Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.10.385

Evaluation of Usefulness of an m-DIXON Technique during an Abdomen MRI Examination : A Comparison with an e-THRIVE Technique  

Lee, Bo-Woo (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital)
Park, Myung-Cheol (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital)
Lee, Jin-Hoi (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital)
Kim, Ki-Jin (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Konyang University Hospital)
Bae, Seok-Hwan (Department of Radiological Science, Konyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.12, no.10, 2014 , pp. 385-390 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research is conducted to identify whether an m-DIXON technique which is useful for an abdomen MRI examination compared with an existing e-THRIVE technique is a clinically useful or not. There was evaluated quantitative and qualitative to 84 subjects who had abdomen MRI exam due to their liver disease were conducted during a period from September in 2013 to February in 2014. First of all the quantitative evaluation, the m-DIXON technique's SNR was $90.42{\pm}16.90$ and the e-THRIVE technique was $60.42{\pm}11.54$ and the m-DIXON technique's CNR was $52.38{\pm}22.58$ and the e-THRIVE technique was $46.31{\pm}20.25$. Secondly in the qualitative evaluation, the m-DIXON technique's image quality was $4.06{\pm}0.34$, a artifact was $3.64{\pm}0.22$, and fat suppression was $4.16{\pm}0.15$, the e-THRIVE technique's image quality was $3.14{\pm}0.35$, a artifact was $3.06{\pm}0.38$, fat suppression was $3.14{\pm}0.30$. In conclusion, m-DIXON technique for abdomen MRI examination showed superiority over both SNR as a quantitative anaylsis, CNR and a qualitative analysis.
Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Computed Tomography (CT); liver disease; quantitative evaluation; qualitative evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Tauil B., Koh D. M., Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver, Radiology, Vol. 254 No. 1, pp. 47-66, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 J. S. Park, J. H. Park, T. U. Wang, et al, Comparison between Pre-Contrast and Post-Contrast HASTE T2-Weighted Image in Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced Live MRI. Korean Society of MR Technology, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 75-81, 2011.
3 Seneterre E., Taourel P., Bouvier Y., et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: Ferumoxidesenhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial protography. Radiology, Vol. 200, pp. 785-792, 1996.   DOI
4 Teefey S.A., Hildeboldt C.C., Dehdashti F., et al, Detection of primary hepatic malignancy in liver transplant candidates; Prospective comparision of CT, MRI image, US, and PET. Radiology, Vol. 226, pp. 533-542, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Perkins T. G., Van Tilburg J. L., Herigault G., et al, Preliminary clinical experience with a multiecho 2-Point DIXON sequence at 3T as an efficient alternative, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., Vol 18, pp. 556, 2010.
6 Eggers H., Brendel B., Herigault G., Comparison of DIXON methods for fat suppression in single breath-hold 3D gradient-echo abdominal MRI, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., Vol 17, pp. 2705, 2009.
7 Dixon W. T., Simple Proton Spectroscopic Imaging, Radiology, Vol. 153, pp. 189-194, 1984.   DOI
8 Perkins T.G., Herigault G., Eggers H., et al, Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0T: Preliminary Clinical Experience with 2-Point mDIXON as an Alternative to eThrive and Chemical Shift Imaging. Thieme E-Journals RoFo, pp. 182-A8, 2010.
9 M. H. Lee, Y. K. Kim, M. J. Park, et al, Gadoxetic acid-enhanced fat suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI using a multiecho dixon technique at 3 tesla: emphasis on image quality and hepatocellular carcinoma detection, J Magn Reson Imaging, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 401-410, 2013.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Puneet S., Bobby K., Hiroumi D., et al, Optimization of single injection arterial phase gadolinium enhanced MRI using bolus track real-time imaging, Journal of MRI, Vol. 33, pp. 110-118, 2011.
11 Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2012, https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/ index.do.
12 Nguyen M.H., Keeffe E.B., Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, J Clinical Gastroenterol, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 86-91, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Bayramoglu S., Kilickesmez O., Cimilli T., et al, T2-weighted MRI of the upper abdomen: comparison of four fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences including PROPELLER (BLADE) technique, Academic Radiology, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 368-374, 2010.
14 Mendez-Gallart R., Bautista A., Estevez E., et al., Abdominal cystic lymphangiomas in pediatrics; surgical approach and outcomes, Acta Chir Belg, Vol. 111 No. 6, pp. 374-377, 2011.   DOI
15 PHILIPS, m-DIXON being developed to simplify and accelerate liver MRI, Publication for the Philips MRI Community, Issue 41, pp. 32-33, 2010.
16 J. B. Seo, M. J. Cho, T. H. Jung, et al, A study consideration on abdomen magnetic resonance T1-weighted image for a pediatric in need of sedation, Korean Society of MR Technology, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 124-130, 2010.
17 The Korea Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Textbook Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Chung-Ku Publishing, 2010.
18 Y. I. Kim, MRI of the Whole Body, Korea Medical Publishing CO, 1995.
19 Blakeborough A., Mathieu D. G., Strotzer M., et al, Magnetic Resonance Image of the liver: New imaging strategies for evaluating focal liver lesions, Eur Radiol, Vol 10, pp. 72-85, 2009.
20 Stark D.D., Wittenberg J., Edelman R.R., et al, Detecion of hepatic metastases by magnetic resonance; Analysis of pulse sequence performance Radiology, Vol. 159, pp. 365-370, 1986.   DOI