Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.5.477

A Study on the Construct Measurement of Support Needs for People with Intellectual Disabilities  

Yoon, Jeayoung (Sahmyook University)
Park, Chano (Sahmyook University)
Park, Sangwon (Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.16, no.5, 2018 , pp. 477-485 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to find construction factors of assessing the support needs of people with intellectual disabilities. For this purpose, 19 social welfare activists of the disabled having experiences in individual support services interviewed 196 persons with intellectual disabilities and based on the interview results, confirmatory factor analysis has been conducted. The study has found a construct of 6 areas and 20 items to assess the support needs. Compared to ICF and SIS-A, it shows the health care area has been emphasized while community life, social life and civic life have decreased. The study discusses the possibility of using the simple scale in the early stage of introduction of individual support services for people with intellectual disabilities in South Korea and the normative scores are needed to be produced by additional larger scale survey studies in the future.
Keywords
Intellectual Disabilities; Support; Support Needs; Measurement; Individualized Support;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D. W. Han & M. C. Kang. (2013). Study on smart contents development directions for children with autistic disorder to enhance adaptive behavior. The journal of Digital Policy & Management, 11(10), 123-131
2 Drew, C. J. & Hardman, M. L. (2007). Intellectual disabilities across the lifespan. Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic.
3 W. P. Kim. (2008). Structural equation model analysis using Amos. Seoul: Society and Statistics.
4 Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C. & Stancliffe, R. J. (2014). I‐CAN: The Classification and Prediction of Support Needs. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(2), 97-111.   DOI
5 Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C. & Stancliffe, R. J. (2011). Intelligence is as intelligence does: Can additional support needs replace disability?. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(4), 258-262.   DOI
6 M. Lombardi & L. Croce. (2016). Aligning supports planning within a Quality-of-Life Outcomes Framework. in Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability. edited by R. L. Schalock and K. D. Keith, 81-92.
7 Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E. & Gomez, S. C. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 47(2), 135-146.   DOI
8 Power, A., Lord, J. E., & DeFranco, A. S. (2013). Active citizenship and disability: Implementing the personalisation of support. Cambridge University Press.
9 Thompson, J. R. Wehmeyer M. L., Hughes C., Shogren K. A., Seo H., Little T. D., Schalock R. L., et al. (2016). Support Intensity Scale-Children's Version User's Manual. Washington, DC: AAIDD.
10 World Health Organization(WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health(ICF). Geneva, Switzerland.
11 Seoul Independent Living Center. (2017). Objective conditions for successful human-centered support: Key success indicators that capture quality of service. Seoul, Korea.
12 Smull M. W., and SandersonH. 2005. Essential Lifestyle Planning for Everyone. The Learning Community. Annapolis: MD.
13 Rimmerman, A. (2017). Disability and Community Living Policies. Cambridge University Press.
14 Arnold, S. R., Riches, V. C., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2015). Does a Measure of Support Needs Predict Funding Need Better Than a Measure of Adaptive and Maladaptive Behavior?. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 120(5), 375-394.   DOI
15 H. S. Lee. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS 6.0. Seoul : BOBMUNSA.
16 https://www.i-can.org.au/
17 J. Y. Yoon & G. C. Jeon. (2016). Conceptualizing the Support Needs of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Disability and Welfare, 16(33), 123-148.
18 Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M. & Martin, L. L. (2012). Designing and managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. Sage Publications.
19 O'Brien, J., Pearpoint J. & Kahn L. (2010). The PATH & MAPS Handbook: Person-centered Ways to Build Community. Inclusion Press. Toronto: Canada.
20 Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M. & Shogren, K. A. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 444 North Capitol Street NW Suite 846, Washington, DC 20001.
21 H. M. Han, J. S. Sin, G. B. Yoon. (2011). Supports Intensity Scale-User's Manual. Seoul: Sigmapress Publishing Co. ISBN: 9788958329749(8958329742)
22 Richies, V. C., Parmenter, T. R., Llewellyn, G., Hindmarsh, G. & Chan, J. (2009). I-CAN: A new instrument to Classify Support Needs for People with Disability: Part I. Journal of Applied Research in intellectual disability, 22, 326-339.   DOI
23 Wile, D. E. (2014). Why doers do-part 1: Internal elements of human performance. Performance Improvement, 53(2), 14-20.   DOI
24 Wile, D. E. (2014b). Why doers do-Part 2: External-tangible elements of human performance. Performance Improvement, 53(3), 5-13.   DOI
25 Wile, D. E. (2014c). Why Doers Do-Part 3: External‐ Intangible Elements of Human Performance. Performance Improvement, 53(4), 6-15.   DOI
26 support. (n.d). Dictionalry.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/support