Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.6.225

Limitations of neurobiological approach convergent to neuropsychiatry: DCD and two visual systems theory  

Lee, Young-Lim (Dept. of Psychology, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.13, no.6, 2015 , pp. 225-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
Neurobiological approach helps to resolve the mind-body dualism and develop new assessment and treatment approaches in psychiatry. However, it could be a problem to place too much emphasis on certain aspects of neurobiology, specifically structural neuroanatomy, because of the complexity or comorbidity of neuropsychiatric disorders. Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), for instance, is generally related to problems in motor skills and this movement disability is often related to perception. One account, two visual systems theory, relied on functional distinction in brain; ventral stream is responsible for visual recognition, and dorsal stream is responsible for the guidance of actions. However, Studies are now showing that shape perception is relevant to visually guided action, such as reaching-to-grasp an object. In this article, I reviewed fundamental findings of two-visual system theory and suggested problems of visually guided action to consider what shape perception implies for the two visual systems. Questions raised highlight possible limitations of adopting a structural neuroanatomical approach to account for perception and action effects, and by extent related psychiatric conditions such as DCD. In conclusion, neurobiological approach converging to neuropsychiatry, while useful, would be limited if it focuses too much on anatomical distinction.
Keywords
Convergence; neuroanatomy; neurobiology; neuropsychiatry; DCD; ventral stream; dorsal stream;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. -T. Prenin, and A. Vighetto, Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, Vol. 111, pp. 643-674, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 M. A. Goodale, J. P. Meenan, H. H. Bulthoff, D. A. Nicolle, K. J. Murphy, and C. I. Racicot, Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, Vol. 4, pp. 604-610, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 L. S. Jakobson, Y. M. Archibald, D. P. Carey, and M. A. Goodale, A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 29, pp. 803-809, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 M. Jeannerod, J. Decety, and F. Michel, Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 32, pp. 369-380, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 M. A. Goodale, A. D. Milner, L. S. Jakobson, and D. P. Carey, A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them, Nature, Vol. 349, pp. 154-156, 1991.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Y. E. Cohen, and R. A. Andersen, A common reference frame fro movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 553-562, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 L H. Snyder, A. P. Batista, and R. A. Andersen, Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, Vol. 386, pp. 167-170, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 A. Murata, V. Gallese, M. Kaseda, H. Sakata, Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 75, pp. 2180-2186, 1996.   DOI
9 J. D. Connolly, R. A. Andersen, and M. A. Goodale, fMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region'in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 153, pp. 140-145, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 J. C. Culham, S. L. D. Dnackert, J. F. X. DeSouza, J. S. Gati, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 153, pp. 180-189, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 T. W. James, G. K. Humphrey, J. S. Gati, P. Servos, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 40, pp. 1706-1714, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 M. Bar, R. B. H. Tootell, D. L. Schacter, D. N. Greve, B. Fischl, J. D. Mendola, B. R. Rosen, and A. M. Dale, Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron, Vol. 29, pp. 529-535, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 K. Grill-Spector, T. Kushnir, T. Hendler, R. Malach, The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 837-843, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 M. A. Goodale, L. S. Jakobson, and P. Servos, The visual pathways mediating perception and prehension. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, and J. R. Flanagan(Eds.), Hand and Brain: The neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements (pp. 15-31). San Diego CA: Academic Press Inc, 1996.
15 L. Pisella, H. Grea, C. Tilikete, A. Vighetto, M. Desmurget, G. Rode, D. Boisson, and Y. Rossetti, An 'automatic pilot'for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 3, pp. 729-736, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 A. D. Milner, H. C. Dijkerman, and D. P. Carey, Visuospatial processing in a pure case of visual-form agnosia. In N. Burgess, K. J. Jeffery, and J. O'keefe (Eds.), The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition (pp. 443-466). Oxford University Press, 1999.
17 H. van Doorn, J. van der Kamp, and G. J. P. Savelsbergh, Grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion: The contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 45, pp. 1939-1947, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 M. A. Goodale, L. S. Jakobson, and J. M. Keillor, Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movement. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 32, pp. 1159-1178, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 M. A. Goodale, and A. D. Milner, Plans for action. Behavioral Brain Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 37-40, 2004.
