Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.6.1183

Handling the nonresponse in sample survey  

Lee, Hwa-Jung (Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University)
Kang, Suk-Bok (Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society / v.23, no.6, 2012 , pp. 1183-1194 More about this Journal
Abstract
When it comes to a survey, no answer would occur frequently. Therefore various methods for handling nonresponse have been applied to analyse the survey. In this paper, the ratio of occurrence of two type of nonresponse cases - unit nonresponse and item nonresponse - is presented using previous real survey data, and we compared complete data and data with nonresponse. We suggest the reason of happening of nonresponse and the ratio of nonresponse using data collected through group interviews.
Keywords
Item nonresponse; missing value; unit nonresponse; weighting adjustment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, J. K., Han, G. S. and Yoon, Y. (2004). Nonresponse weighting adjustment inn Korea household income and expenditure survey. Journal of the Korean Official Statistics, 9, 79-102.
2 Kim, K. S. (2000). Imputation methods for nonresponse and their effect. The Korean Association for Survey Research, 1, 1-12.   과학기술학회마을
3 Kim, Y. W. and Cho, S. K. (1996). Imputation method of item nonresponse in sample survey. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 3, 145-159.
4 King, G., Honaker, J., Joseh, A. and Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49-69   DOI
5 Ku, T. G. (2008). A study of Korean journalists' perception on poll reporting. Journal of Political Communication, 7, 47-82.
6 Kwon, H. N. (1997). The 15th presidential election and the polls. Proceedings of The Korean Association of Broadcasting and Telecommunication, 159-166.   DOI
7 Kwon, H. N. (2006). Theory and practice of media election, Comunicationbooks, Seoul.
8 National Election Commission. (2012). Voter opinion survey for the 19th assembly elections, National Election Commission, Seoul.
9 Lee, S. W. and Kim, E. G. (1997). Statistical techniques for treatment of nonresponses in public health categorical data. Journal of the Korean Society of Health Statistics, 22, 114-132.
10 Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Santos, R. L. (1981). Effects of imputation on complex statistics, income survey development program, survey development research center in nonresponse and imputation report on additional task 2, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
12 Shin, H. W. and Sohn, S. Y. (2002). Comparing accuracy of imputation methods for categorical incomplete data. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 15, 33-43.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Singleton, R. and Bruce S. (2005). Approaches to social research, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
14 Dufour, J., Gagnon, F., Morin, Y., Renaud, M. and Sarndal, C.-E. (2001). A better understanding of weight transformation through a measure of change. Survey Methodology, 27 97-108.
15 Yoon, Y. H. and Choi, B. (2012). Model selection method for categorical data with non-response. Journal of Korean Data & Information Science Society, 23, 627-641.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research, 11th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
17 Choi, P. G. (2011). The study of imputation method for item nonresponse in the economic census, Research report, the first half of 2011, Statistical Center, Statistical Research Institute, Daejeon.
18 Hedderley, D. and Wakeling, I. (1995). A comparison of imputation techniques for internal prefeerence mapping, using monte carlo simulation. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 281-297.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kalton, G. (1983). Compensating for missing survey data, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
20 Kang, M. A. and Kim, K. A. (2006). Handling of missing data in public policy studies. Public Administration Review, 40, 31-52.