Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.6.1055

The change of relative importance in athletes self management test through AHP  

Yu, Kwang-Kil (Sport Science Industry Research Institute, Chonbuk National University)
Chung, Sung-Suk (Department of Statistics, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society / v.23, no.6, 2012 , pp. 1055-1064 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research was to count and quantify relative importance through analytic hierarchy process on checkups items in order to solve the questions raised by uniformalized numbering in the established athletes self management test. This study has the following results. The relative importance in priority factors of the test is in following order of training management, mental care, body care and interpersonal management. It was also confirmed that relative importance varied according to every checkup item in the lower factors. Consequently, the new result from this study, as an initial research for the relative importance of athletes self management test, supplied the possibility in which the sports-field expert's opinion was reflected. It was expected that this study would be helpful for enhancing athletes' competence in the sports field.
Keywords
Analytic hierarchy process; athletes self management test; relative importance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cho, K. T., Cho, Y. G. and Kang, H. S. (2003). The analytical hierarchy process, Donghyunsa, Seoul.
2 Huh, J. H. and Yoo, J. (2004). The self management strategies of Korean national athletes: Qualitative research. Korean Journal of Sports Psychology, 15, 27-52.
3 Huh, J. H., Kim, B. J. and Yoo, J. (2001). Korean athletes self-management strategies in practice and competition. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 40, 187-198.
4 Jones, R. T., Nelson, R. E. and Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The role of external variables in self reinforcement: A review. Behavior Modification, 1, 147-178.   DOI
5 Lee, J. T. (2010). A study on the performance pattern in the elite decathlon. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Society, 6, 1071-1079.   과학기술학회마을
6 Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Physiological Review, 13, 27-34.
7 Orlick, T. and Partington, J. (1988). Mental links to excellence. The Sport Psychologist, 2, 105-130.   DOI
8 Saaty, T. L. (1982). The analytic hierarchy process: A new approach to deal with fuzziness in architecture. Architect Science Review, 25, 64-69.   DOI
9 Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10 Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann, L. and Knapp, J. (1997). Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making. Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 3, 16-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal Operational Research, 48, 2-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yu, K. K. (2010). Analysis on priority of success factors in the provincial sports event through AHP method. Korean Journal of Sport Management, 15, 91-102.