1 |
Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, editors. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 1999. p.150-269.
|
2 |
Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:759-77.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Coughlin MJ, Thompson FM. The high price of high-fashion footwear. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:371-7.
|
4 |
Scott G, Wilson DW, Bentley G. Roentgenographic assessment in hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(267):143-7.
|
5 |
Yoo CI, Kim BH, Shin KS, Im JI. A clinical and radiological study of the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle and hallux valgus of Koreans. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1990;25:1183-90.
|
6 |
Easley ME, Trnka HJ. Current concepts review: hallux valgus part 1: pathomechanics, clinical assessment, and nonoperative management. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:654-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Kato T, Watanabe S. The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(157):78-81.
|
8 |
Sim-Fook L, Hodgson AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40:1058-62.
DOI
|
9 |
Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus--etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(157):31-41.
|
10 |
Craigmile DA. Incidence, origin, and prevention of certain foot defects. Br Med J. 1953;2:749-52.
DOI
|
11 |
Kalen V, Brecher A. Relationship between adolescent bunions and flatfeet. Foot Ankle. 1988;8:331-6.
DOI
|
12 |
Kilmartin TE, Wallace WA. The significance of pes planus in juvenile hallux valgus. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:53-6.
DOI
|
13 |
Saragas NP, Becker PJ. Comparative radiographic analysis of parameters in feet with and without hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:139-43.
DOI
|
14 |
Shi K, Hayashida K, Tomita T, Tanabe M, Ochi T. Surgical treatment of hallux valgus deformity in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and radiographic evaluation of modified Lapidus technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39:376-82.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Myerson MS, Badekas A. Hypermobility of the first ray. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:469-84.
|
16 |
Schneider W. Influence of different anatomical structures on distal soft tissue procedure in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:991-6.
DOI
|
17 |
Faber FW, Kleinrensink GJ, Mulder PG, Verhaar JA. Mobility of the first tarsometatarsal joint in hallux valgus patients: a radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:965-9.
DOI
|
18 |
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux valgus in men. Part II: first ray mobility after bunionectomy and factors associated with hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:73-8.
|
19 |
Doty JF, Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus and hypermobility of the first ray: facts and fiction. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1655-60.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Nery C, Coughlin MJ, Baumfeld D, Ballerini FJ, Kobata S. Hallux valgus in males--part 2: radiographic assessment of surgical treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:636-44.
DOI
|
21 |
Uchiyama E, Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, Grande JP, Kura H, An KN. Pathomechanics of hallux valgus: biomechanical and immunohistochemical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:732-8.
DOI
|
22 |
Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Akiyama K, Fujii T, Tamai S. Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus in women on weightbearing and nonweightbearing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(336):186-94.
|
23 |
Fuhrmann RA, Layher F, Wetzel WD. Radiographic changes in forefoot geometry with weightbearing. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:326-31.
DOI
|
24 |
Ledoux WR, Shofer JB, Smith DG, Sullivan K, Hayes SG, Assal M, et al. Relationship between foot type, foot deformity, and ulcer occurrence in the high-risk diabetic foot. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:665-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Young KW, Kim JS, Cho JW, Lee KW, Park YU, Lee KT. Characteristics of male adolescent-onset hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:1111-6.
DOI
|
26 |
Faber FW, Kleinrensink GJ, Verhoog MW, Vijn AH, Snijders CJ, Mulder PG, et al. Mobility of the first tarsometatarsal joint in relation to hallux valgus deformity: anatomical and biomechanical aspects. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:651-6.
DOI
|