Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.009

An Evaluation Study on the Effectiveness of National Cyber Crime Prevention Education Program: Based on the CIPP Model  

Jeong, Hwan-su (Korean National Police Agency Cyber Bureau)
Woo, You-ran (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
Lee, Choong C. (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.2, 2019 , pp. 9-18 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigates the factors affecting the educational satisfaction and the transfer of learning of cyber crime prevention education students in order to confirm the effectiveness of the current education. Based on the CIPP model, we confirmed whether the level of social demand and the level of knowledge in the context evaluation, recency of subjects in the input evaluation and interaction in the process evaluation affect the educational satisfaction and the transfer of learning of the students by conducting the survey for the students. As a result of analysis, it was proved that the level of knowledge, recency of subjects and interaction had a significant relationship with the educational satisfaction and recency of subjects, interaction and educational satisfaction significantly affect transfer of learning. Based on the findings, this study provides a few constructive suggestions to improve the effectiveness of the cyber crime prevention education program.
Keywords
Cyber crime; Cyber crime prevention education; CIPP evaluation model; Transfer of learning; Educational satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 D. S. Wall. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age (Vol. 4) Cambridge : Polity Press.
2 W. Choung. (2007). Current Situation and Criminal Subject of Cybercrime. Korean Criminological Review, 18(3), 1499-1535.
3 M. Yar. (2005). The Novelty of 'Cybercrime' An Assessment in Light of Routine Activity Theory. European Journal of Criminology, 2(4), 407-427.   DOI
4 S. Gordon. & R. Ford. (2006). On the definition and classification of cybercrime. Journal in Computer Virology, 2(1), 13-20.   DOI
5 S. M. Ryu & Y. S. Song. (2012). A Study on Satisfaction of New Employee Training Program Applying CIPP Evaluation Model Focusing on H Corporation. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 14(1), 47-71.
6 D. Stufflebeam & A. Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco : Wiley.
7 I. W. Park. & M. J. Hannafin. (1993). Empirically -based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 63-85.   DOI
8 S. J. Shin & I. Ryu. (2008). A Study on Structural Relationships between Information Service Quality and Performance. Journal of the Korea society of computer and information, 13(6), 301-314.
9 K. Swan. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance education, 22(2), 306-331.   DOI
10 D. R. Shin, M. S. Jung & S. H. Lee. (2009). Factors Influencing Learner Awareness and Learning Satisfaction in Elementary Native Language Video Instruction. Education Research, 47(4), 119-143.
11 Y. H. Yoon, D. S. Na & J. T. Jung. (2015). An empirical study for the relations between consultant's expertise and consulting knowledge transfer : Focused on FTA consulting. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(11), 119-132.   DOI
12 D. E. Lee. (2018). Domestic and Foreign Cyber Threat Trends - Past, present and future strategies of cyber attack. Korea Multimedia Journal, 22(2), 13-18.
13 Y. H. Kim. & Y. K. Hwang. (2007). A Study on Crime-responding system in Cyber-space. Journal of Korean Public Police and Security Studies, 4(1), 39-62.
14 P. Grabosky. (2007). Requirements of prosecution services to deal with cyber crime. Crime, law and social change, 47(4-5), 201-223.   DOI
15 Y. M. Jee. (2018). Criminal Law Policy on Cybercrimes. Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law, 19(4), 431-456.   DOI
16 D. Robinson & J. Robinson. (1989). Training for impact. Training & Development Journal, 43(8), 34-43.
17 E. Gagne, C. Yekovich & F. Yekovich. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school subjects New York: HarperCollins.
18 E. Holton III, R. Bates, D. Seyle & M. Carvalho. (1997). Toward construct validation of a transfer climate instrument. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(2), 95-113.   DOI
19 E. H. Yang. & J. S. Jung. (2006). In search of Diagnostic Tools for Learning Transfer. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 8(2), 101-122.
20 Y. H. Park. (2011). Interventions to Facilitate Transfer of Learning: Based on Stakeholders' Roles and Time Frames. International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 14(1), 151-185.
21 D. H. Lim. & S. Johnson. (2002). Trainee perceptions of factors that influence learning transfer. International journal of training and development, 6(1), 36-48.   DOI
22 B. C. Lee, H. J. Yoon & G. S. Yoon. (2012). Factors Influencing Transfer of Learning and Reaction, Learning, Transfer of Learning in R&D Human Resources Training. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 14(2), 65-98.
23 G. M. Bae & Y. H. Park. (2016). A Study on the Diagnosis and Improvement of Educational Operation Status of Occupational Safety and Health Job Training Institutions Based on CIPP Model. Corporate Education and Talent Research, 18(1), 57-84.
24 C. Kirwan & D. Birchall. (2006). Transfer of learning from management development programmes: Testing the Holton model. International journal of training and development, 10(4), 252-268.   DOI
25 K. S. Jung & K. J. Kim. (2006). Learning Effectiveness and Transition Factors on e-Learning. The Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 1-29.   DOI
26 J. Y. Joo, E. K. Kim, S. N. Kim & S. Y. Park. (2009). Relationships among Learners' Satisfaction, Academic Achievement and Learning Transfer in the Corporate Cyber Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(1), 23-43.
27 J. Anderson & D. Gerbing (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.   DOI
28 H. S. Han & J. K. Lee. (2006). A Study on the Impact of Quality Factors on the Easy of use and Usefulness of Mobile Games. Journal of Digital Convergence, 4(2), 87-96.
29 J. Steiger. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate behavioral research, 25(2), 173-180.   DOI
30 D. Kirkpatrick. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and development journal, 33(6), 78-92.
31 J. M. Lee & G. J. Lee. (2018). A Study on the Factors Associated with Students' Satisfaction with Graduate Education. The Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 229-251.   DOI
32 J. Y. Lee. (2004). A Study on the Selection of Content Delivery Strategies to Improve Learner Satisfaction and Performanced of e-Learning Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 185-214.   DOI
33 J. Hair, R. Anderson, R. Tatham & W. Black. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
34 K. R. Kim, N. Y. Kwak & C. C. Lee. (2018). Study on Factors Affecting Turnover Intention of Digital evidence analyst : Focus on Job stress, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(8), 1-10.   DOI
35 C. Fornell & D. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.   DOI
36 D. Gefen, D. Straub & M. Boudreau. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7.
37 W. S. Seo, J. M. Kim & Y. W. Jeon. (2007). Evaluation of Environmental Education of Public Servants in NIERD based on CIPP Model. [Evaluation of Environmental Education of Public Servants in NIERD based on CIPP Model. Korea Environmental Education Association, 20(1), 106-117.
38 J. S. Cho., Y. M. Jeon & K. R. Kim. (2016). A Study on the effect of LMS on the self-regulated learning competency and learning satisfaction in Higher Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 22(1), 55-84.   DOI
39 D. Stufflebeam. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Ohio : Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Evaluation Center.
40 H. Y. Park. (2012). Evaluation of Airline Service Education Using the CIPP Model -focus on factors which influenced satisfaction and recommendation of the training program. Journal of Korean Contens Association, 12(10), 510-523.
41 D. Stufflebeam, G. Madaus & T. Kellaghan. (2000). Evaluation models. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publiser.
42 J. M. Kim. (2006). Innovative Strategies on Fanner Education for the Agricultural and Rural Development. Journal of Korean Agricultural Education, 38(3), 75-111.