Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.4.145

Analyis of the Structure and Impact of SCM Advanced Planning System : Lessons from POSCO Case  

No, Gyeong Ho (POSCO)
Park, Seong Taek (Dept. of Business, Chungbuk National University)
Kim, Tae Ung (Dept. of Business, SungKyunKwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.12, no.4, 2014 , pp. 145-155 More about this Journal
Abstract
POSCO has been chosen as the most competitive steelmaker in the world, for the 4th year in a row. It's potentials and key success points lay at technology innovation as well as effective partnerships with suppliers and customers. Partnership with suppliers is based upon the effective supply chain management. While ERP system supports the standard business work flows, the biggest impact on business performance is created by exceptions and variability. A SCM Advanced Planning System reduces the amount of exceptional situations, helping to keep business in a standard mode of operation. A case summary on SCM Advanced Planning System of POSCO as well as its impact on firm performances is presented. As a supplement to this case study, we also investigate the employees' perceived level of SCM-related factors, including information sharing, collaboration, incentive system for suppliers and their impacts on SCM performances. As a conclusion, the practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
SCM; Advanced Planning System; information sharing; collaboration; steelmaker;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lee, H., So, K., Tang, C. "The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain," Management Science 46 (5), pp. 626-643, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Brunn, P., Mefford, R.N. "Lean production and the Internet," International Journal of Production Economics, 89(3), pp. 247-260, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kearns, G.S., Lederer, A.L. "A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: how knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage," Decision Sciences, 34(1), pp. 1-29, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 McAfee, A. "The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: an empirical investigation", Production and Operations Management, 11(1), pp. 33-53, 2002.
5 Han, S.-L., Wilson, D. P., and Dant, S. P. "Buyer-Supplier Relationships Today," Industrial Marketing Management, 22(4), pp. 331-338, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.K. "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer," Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp. 146-165, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Stadtler, H & C. Kilger. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning(4th ed.), Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
8 http://globalblog.posco.com.
9 Changbong Kim and Youngjin Bae. "An Empirical Study on Performance of SCM Construction by Domestic Manufacturers", The e-business studies, 11(1), pp. 25-44, 2010.
10 Smyth, H., M. Gustafsson, E. Ganskau. "The value of trust in project business," International Journal of Project Management, 28, pp. 117-129, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Smyth, H., Gustafsson, M., Ganskau, E.. "The value of trust in project business," International Journal of Project Management, 28, pp. 117-129, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sanders, R. "Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer-suppler coordination and performance," Journal of Operations Management, 26, pp. 349-367, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Tae Ung Kim.. "An Exploratory Study on Information Sharing, Incentives and Collaboration in Project-based Supply Chain," Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 23(1), pp. 71-87, 2012.
14 Eriksson P.E. "Procurement effects on competition in client-contractor relationships," Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 134(2), pp. 103-111, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Henseler, J., Chin, W. "A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, in: Structural Equation Modeling", A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), pp. 82-109, 2010.
16 Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S.,(1997). "Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect," Management Science 43 (4), pp. 546-558.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Gavirneni, S., Kapuscinski, R., Tayur, S. "Value of information of capacitated supply chains," Management Science 45(1), pp. 16-24, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Tae Ung Kim. Production and Operations Management, Shinyoungsa, Seoul, 2013.
19 Stevens, G.C. "Integrating the supply chain," International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 19(8), pp. 3-8, 1989.
20 Power, D. "Supply chain management integration and implementation : a literature review," Supply Chain Management, 10(3), pp. 252-263, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Zhao, X., Flynn, B.B., Roth, A.V. "Decision sciences research in China : a critical review and research agenda : foundations and overview," Decision Sciences, 37(4), pp. 451-496, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Kotzab, H., C. Teller, D.B. Grant, L. Sparks. "Antecedents for the adoption and execution of supply chain management," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), pp. 231-245, 2011.   DOI
23 Shih, S.C., S. Hsu, Z. Zhu, Balasubramanian, S.K. "Knowledge sharing-A key role in the downstream supply chain," Information & Management, Available online 16, January 2012.
24 Martinsuo, M. & T. Aholab. "Supplier integration in complex delivery projects: Comparison between different buyer-supplier relationships," International Journal of Project Management 28, pp.107-116, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Zhou, H. and W.C. Benton. "Supply chain practice and information sharing," Journal of Operations Management, 25, pp. 1348-1365, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kearns, G.S. and A.L. Lederer. "A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: how knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage," Decision Sciences, 34(1), pp. 1-29, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn