25 J. H. Kim. (2009), The Difference of Compromise Process According to Various Situations in Making Career Decision. Ph. D Dissertations, Seoul University.
26 N. B. Taylor & R. G. Pryor. (1985). Exploring the Process of Compromise in Career Decision Making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27(2), 171-190.   DOI
27 M. H. Hwang. (2002). The Compromise Process in Decision Making of Postsecondary Education in Korea. Doctoral Dissortation, Graduate school of Seoul National University.
28 D. E. Sandberg. A. A. Ehrhardt, S. E. Ince & H. F. Meyer-Bahlburg. (1991). Gender Differences in Children's and Adolescents' Career Aspirations: A Follow-up Study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6(3), 371-386.   DOI
29 S. A. Leung & L. W. Harmon. (1990). Individual and Sex Differences in the Zone of Acceptable Alternatives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(2), 153-159.   DOI
30 C. Gilligan. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard.
31 S. D. Crozier. (1999). Women's Career Development in a "Relational Context". International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 21(3), 231-247   DOI
32 D. E. Sandberg, A. A. Ehrhardt, S. E. Ince, & H. F. Meyer-Bahlburg. (1991). Gender Differences in Children's and Adolescents' Career Aspirations: A Follow-up study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6(3), 371-386.   DOI
33 L. Forrest & N. Mikolaitis. (1986). The Relational Component of Identity: An Expansion of Career Development Theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 35(2), 76-88.   DOI
34 J. Corder & C. W. Stephan. (1984). Females' Combination of Work and Family Roles: Adolescents' Aspirations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(2), 391-402.   DOI