Browse > Article

The Impacts of Fixation Tightness and Duration on the Remnant Syndesmotic Widening and Clinical Symptom after Removal of Screws  

Bae, Su-Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Sohn, Su-Een (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Seong, Min-Kyu (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society / v.17, no.4, 2013 , pp. 264-271 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to analyze the effect of fixation tightness of the syndesmotic screw and its indwelling period on the recurrence of the syndesmosis widening after screw removal and the clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Forty consecutive patients with acute syndesmotic injury were retrospectively reviewed. The tibiofibular clear space is measured by digitalized measurement tool on serial radiographs. We analyzed the effect of time from trauma to fixation, syndesmotic screw indwelling duration, and fixation methods. Residual symptoms at the last follow up were evaluated. The student t-test, correlation test, and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Eighteen ankles (45%) had recurrent syndesmosis widening (greater than 5% compared to the contralateral side). Seven patients had pain and five had limitation of motion in the ankle joint. Fixation tightness had significant effect on reducing the recurrence while the severity of the initial widening, time to fixation, and duration of fixation did not affect the outcome. Conclusion: Tight fixation of syndesmotic screw is essential for achieving final syndesmotic stability and reducing recurrence.
Keywords
Syndesmosis; Widening; Rupture; Fixation; Recurrence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee GB. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Korean Fract Soc. 2007;20:282-90.   DOI
2 Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:12-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ramsey P, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:356-7.   DOI
4 Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:405-10.
5 Hoiness P, Stromsoe K. Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:331-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kukreti S, Faraj A, Miles JN. Does position of syndesmotic screw affect functional and radiological outcome in ankle fractures? Injury. 2005;36:1121-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Am J Orthop Trauma. 2010;15:330-9.
8 McBryde A, Chiasson B, Wilhelm A, Donovan F, Ray T, Bacilla P. Syndesmotic screw placement: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:262-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE. Comparison of tricortical screw flxation versus a modifled suture construct for flxation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J orthop Trauma. 1999;13:39-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Stuart K, Panchbhavi VK. The fate of syndesmotic screws. J Am J Orthop Trauma. 2011;15:330-9.
11 Bae SY, Chung HJ, Oh SC. Evaluation of intraoperative stress radiologic tests for syndesmotic injuries. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2011;15:22-6.
12 Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, Lestini WF, Hurwitz SR. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;10: 325-30.
13 Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10: 325-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Clarke HJ, Michelson JD, Cox QG, Jinnah RH. Tibiotalar stability in bimalleolar ankle fractures: a dynamic in vitro contact area study. Foot Ankle Int.1991;11:222-7.   DOI
15 Close JR. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;8A:761-81.
16 Park SY, Park SW, Hahn SB, Jung WK, Choi KS, Lee SH. Syndesmosis injury associated with the Weber type B lateral malleolar fracture. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008;43: 359-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Rasmussen O, Tovborg-Jensen I, Boe S. Distal tibiofibular ligaments. Analysis of function. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;10: 325-30.
18 Needleman RL, Skrade DA, Stiehl JB. Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion. Foot Ankle. 1989:10;17-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Gwak HC, Kwon YW. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Korean Soc Foot Surg. 2011;15:187-94.
20 Jordan TH, Talarico RH, Schuberth JM. The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;15: 330-9.
21 Tornetta P, Spoo JE, Reynolds FA, Lee C. Overtightening of the ankle syndesmosis: is it really possible? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:492-7.
22 Zalavras C and Thordarson D. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:330-9.   DOI
23 Lee DY. Comparative analysis for syndesmotic fixation vs non-syndesmotic fixation of distal tibiofibular diastasis. J Korean Fract Soc. 1998;11:585-90.   DOI
24 Park HK, Moon SS. Ideal insertion position of ankle syndesmosis screw. J Korean Soc Foot Surg. 2002;6:60-5.