20 A. D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 46, pp. 774-785, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 D. P. Carey, M. Harvey, and A. D. Milner, Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 34, pp. 329-337, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 E. A. Wickelgren, D. S. McConnell, and G. P. Bingham, Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 62, pp. 1051-1059, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 G. P. Bingham, and M. Lind, Large perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for accurate perception of metric shape. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 70, pp. 524-540, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Y. Lee, and G. P. Bingham, Large perspective changes (${\geq}45^{\circ}$) yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp, and it persists after the optic flow has stopped! Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 204, pp. 559-573, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 R. F. de Olivia, and J. P. Wann, Integration of dynamic information for visuomotor control in young adults with developmental coordination disorder. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 205, pp. 387-394, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 M. Lind, Y. Lee, J. Mazanowski, G. K. Kountouriotis, and G. P.Bingham, Affine operations plus symmetry yield perception of metric shape with large perspective changes (${\geq}45^{\circ}$): Data and model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 40, pp. 83-93, 2014.   DOI
27 J. F. Norman, H. F. Norman, A. M. Clayton, J. Lianekhammy, and G. Zielke, The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 66, pp. 342-351, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 A. Amedi, R. Malach, T. Hendler, S. Peled, and E. Zohary, Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 4, pp. 324-330, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 M. Kashiwagi, S. Iwaki, Y. Narumi, H. Tamai, and S. Suzuki, Parietal dysfunction in developmental coordination disorder: A functional MRI study. Neuroreport, Vol. 20, pp. 1319-1324, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 J. G. Zwicker, C. Missiuna, S. R. Harris, and L. A. Boyd, Brain activation associated with motor skill practice in children with developmental coordination disorder: An fMRI study. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, Vol. 29, pp. 145-152, 2011.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 C. Lefebvre, and G. Reid, Prediction in ball catching by children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 299-315, 1998.   DOI
32 M. A. Dar, R. A. Wani, and Y. H. Rather, An anti-thought about neurobiological approach in psychiatry. Journal of Pscyhiatry, Vol. 18, pp. 183, 2015. doi:10.4172/1994-8220.1000183
33 J. P. Wann, M. Mon-Williams, and K. Rushton, Postural control and co-ordination disorders: The swinging room revisited. Human Movement Science, Vol. 17, pp. 491-514, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 J. Raese, The pernicious effect of mind/body dualism in psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 18, pp. 219, 2015. doi: 10.4172/1994-8220.1000219
35 S. C. Yudofsky, Neuropsychiatry and the Future of Psychiatry and Neurology. Ameircan Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, pp. 1261-1264, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 J. B. Martin, The integration of neurology, psychiatry, and neuroscience in the 21stcentury. Ameircan Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 159, pp. 695-704, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 B. H. Price, R. D. Adams, and J. T. Coyle, Neurology and psychiatry: Closing the great divide. Neurology, Vol. 54, pp. 8-14, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 K. S. Kendler, Toward a Philosophical Structure for Psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, pp. 433-440, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 H. William, and M. Woollacott, Characteristics of neuromuscular responses underlying posture control in clumsy children. Motor Development; Research and Reviews, Vol. 1, pp. 8-23, 1997.
40 B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman, A. S. Niemeijer, and G. P. Van Galen, Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnoses as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability. Human Movement Science, Vol. 20, pp. 161-182, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 M. Mon-Williams, J. P. Wann, and E. Pascal, Visual-proprioceptive mapping in developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vol. 41, pp. 247-254, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 H. Sigmundsson, Inter-modal matching and bi-manual co-ordination in children with hand-eye co-ordination problems. Nordisk Fysioterapi, Vol. 3, pp. 55-64, 1999.
43 S. Parush, A. Yochman, D. Cohen, and E. Gershon, Relation of visual perception and visual-motor integration for clumsy children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 86, pp. 291-295, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 A. J. Raynor, Strength, power, and coactivation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vol. 43, pp. 676-684, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 A. D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, The visual brain in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
46 L. G. Ungerleider, and M. Mishkin, Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and R. J. W. Mansfield(Eds.). Analysis of Visual Behavior (pp. 549-586). MIT Press Cambridge MA, 1982.
47 M. A. Goodale, and A. D. Milner, Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, Vol. 15, pp. 20-25, 2002.
48 J. Norman, Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral Brain Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 73-144, 2002.