1 |
Chakravarti, D., Rajan K, Pallab P, Joydeep Srivastava, Partitioned Presentation of Multicomponent Bundle Prices: Evaluation, Cjoice and Underlying Processing Effects, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.12, No.3, pp.215-229, 2002.
DOI
|
2 |
Drumwright, M. E., A Demonstration of Anomalies in Evaluations of Bundling, Marketing Letters, Vol.3, No.4, pp.311-321, 1992.
|
3 |
Johnson, M. D., Andreas H. and Hans H., Bauer, The Effects of Price Bundling on Consumer Evaluations of Product Offerings," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.16, June, pp.129-142, 1999.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Yadav, M. S., How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp.342-353. 1994
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
William Baumol and E. A. Ide, Variety in Retailing, Vol.3, No.1, pp.93-101, Marketing Science, 1986.
|
6 |
Langer, E J, & Rodin, J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged; A field experiment in an institutional setting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.34, pp.191-198. 1976.
DOI
|
7 |
Jonah Berger, Michaela Draganska and Itamar Simonson, The Influence of Product Variety on on Brand Perception and Choice, Marketing Science, Vol.26, No.4, pp.260-472, 2007.
|
8 |
Lavengar, Sheena S and M. R. Lepper, When Choice is Demotivating; Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.79, December, pp.995-1006, 2000.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Dhar Ravi, Consumer Preference for a no Chioce Option, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, September, pp.215-231. 1997.
|
10 |
Grreenleaf, E. A., R. Lehmann, Reasons for Substential daley in Consumer Decision Making, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, September, pp.196-199, 1995.
|
11 |
Schalensee, Richard, Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling, Journal of Business, Vol. 57, January, pp.211-230, 1984.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Venkatesh, R. and Vijay Mahajan, A Probanilist Approach to Pricing a Bundle of Products and Services, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.30, November, pp.494-508, 1993.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, Prospect Theory; An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrics, Vol.47, No.2, pp.263-291, 1984.
|
14 |
Kahnemen, D., Jack L. K., Richard H. and Thaler, Freeman, R., E., Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking; Entitlements in the Market, American Economic Review, Vol.78, pp.728-741, 1986.
|
15 |
Paul Slovic, The Construction of Preference, American Psychologist, Vol.50, No.5, pp.364-371, 1995.
DOI
|
16 |
Sarah Lichtenstein and Paul Slovic, Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.89, pp.46-55, 1971.
DOI
|
17 |
Gourville, J. T. Pennies‐a‐Day: The Effects of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24, No.4, pp.395-403, 1998.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Hansen Ward and R. K. Martin, Optimal Bundle Pricing, Management Science, Vol.36, February, pp.155-174, 1987.
|
19 |
William Boumol and E. A. Ide, Variety in Retailing, Vol.3, No.1, pp.93-101, Marketing Science, 1986.
|
20 |
Langer, E J, & Rodin, J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged; A field experiment in an institutional setting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.34, pp.191-198, 1976.
DOI
|
21 |
Yadav, M. S., Bundle evaluation in different market segments: The effects of discount framing and buyers' preference heterogeneity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.23, No.3, pp.206-215, 1995.
DOI
|
22 |
Y. W. Ha, H. J. Han, The Influence of Framing of Price Information on the Purchase Intension of a consumer, Korean Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.213, No.2, pp.145-163, 2002.
|
23 |
S. J. Park, The Effect of Pricing Framing of Bundle Product on Attention to a Sunken Cost, Korean Marketing Research, Vol.24, No.3, pp.95-118, 2009
|
24 |
I. P. Levin and G. J. Gaeth, How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, No.3, pp.374-378. 1988.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Mogilner, C., T. Rudnick, and S. S. Iyenga, The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers' Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35, No.2, pp.202-215. 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Bettman, J. R., M. F. Luce, and J. W. Payne, Constructive Consumer Choice Processes, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, No.3, pp.187-217. 1998.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Broniarczyk, S. M., W. D. Hoyer, and L. McAlister, Consumers' Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, No.2, pp.166-176, 1998.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Hoch, S., E. Bradlow, and B. Wansink, The Variety of an Assortment, Marketing Science, Vol.18, No.4, pp.527-546, 1999.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Kahn, B. E. and B. Wansink. The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.30, No.4, pp.519-533, 2004.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Dhar, R., Context and Task Effects on Choice Deferral, Marketing letters, Vol.8, No.1, pp.119-130, 1997.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Luce, M. F., J. R. Bettman, and J. W. Payne, Choice Processing in Emotionally Difficult Decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol.23, March, pp.384-405, 1997.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Tversky, A. and E. Shafir. Choice Under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision, Psychological Science, Vol.3, No.6, pp.358-361, 1992.
DOI
|
33 |
Shafir, E., Choosing versus Rejecting: Why Some Options are both Better and Worse than Others, Memory & Cognition, Vol. 21, pp.546-556, 1993.
DOI
|
34 |
Slovic, P., D. Griffin, and A. Tversky, Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp.5-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1990.
|
35 |
Wedell, D. H., Another Look at Reasons for Choosing and Rejecting, Memory & Cognition, Vol.25, pp.873-887, 1997.
DOI
|
36 |
Higgins, E. T., From Expectancies to World-view: Regulatory Focus in Socialization and Cognition, in J. M. Darley and J. Cooper(Eds.). Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones. (pp. 243-309), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 1998.
|
37 |
Neale, V. L., M. A. Huber, and G. B. Nrothcraft, The Framing of Negotiations: Contextual versus Task Frames, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.39, No.2, pp.228-241, 1987.
DOI
|
38 |
Liberman, N., L. C. Idson, C. J. Camacho, and E. T. Higgins, Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.77, No.6, pp.1135-1145, 1999.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Higgins, E. T., Beyond Pleasure and Pain, American Psychologist, Vol.52, pp.1280-1300, 1997.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Aaker, J. L. and A. Y. Lee, "I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self‐Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.28, No.1, pp.33-49, 2001.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Higgins, E. T., How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making?, Journal of Customer Psychology, Vol.12, No.3, pp.177-191, 2002.
|
42 |
Lee, A. Y. and J. L. Aaker, Bringing the Frame into Focus : The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.86, No.2, pp.205-218, 2004.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Cesario, J., H. Grant and E. T. Higgins, Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer from Feeling Right?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.86, No.3, pp.388-404, 2004.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Higgins, E. T., Value From Regulatory Fit, Psychological Science, Vol.14, No.4, pp.209-213, 2000.
|
45 |
Higgins, E. T., L. C. Idon, A. L. Freitas, S. Spiegel and D. C. Molden, Transfer of Value From Fit, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.84, No.6, pp.1140-1153, 2003.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Avent, T. and E. T. Higgins, How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.43, No.1, pp.1-10, 2006.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Freitas, A. L., N. Liberman, and E. T. Higgins, Regulatory Fit and Resisting Temptation during Goal Pursuit, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.38, No.3, pp.291-298, 2002.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
Higgins, E. T., C. Roney, E. Crowe. and C. Hymes, Ideal versus Ought Predilections for Approach and Avoidance: Distinct Self-Regulatory Systems, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.66, pp.276-286, 1994.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Lpckwood, P., C. H. Jordan, and Z. Kunda, Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.83, No.4, pp.854-864, 2002.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Markman, A. B. and C. M. Brendle, The Influence of Goals on Value and Choice?, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 39, ed. Douglas L. Medin, SanDiego, CA: Academic Press, pp.97-128, 2000.
|
51 |
Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. Theory of games and economic behavior (2d rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press, xviii pp.641. 1947.
|