Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.1.143

Course evaluation model using standardized transformation by group in student evaluation of teaching  

Lee, Jae-Man (Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University)
Cha, Young-Joon (Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society / v.23, no.1, 2012 , pp. 143-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
Based on the student evaluation of teaching from 'A' university where students are graded by relative performance, we conducted a research on the effect of course characteristics in student evaluation of teaching. The results show that the score of student evaluation of teaching seems to be higher for those classes with more proportion of male students, higher grades, and smaller class sizes. From these results, we suggest an evaluation model which can control the effect of grade and sex. Also we illustrate the performance of the evaluation model by using a case study.
Keywords
Course characteristics; course evaluation model; student evaluation of teaching;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Neath, I. (1996). How to improve your teaching evaluations without improving your teaching. Psychological Reports, 78, 1363-1372.   DOI
2 류춘호, 이정호 (2003). 대학의 강의평가에 영향을 미치는 학생관련 요인에 관한 연구. <경영학 연구>, 32, 789-807.
3 양미경 (2008). 학생의 평정에 의거한 대학 강의평가의 의의와 한계. <교육원리연구>, 13, 93-122.
4 이기훈 (2010). 강의평가의 타당성과 신뢰성에 관한 연구 전주대학교 강의평가 결과를 중심으로. <한국데이터정보과학회지>, 21, 87-98.
5 조장식 (2010). 회귀분석에 기초한 균등화 방법에 관한 연구. <한국데이터정보과학회지>, 21, 513-521.
6 허순영, 장덕준 (2011). 인터넷 설문조사에서 익명성 훼손이 응답에 미치는 효과. <한국데이터정보과학회지>, 22, 785-794.
7 Marsh, H. W. and Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Minitab Institute (2010). Minitab 16 statistical software, Minitab Inc., PA.