Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.1.169

Strategy for Building Smart City as a Platform of the 4th Industrial Revolution  

Park, Young Jae (Department of Management Information Systems, Tongmyong University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.17, no.1, 2019 , pp. 169-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
The city is experiencing various problems such as traffic congestion, environmental pollution, urban crime, and faces the limit of growth. Recently, various attempts to build a Smart City have been spreading around the world, in order to solve these problems. Smart City is attracting attention as the core platform of the future city with the $4^{th}$ industrial revolution. However, various definitions of smart city are mixed, and the methods and strategies for implementing smart city are changing or evolving due to the development of technology and the experience during that time. This study summarizes the definition of various smart city through literature review and suggests smart city building strategy that enables sustainable growth of cities as a platform of the $4^{th}$ industrial revolution era.
Keywords
Convergence; Smart City; Platform; Building Strategy; Living Lab; 4th Industrial Revolution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 The white house. (2015. 9. 14). Fact sheet: Administration Announces new "Smart Cities" Initiative to help communities tackle local challenges and improve city services, Press release.
2 K. Gay. (2016). US DOT Smart City Challenge. 16th Korea-US Roads Workshop. Seoul.
3 IBM. (2010). Smarter Cities Challenge. https://www.smartercitieschallenge.org.
4 CISCO. (2009). Smart+ Connected Communities: Changing a City, a Country, the World. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/docs/scc/09CS2326_SCC_BrochureForWest_r3_112409.pdf.
5 Y. J. Yoon, A. S. Kim, K. J. Joo, Y. J. Kim & D. G. Hwang. (2018). 4th Industrial Revolution and smart city 4.0, Seoul : Korea Creative Economy Research Network.
6 National Information Society Agency. (2018). Smart City by Smart Citizen. Deagu : National Information Society Agency.
7 J. Y, Lee & S. W. Lee. (2017). Indicator-Based Diagnosis for Smart City's Sustainability. National Land Policy Brief, 1-7.
8 G. Hwang. (2018). Smart City. KISTEP Technical Briefings. 12. Seoul : Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.
9 Technology Strategy Board. (2013). Solutions for Cities: An analysis of the feasibility studies from the Future Cities Demonstrator Programme. Swindon : Technology Strategy Board, ARUP.
10 4th Industrial Revolution Commission. (2018). Smart city promotion strategy for city innovation and future growth engine. Seoul : 4th Industrial Revolution Commission.
11 G. Shin, S. Oh, W. G. Jang, S. W. Jang, S. T. Hong & H. S. Kim. (2018). A study on Integrated Operation Platform for Smart City. Proceedings of Symposium of the Korean Institute of communications and Information Sciences. (pp. 550-551). Seoul : The Korean Institute of communications and Information Sciences.
12 V. Brocke, A. Simons, B. Niehaves, R. Plattfaut & A. Cleven. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process, Proceedings of ECIS 17th European Conference on Information Systems. (pp. 2-13).
13 S. M. Jung, J. H. Lee & J. H. Kim. (2017). IoT-based Global Smart City Technology Development Trend. The Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences, 34(9), 18-23.
14 National Information Society Agency. (2013. December). Smart City Overseas Trend and Implications. IT & Future Strategy, 11, 1-23.
15 Deloitte. (2017). Forces of change: Smart cities. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/4421_Forces-of-change-Smart-cities/DI_Forces-of-change-Smart-cities.pdf.
16 The Population Division of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (16 May 2018). UN. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
17 J. S. Hwang. (2017). National Strategy Research Projects through Smart City Development Trends and Issues, The Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences, 34(8), 14-18.
18 A. Cocchia. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review In Smart city. (pp. 13-43). Springer, Cham.
19 T. Pardo & T. Nam. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions, Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. (pp. 282-291). New York: ACM.
20 World Economic Forum. (January 2016). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
21 K. Schwab. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. NewPresent Press.
22 J. Pierson & B. Lievens. (2005). Configuring living labs for a 'thick'understanding of innovation. Proceeding of Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference. (pp. 114-127). Redmond : Blackwell Publishing.
23 J. H. Kim. (Aug. 2016). Strategic countermeasures for future social change in the era of the 4th industrial revolution. KISTEP InI, 15, 45-58.
24 M. Eriksson, V. P. Niitamo & S. Kulkki. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation - a European approach. Lulea : Lulea University of Technology.
25 S. S. Intille, K. Larson, E. M. Tapia, J. S. Beaudin, P. Kaushik, J. Nawyn & R. Rockinson. (2006). Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. Pervasive. Computing. (pp. 349-365). Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer. 2006.
26 G. Pasman, P. J. Stappers, P. Hekkert & D. Keyson. (2005). The ID-studiolab 2000-2005. Proceedings of Design Research in The Netherlands. Eindhoven.
27 V. P. Niitamo, S. Kulkki, M. Eriksson & K. A. Hribernik. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks. (pp. 26-28). Milan.
28 A. Folstad. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. Electronic Journal of Virtual Organizations, 10( 5), 99-131.
29 Helsinki. (2006). Helsinki Manifesto. Helsinki. http://elivinglab.org/files/Helsinki_Manifesto_201106.pdf
30 D. Schuurman, B. Lievens, L. De Marez & P. Ballon. (2012). Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: a panel-centered living lab-approach. Proceedings of Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET). (pp. 2046-2054). Vancouver : IEEE.
31 B. Dutilleul, F. A. Birrer & W. Mensink. (2010). Unpacking European living labs: analyzing innovation's social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 60-85.
32 D. Schuurman. (2015). Bridging the gap between open and user innovation? Exploring the value of living labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation. Doctoral Dissertation, Ghent University. Vancouver.
33 P. Ballon & D. Schuurman. (2015). Living labs: concepts, tools and cases. info, 17(4), 1-11.
34 J. Y. Seong & Y. N. Lee. (2018). Case Analysis and Challenges on Smart City Living Lab. Trends and Issues, 47, 1-37
35 Navigant Research. (September 2016). Smart Cities: Smart Technologies and Infrastructure for Energy, Water, Mobility, Buildings, and Government: Global Market Analysis and Forecasts. Navigant Research. https://www.navigantresearch.com/reports/smart-cities.
36 Marketsandmarkets. (July 2017). Smart Cities Market by Focus Areas, Transportation (Types, Solutions, Services), Utilities (Types, Solutions, Services), Buildings (Types, Solutions, Services), Citizen Services (Types), and Region - Global Forecast to 2022. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4332800/smart-cities-market-by-focus-areas
37 B. Ria. (2000). Bilbao Culture as a City Project. Bilbao Ria.
38 A. S. City. (2009). Amsterdam smart city. Proceedings of PICNIC. Amsterdam.