Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2014.12.1.71

A Study on Legislative Conflict for Se -Jong City  

Kim, Yong-Chul (Dept. of Public Administration, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.12, no.1, 2014 , pp. 71-80 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study focus on the legislative conflict for Se-Jong City In case of this paper, the law of administration agency centered is based on the conflict of legislative conflict present government at that time suggested the amendment of that legal status because of so many inefficiency and negative effects regardless of opponent asserts. Here there were a deep various political interests fundamentally both of sides. Legislative conflict here affects the regional conflict among the benefits and indirect benefits or nothing in any area. As the result, political interest deeply which was connected in politics influenced the big national issues, not to amend as a result government failure will be come.
Keywords
legislative conflict; legislative failure; policy failure; rent-seeking behavior; public conflict;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kang Young Jin. The Manual for Conflict Solution, Sung Gong Hoi Univ. NGO Center,2000
2 Ko Kyung Hun. Policy Analysis of Local Government, PhD.Dissertation of Korea Univ., 2000
3 The Office of Prime Minister. Under of Sejong City Problems., 2010a
4 The Office of Prime Minister. The Development of Sejong City, 2010b
5 Kim Dong Ju. What is the balanced Development? The misunderstanding and Practices, Local Autonamy, Vol. 222. The Foundation of Future Korea. pp.54-55.2007.
6 Kim Du Hwan. Deliberate Citizen Participation in Social Conflict and Solving Problems, Civil Society and NGO, Vol.3, No.1, 2005.
7 Kim Suk Tae. Rentseeking for Pereference Facilities and Rent Restoration, The Journal of Korean Administration Review, Vol.37 No.1, 2003.
8 Kim Jung Whan. An Analysis for New Administration City, The Journal of Policy Science, Vol., 10, No.4..p.238. 2007.
9 Kim Yun Guan .A Study on Government Success and Failure in Public Choice, The Journal of KIPA Reports, Vol.13, p.39. 2010
10 Lee Hyun Gook,. The Basis of Public Choice, The Proceeding of The Association for Korean Administration, Summer, p.11, 2010.
11 Jung Gu Ho. Consensus Approach for Policy Conflict Solving, The Journal for Korean Policy Science, Vol.16,No.2.pp.95-96,2007
12 Jung Ju Yong. Election Agenda and Policy Conflict, The Journal for Korean Policy Science, Vol., 20, No.p.341., 2011.
13 The Institute for Korean Administration). The Admlnistration Efficiency for Dissemination Movement of Government Centeral Agencies., 2009.
14 Andeweg R.B. and Lia Mijzink. Beyond the Two body Image:Relations between Ministers and MPs, Hebert Doring ed. Parliments. and Majority Rule in Western Europe. N.Y.: ST. Martin's Press, 1995.
15 Freeden M. Failure of Political Thinking. Political Studies, Vol.57 .pp.141-142., 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hiller, J. Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedure Justice, Journal of Planning Education and Research., Vol. 18. pp.15-22., 1998.
17 Hogwood B.&P.B.Guy. Policy Dynamics, N.Y.:St.. Martin's Press, 1983.
18 Irgram, H.M.&Dean E.Mann. Why Policies Succeed or Fail, Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publication .p.30. 1980.
19 March, James G. and S.H. A). Organizations, John Wiley&Sons.pp.113-117, 1958
20 McNutt, P.A.). The Economics of Public Choice, Cheltonham, UK.: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. p.173.2002
21 Pincione, G and Teson, F.R.. Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation :A Theory of Discourse Failure. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.2006.
22 Randy T.S,. The Roots of Government Failure, The Independent, Vol.22.No1.pp.7-8, 2012.