1 |
Barabasi, A. L., Jeong, H., Neda Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A. and Viesek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. PHYSICA, A311, 590-614.
|
2 |
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-82.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Borner, K., Dall'Asta, L., Ke, W. and Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity, 10, 57-67.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Choi, Y. and Lee, K. (2009). Analysis of types of journal paper coauthor: focused on Korean Public Administration Review (1989-2008). Korean Public Administration Review, 43, 51-72.
|
5 |
Choi, S., Kang C., Choi, H. and Kang, B. (2011). Social network analysis for a soccer game. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 22, 1053-1063.
|
6 |
Cho, J. S. (2012). Inflow and outflow analysis of double majors using social network analysis. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 23, 693-701.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Chun, H. (2011). Analysis and application to customers' social roles using voice network of A telecom, company. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 24, 1237-1248.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Chun, H. and Leem, B. (2014). Face/non-face channel fit comparison of life insurance company and non-life insurance company using social network analysis. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 25, 1207-1219.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Fafchamps, M., Van der Leij, M. and Goyal, S. (2006). Scientific networks and co-authorship. University of Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 256.
|
11 |
Huang, M., Ahn, J. and Jahng, J. (2008). Patterns of Collaboration Networks : Co-authorship Analysis of MIS Quarterly from 1996 to 2004. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 13, 193-207.
|
12 |
Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30, 363-369.
DOI
|
13 |
Li-chun, Y., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R. and Ze-yuan, L. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42, 1599-1613.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Lee, M., Park, M., Lee, H. and Jin, S. (2011). Analysis of Papers in the Korean Journal of Applied Statistics by Co-Author Networks Analysis. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 24, 1259-1270.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Lee, S. (2010), A Preliminary Study on the Co-author Network Analysis of Korean Library & Information Science Research Community. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41, 297-315.
DOI
|
16 |
Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L. and Sompel, H. V. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1462-4180.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Menezes, G. V., Ziviani, N., Laender, A. H. F. and Almeida, V. (2009). A geographic analysis of knowledge production in computer science. Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference Committee, Madrid, Spain.
|
18 |
Nam, S. H. and Seol, S. (2007), Coauthorship analysis of innovation studies in Korea : A social network perspective. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 10, 605-628.
|
19 |
Nascimento, M. A., Sander, J. and Pound, J. (2003). Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph. SIGMOD Record, 32, 8-10.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Newman, M. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, Art. No. 016131.
|
21 |
Newman, M. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64, Art. No. 016132.
|
22 |
Rodriguez, M. A. and Pepe, A. (2008). On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of co-authorship network. Journal of Infometrics, 2, 195-201.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Newman, M. (2001c). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 98, 404-409.
DOI
|
24 |
Newman, M. (2003). Ego-centered networks and the ripple effect. Social Networks, 25, 83-95.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Otte, E. and Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28, 444-453.
|
26 |
Velden, T., Haque, A. and Lagoze, C. (2010). A New Approach to Analyzing Patterns of Collaborationin Co-authorship Networks - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation. arXiv:0911.4761.
|
27 |
Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collectively dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Yan, E. and Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a co-authorship network analysi. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2107-2118.
DOI
ScienceOn
|