Browse > Article

Forecasting volatility via conditional autoregressive value at risk model based on support vector quantile regression  

Shim, Joo-Yong (Department of Data Science, Institute of Statistical Information, Inje University)
Hwang, Chang-Ha (Department of Statistics, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society / v.22, no.3, 2011 , pp. 589-596 More about this Journal
Abstract
The conditional autoregressive value at risk (CAViaR) model is useful for risk management, which does not require the assumption that the conditional distribution does not vary over time but the volatility does. But it does not provide volatility forecasts, which are needed for several important applications such as option pricing and portfolio management. For a variety of probability distributions, it is known that there is a constant relationship between the standard deviation and the distance between symmetric quantiles in the tails of the distribution. This inspires us to use a support vector quantile regression (SVQR) for volatility forecasts with the distance between CAViaR forecasts of symmetric quantiles. Simulated example and real example are provided to indicate the usefulness of proposed forecasting method for volatility.
Keywords
Conditional autoregressive value at risk model; cross validation; support vector quantile regression; volatility;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shim, J. and Lee, J. T. (2010). Restricted support vector quantile regression without crossing. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21, 1319 -1325.
2 Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory, Wiley, New York.
3 Yuan, M. (2006). GACV for quantile smoothing splines. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50, 813-829.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kim, M., Park, H., Hwang, C. and Shim, J. (2008). Claims reserving via kernel machine. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 1419 -1427.
5 Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantile. Econometrica, 46, 33-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Li, Y., Liu, Y. and Ji, Z. (2007). Quantile regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 255-268.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Mercer, J. (1909). Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 415-446.
8 Pearson, E. S. and Tukey, J. W. (1965). Approximate means and standard deviations based on distances between percentage points of frequency curves. Biometrika, 52, 533-546.   DOI
9 Perez-Cruz, F., Afonso-Rodr1guez, J. A. and Giner, J. (2003). Estimating GARCH models using support vector machines. Quantitative Finance, 3, 1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Engle, R. F. and Manganelli, S. (2004). CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22, 367-381.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Hwang, C. (2008). Mixed effects kernel binomial regression. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 1327-1334.
12 Hwang, C. (2007). Kernel machine for Poisson regression. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 18, 767-772.